Advanced search
1 file | 646.88 KB

NAA and ICP-MS: a comparison between two methods for trace and ultra-trace element analysis

Luc Moens (UGent) and Richard Dams (UGent)
Author
Organization
Abstract
NAA and ICP-MS are both highly sensitive methods for multi-element trace- and ultra-trace element determination. A comparison between analytical figures of merit of both methods is made. Both methods have specific advantages that put them beyond competition for certain applications. It is concluded that ICP-MS can replace NAA for many routine analyses. NAA remains essential as a highly reliable and accurate reference method.
Keywords
POLYATOMIC ION INTERFERENCES, PLASMA-MASS-SPECTROMETRY, PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY, ATOMIC EMISSION-SPECTROMETRY, SAMPLE INTRODUCTION, LASER ABLATION, ELECTROTHERMAL VAPORIZATION, PEAK EFFICIENCY, FLOW-INJECTION, STANDARDIZATION

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 646.88 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Chicago
Moens, Luc, and Richard Dams. 1995. “NAA and ICP-MS: a Comparison Between Two Methods for Trace and Ultra-trace Element Analysis.” Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry-articles 192 (1): 29–38.
APA
Moens, L., & Dams, R. (1995). NAA and ICP-MS: a comparison between two methods for trace and ultra-trace element analysis. JOURNAL OF RADIOANALYTICAL AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY-ARTICLES, 192(1), 29–38. Presented at the 3rd International conference on Methods and Applications of Radioanalytical Chemistry (MARC-III).
Vancouver
1.
Moens L, Dams R. NAA and ICP-MS: a comparison between two methods for trace and ultra-trace element analysis. JOURNAL OF RADIOANALYTICAL AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY-ARTICLES. 1995;192(1):29–38.
MLA
Moens, Luc, and Richard Dams. “NAA and ICP-MS: a Comparison Between Two Methods for Trace and Ultra-trace Element Analysis.” JOURNAL OF RADIOANALYTICAL AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY-ARTICLES 192.1 (1995): 29–38. Print.
@article{193801,
  abstract     = {NAA and ICP-MS are both highly sensitive methods for multi-element trace- and ultra-trace element determination. A comparison between analytical figures of merit of both methods is made. Both methods have specific advantages that put them beyond competition for certain applications. It is concluded that ICP-MS can replace NAA for many routine analyses. NAA remains essential as a highly reliable and accurate reference method.},
  author       = {Moens, Luc and Dams, Richard},
  issn         = {0236-5731},
  journal      = {JOURNAL OF RADIOANALYTICAL AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY-ARTICLES},
  keyword      = {POLYATOMIC ION INTERFERENCES,PLASMA-MASS-SPECTROMETRY,PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY,ATOMIC EMISSION-SPECTROMETRY,SAMPLE INTRODUCTION,LASER ABLATION,ELECTROTHERMAL VAPORIZATION,PEAK EFFICIENCY,FLOW-INJECTION,STANDARDIZATION},
  language     = {eng},
  location     = {Kailua Kona, HI, USA},
  number       = {1},
  pages        = {29--38},
  title        = {NAA and ICP-MS: a comparison between two methods for trace and ultra-trace element analysis},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02037733},
  volume       = {192},
  year         = {1995},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric