Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Analyse: vereffening versus faillissement

Nathalie Cooreman UGent and Diederik Bruloot UGent (2011) DE JURISTENKRANT (DEURNE). p.16-16
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
journal title
DE JURISTENKRANT (DEURNE)
Juristenkrant (Deurne)
issue
237
pages
16 - 16
ISSN
1374-3538
language
Dutch
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A4
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
1943195
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-1943195
date created
2011-11-17 11:48:20
date last changed
2016-12-19 15:46:40
@article{1943195,
  author       = {Cooreman, Nathalie and Bruloot, Diederik},
  issn         = {1374-3538},
  journal      = {DE JURISTENKRANT (DEURNE)},
  language     = {dut},
  number       = {237},
  pages        = {16--16},
  title        = {Analyse: vereffening versus faillissement},
  year         = {2011},
}

Chicago
Cooreman, Nathalie, and Diederik Bruloot. 2011. “Analyse: Vereffening Versus Faillissement.” De Juristenkrant (deurne) (237): 16–16.
APA
Cooreman, N., & Bruloot, D. (2011). Analyse: vereffening versus faillissement. DE JURISTENKRANT (DEURNE), (237), 16–16.
Vancouver
1.
Cooreman N, Bruloot D. Analyse: vereffening versus faillissement. DE JURISTENKRANT (DEURNE). 2011;(237):16–16.
MLA
Cooreman, Nathalie, and Diederik Bruloot. “Analyse: Vereffening Versus Faillissement.” DE JURISTENKRANT (DEURNE) 237 (2011): 16–16. Print.