Advanced search
1 file | 406.90 KB

Social egg freezing: for better, not for worse

Heidi Mertes (UGent) and Guido Pennings (UGent)
Author
Organization
Keywords
FRESH, OOCYTE CRYOPRESERVATION, RELEVANT STANDARD, WOMEN, GESTATION, ANTIMULLERIAN HORMONE, FERTILITY PRESERVATION, ASSISTED REPRODUCTION, AGE, CHILDBEARING, cryostorage, fertility decline, fertility preservation, oocyte cryopreservation, reproductive aging, social egg freezing

Downloads

  • Mertes and Pennings Social egg freezing - author version.pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 406.90 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Chicago
Mertes, Heidi, and Guido Pennings. 2011. “Social Egg Freezing: For Better, Not for Worse.” Reproductive Biomedicine Online 23 (7): 824–829.
APA
Mertes, H., & Pennings, G. (2011). Social egg freezing: for better, not for worse. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 23(7), 824–829.
Vancouver
1.
Mertes H, Pennings G. Social egg freezing: for better, not for worse. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE. 2011;23(7):824–9.
MLA
Mertes, Heidi, and Guido Pennings. “Social Egg Freezing: For Better, Not for Worse.” REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE 23.7 (2011): 824–829. Print.
@article{1970620,
  author       = {Mertes, Heidi and Pennings, Guido},
  issn         = {1472-6483},
  journal      = {REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE},
  keyword      = {FRESH,OOCYTE CRYOPRESERVATION,RELEVANT STANDARD,WOMEN,GESTATION,ANTIMULLERIAN HORMONE,FERTILITY PRESERVATION,ASSISTED REPRODUCTION,AGE,CHILDBEARING,cryostorage,fertility decline,fertility preservation,oocyte cryopreservation,reproductive aging,social egg freezing},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {7},
  pages        = {824--829},
  title        = {Social egg freezing: for better, not for worse},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.09.010},
  volume       = {23},
  year         = {2011},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: