Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

'Progressief seksueel pessimisme': progressieve onvrede met de seksuele revoluties en het belang van instemming voor een seksuele ethiek

Tom Claes UGent (2010) ETHIEK & MAATSCHAPPIJ. 13(1). p.39-67
abstract
Lamenting the ‘state of contemporary sex’ seems to be a thriving academic business, and is, not surprisingly, probably just as booming as sex as a commercial business is blooming. These critiques come in many flavours, and are inspired by a range of different backgrounds and worries. Some feminists and some progressive intellectuals join the chorus, thereby echoing parts of the more conservative critiques, albeit on different grounds, from different backgrounds and defending different ideals. I label their position as ‘progressive sexual pessimism.’ Progressive, because they all share a broadly emancipatory outlook on sexuality, thus distinguishing their views from contemporary conservative critiques of (post)modern sexuality; and pessimistic because on the whole they take a rather dim view of the possibility of the realization of a healthy and emancipatory sexuality under the conditions of (post)modernity. One of the critiques is that a ‘morality of negotiations,’ based on the notion of (valid) consent, is in itself unable to provide any directions for a meaningful sexuality. They defend the view that such a morality of negotiation empties the sexual domain of any (inherent) values, thereby rendering it vulnerable to commercialisation, commodification, pornofication, etc, or that such a ‘morality of consent’ is blind to the actual power-relations within society. In this contribution I attempt to place these viewpoints within the wider perspective of the sexual revolutions and briefly develop one line of defence of a sexual morality of negotiations, based on the multiplicity of sexual meanings.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
Consent, Sexuality, Ethics
journal title
ETHIEK & MAATSCHAPPIJ
Ethiek Maatsch.
volume
13
issue
1
issue title
De seksuele revoluties
pages
39 - 67
ISSN
1373-0975
language
Dutch
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A2
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
VABB id
c:vabb:321936
VABB type
VABB-1
id
1856786
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-1856786
date created
2011-07-12 09:48:50
date last changed
2012-03-07 14:43:51
@article{1856786,
  abstract     = {Lamenting the {\textquoteleft}state of contemporary sex{\textquoteright} seems to be a thriving academic business, and is, not surprisingly, probably just as booming as sex as a commercial business is blooming. These critiques come in many flavours, and are inspired by a range of different backgrounds and worries. Some feminists and some progressive intellectuals join the chorus, thereby echoing parts of the more conservative critiques, albeit on different grounds, from different backgrounds and defending different ideals. I label their position as {\textquoteleft}progressive sexual pessimism.{\textquoteright} Progressive, because they all share a broadly emancipatory outlook on sexuality, thus distinguishing their views from contemporary conservative critiques of (post)modern sexuality; and pessimistic because on the whole they take a rather dim view of the possibility of the realization of a healthy and emancipatory sexuality under the conditions of (post)modernity. One of the critiques is that a {\textquoteleft}morality of negotiations,{\textquoteright} based on the notion of (valid) consent, is in itself unable to provide any directions for a meaningful sexuality. They defend the view that such a morality of negotiation empties the sexual domain of any (inherent) values, thereby rendering it vulnerable to commercialisation, commodification, pornofication, etc, or that such a {\textquoteleft}morality of consent{\textquoteright} is blind to the actual power-relations within society. In this contribution I attempt to place these viewpoints within the wider perspective of the sexual revolutions and briefly develop one line of defence of a sexual morality of negotiations, based on the multiplicity of sexual meanings.},
  author       = {Claes, Tom},
  issn         = {1373-0975},
  journal      = {ETHIEK \& MAATSCHAPPIJ},
  keyword      = {Consent,Sexuality,Ethics},
  language     = {dut},
  number       = {1},
  pages        = {39--67},
  title        = {'Progressief seksueel pessimisme': progressieve onvrede met de seksuele revoluties en het belang van instemming voor een seksuele ethiek},
  volume       = {13},
  year         = {2010},
}

Chicago
Claes, Tom. 2010. “‘Progressief Seksueel Pessimisme’: Progressieve Onvrede Met De Seksuele Revoluties En Het Belang Van Instemming Voor Een Seksuele Ethiek.” Ethiek & Maatschappij 13 (1): 39–67.
APA
Claes, T. (2010). “Progressief seksueel pessimisme”: progressieve onvrede met de seksuele revoluties en het belang van instemming voor een seksuele ethiek. ETHIEK & MAATSCHAPPIJ, 13(1), 39–67.
Vancouver
1.
Claes T. “Progressief seksueel pessimisme”: progressieve onvrede met de seksuele revoluties en het belang van instemming voor een seksuele ethiek. ETHIEK & MAATSCHAPPIJ. 2010;13(1):39–67.
MLA
Claes, Tom. “‘Progressief Seksueel Pessimisme’: Progressieve Onvrede Met De Seksuele Revoluties En Het Belang Van Instemming Voor Een Seksuele Ethiek.” ETHIEK & MAATSCHAPPIJ 13.1 (2010): 39–67. Print.