Advanced search
1 file | 425.65 KB
Author
Organization
Abstract
Physical activity guidelines from around the world are typically expressed in terms of frequency, duration, and intensity parameters. Objective monitoring using pedometers and accelerometers offers a new opportunity to measure and communicate physical activity in terms of steps/day. Various step-based versions or translations of physical activity guidelines are emerging, reflecting public interest in such guidance. However, there appears to be a wide discrepancy in the exact values that are being communicated. It makes sense that step-based recommendations should be harmonious with existing evidence-based public health guidelines that recognize that "some physical activity is better than none" while maintaining a focus on time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Thus, the purpose of this review was to update our existing knowledge of "How many steps/day are enough?", and to inform step-based recommendations consistent with current physical activity guidelines. Normative data indicate that healthy adults typically take between 4,000 and 18,000 steps/day, and that 10,000 steps/day is reasonable for this population, although there are notable "low active populations." Interventions demonstrate incremental increases on the order of 2,000-2,500 steps/day. The results of seven different controlled studies demonstrate that there is a strong relationship between cadence and intensity. Further, despite some inter-individual variation, 100 steps/minute represents a reasonable floor value indicative of moderate intensity walking. Multiplying this cadence by 30 minutes (i.e., typical of a daily recommendation) produces a minimum of 3,000 steps that is best used as a heuristic (i.e., guiding) value, but these steps must be taken over and above habitual activity levels to be a true expression of free-living steps/day that also includes recommendations for minimal amounts of time in MVPA. Computed steps/day translations of time in MVPA that also include estimates of habitual activity levels equate to 7,100 to 11,000 steps/day. A direct estimate of minimal amounts of MVPA accumulated in the course of objectively monitored free-living behaviour is 7,000-8,000 steps/day. A scale that spans a wide range of incremental increases in steps/day and is congruent with public health recognition that "some physical activity is better than none," yet still incorporates step-based translations of recommended amounts of time in MVPA may be useful in research and practice. The full range of users (researchers to practitioners to the general public) of objective monitoring instruments that provide step-based outputs require good reference data and evidence-based recommendations to be able to design effective health messages congruent with public health physical activity guidelines, guide behaviour change, and ultimately measure, track, and interpret steps/day.
Keywords
CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE, ENERGY-EXPENDITURE, US ADULTS, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL, OF-SPORTS-MEDICINE, PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY RECOMMENDATIONS, POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN, OLDER-ADULTS, AMBULATORY ACTIVITY, PUBLIC-HEALTH

Downloads

  • TudorLocke 2011 IJBNPA 8 a79.pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 425.65 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Chicago
Tudor-Locke, Catrine, Cora L Craig, Wendy J Brown, Stacy A Clemes, Katrien De Cocker, Billie Giles-Corti, Yoshiro Hatano, et al. 2011. “How Many Steps/day Are Enough? : for Adults.” International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 8.
APA
Tudor-Locke, C., Craig, C. L., Brown, W. J., Clemes, S. A., De Cocker, K., Giles-Corti, B., Hatano, Y., et al. (2011). How many steps/day are enough? : for adults. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 8.
Vancouver
1.
Tudor-Locke C, Craig CL, Brown WJ, Clemes SA, De Cocker K, Giles-Corti B, et al. How many steps/day are enough? : for adults. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY. 2011;8.
MLA
Tudor-Locke, Catrine, Cora L Craig, Wendy J Brown, et al. “How Many Steps/day Are Enough? : for Adults.” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY 8 (2011): n. pag. Print.
@article{1955912,
  abstract     = {Physical activity guidelines from around the world are typically expressed in terms of frequency, duration, and intensity parameters. Objective monitoring using pedometers and accelerometers offers a new opportunity to measure and communicate physical activity in terms of steps/day. Various step-based versions or translations of physical activity guidelines are emerging, reflecting public interest in such guidance. However, there appears to be a wide discrepancy in the exact values that are being communicated. It makes sense that step-based recommendations should be harmonious with existing evidence-based public health guidelines that recognize that {\textacutedbl}some physical activity is better than none{\textacutedbl} while maintaining a focus on time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Thus, the purpose of this review was to update our existing knowledge of {\textacutedbl}How many steps/day are enough?{\textacutedbl}, and to inform step-based recommendations consistent with current physical activity guidelines. Normative data indicate that healthy adults typically take between 4,000 and 18,000 steps/day, and that 10,000 steps/day is reasonable for this population, although there are notable {\textacutedbl}low active populations.{\textacutedbl} Interventions demonstrate incremental increases on the order of 2,000-2,500 steps/day. The results of seven different controlled studies demonstrate that there is a strong relationship between cadence and intensity. Further, despite some inter-individual variation, 100 steps/minute represents a reasonable floor value indicative of moderate intensity walking. Multiplying this cadence by 30 minutes (i.e., typical of a daily recommendation) produces a minimum of 3,000 steps that is best used as a heuristic (i.e., guiding) value, but these steps must be taken over and above habitual activity levels to be a true expression of free-living steps/day that also includes recommendations for minimal amounts of time in MVPA. Computed steps/day translations of time in MVPA that also include estimates of habitual activity levels equate to 7,100 to 11,000 steps/day. A direct estimate of minimal amounts of MVPA accumulated in the course of objectively monitored free-living behaviour is 7,000-8,000 steps/day. A scale that spans a wide range of incremental increases in steps/day and is congruent with public health recognition that {\textacutedbl}some physical activity is better than none,{\textacutedbl} yet still incorporates step-based translations of recommended amounts of time in MVPA may be useful in research and practice. The full range of users (researchers to practitioners to the general public) of objective monitoring instruments that provide step-based outputs require good reference data and evidence-based recommendations to be able to design effective health messages congruent with public health physical activity guidelines, guide behaviour change, and ultimately measure, track, and interpret steps/day.},
  articleno    = {79},
  author       = {Tudor-Locke, Catrine and Craig, Cora L and Brown, Wendy J and Clemes, Stacy A and De Cocker, Katrien and Giles-Corti, Billie and Hatano, Yoshiro and Inoue, Shigeru and Matsudo, Sandra M and Mutrie, Nanette and Oppert, Jean-Michel and Rowe, David A and Schmidt, Michael D and Schofield, Grant M and Spence, John C and Teixeira, Pedro J and Tully, Mark A and Blair, Steven N},
  issn         = {1479-5868},
  journal      = {INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY},
  keyword      = {CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE,ENERGY-EXPENDITURE,US ADULTS,RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL,OF-SPORTS-MEDICINE,PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY RECOMMENDATIONS,POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN,OLDER-ADULTS,AMBULATORY ACTIVITY,PUBLIC-HEALTH},
  language     = {eng},
  pages        = {17},
  title        = {How many steps/day are enough? : for adults},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-79},
  volume       = {8},
  year         = {2011},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: