Advanced search

Comparison of catgut and polyglactin 910 for uterine sutures during bovine caesarean sections.

(1997) VETERINARY RECORD. 140(17). p.458-459
Author
Organization

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Chicago
Mijten, Peter, Aart de Kruif, GC VANDERWEYDEN, and Hubert Deluyker. 1997. “Comparison of Catgut and Polyglactin 910 for Uterine Sutures During Bovine Caesarean Sections.” Veterinary Record 140 (17): 458–459.
APA
Mijten, P., de Kruif, A., VANDERWEYDEN, G., & Deluyker, H. (1997). Comparison of catgut and polyglactin 910 for uterine sutures during bovine caesarean sections. VETERINARY RECORD, 140(17), 458–459.
Vancouver
1.
Mijten P, de Kruif A, VANDERWEYDEN G, Deluyker H. Comparison of catgut and polyglactin 910 for uterine sutures during bovine caesarean sections. VETERINARY RECORD. 1997;140(17):458–9.
MLA
Mijten, Peter, Aart de Kruif, GC VANDERWEYDEN, et al. “Comparison of Catgut and Polyglactin 910 for Uterine Sutures During Bovine Caesarean Sections.” VETERINARY RECORD 140.17 (1997): 458–459. Print.
@article{183161,
  author       = {Mijten, Peter and de Kruif, Aart and VANDERWEYDEN, GC and Deluyker, Hubert},
  issn         = {0042-4900},
  journal      = {VETERINARY RECORD},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {17},
  pages        = {458--459},
  title        = {Comparison of catgut and polyglactin 910 for uterine sutures during bovine caesarean sections.},
  volume       = {140},
  year         = {1997},
}