Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

The covering law model applied to dynamical cognitive science: a comment on Joel Walmsley

Raoul Gervais UGent and Erik Weber UGent (2011) MINDS AND MACHINES. 21(1). p.33-39
abstract
In a 2008 paper, Walmsley argued that the explanations employed in the dynamical approach to cognitive science, as exemplified by the Haken, Kelso and Bunz model of rhythmic finger movement, and the model of infant preservative reaching developed by Esther Thelen and her colleagues, conform to Carl Hempel and Paul Oppenheim's deductive-nomological model of explanation (also known as the covering law model). Although we think Walmsley's approach is methodologically sound in that it starts with an analysis of scientific practice rather than a general philosophical framework, we nevertheless feel that there are two problems with his paper. First, he focuses only on the deductivenomological model and so neglects the important fact that explanations are causal. Second, the explanations offered by the dynamical approach do not take the deductive-nomological format, because they do not deduce the explananda from exceptionless laws. Because of these two points, Walmsley makes the dynamical explanations in cognitive science appear problematic, while in fact they are not.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
Covering law, Explanation, Dynamical cognitive science, Cognition, Causal asymmetry, Dynamicism
journal title
MINDS AND MACHINES
Minds Mach.
volume
21
issue
1
pages
33 - 39
Web of Science type
Article
Web of Science id
000289986800004
JCR category
COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
JCR impact factor
0.31 (2011)
JCR rank
101/111 (2011)
JCR quartile
4 (2011)
ISSN
0924-6495
DOI
10.1007/s11023-010-9216-9
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
1855775
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-1855775
date created
2011-07-08 09:41:40
date last changed
2015-06-17 09:48:55
@article{1855775,
  abstract     = {In a 2008 paper, Walmsley argued that the explanations employed in the dynamical approach to cognitive science, as exemplified by the Haken, Kelso and Bunz model of rhythmic finger movement, and the model of infant preservative reaching developed by Esther Thelen and her colleagues, conform to Carl Hempel and Paul Oppenheim's deductive-nomological model of explanation (also known as the covering law model). Although we think Walmsley's approach is methodologically sound in that it starts with an analysis of scientific practice rather than a general philosophical framework, we nevertheless feel that there are two problems with his paper. First, he focuses only on the deductivenomological model and so neglects the important fact that explanations are causal. Second, the explanations offered by the dynamical approach do not take the deductive-nomological format, because they do not deduce the explananda from exceptionless laws. Because of these two points, Walmsley makes the dynamical explanations in cognitive science appear problematic, while in fact they are not.},
  author       = {Gervais, Raoul and Weber, Erik},
  issn         = {0924-6495},
  journal      = {MINDS AND MACHINES},
  keyword      = {Covering law,Explanation,Dynamical cognitive science,Cognition,Causal asymmetry,Dynamicism},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {1},
  pages        = {33--39},
  title        = {The covering law model applied to dynamical cognitive science: a comment on Joel Walmsley},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11023-010-9216-9},
  volume       = {21},
  year         = {2011},
}

Chicago
Gervais, Raoul, and Erik Weber. 2011. “The Covering Law Model Applied to Dynamical Cognitive Science: a Comment on Joel Walmsley.” Minds and Machines 21 (1): 33–39.
APA
Gervais, R., & Weber, E. (2011). The covering law model applied to dynamical cognitive science: a comment on Joel Walmsley. MINDS AND MACHINES, 21(1), 33–39.
Vancouver
1.
Gervais R, Weber E. The covering law model applied to dynamical cognitive science: a comment on Joel Walmsley. MINDS AND MACHINES. 2011;21(1):33–9.
MLA
Gervais, Raoul, and Erik Weber. “The Covering Law Model Applied to Dynamical Cognitive Science: a Comment on Joel Walmsley.” MINDS AND MACHINES 21.1 (2011): 33–39. Print.