Advanced search

Difference between TE and TM modal gain in amplifying waveguides: Analysis and assessment of two perturbation approaches.

Author
Organization

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Chicago
Haes, Jan, Bart Demeulenaere, Roel Baets, D LENSTRA, TD VISSER, and H BLOK. 1997. “Difference Between TE and TM Modal Gain in Amplifying Waveguides: Analysis and Assessment of Two Perturbation Approaches.” Optical and Quantum Electronics 29 (2): 263–273.
APA
Haes, J., Demeulenaere, B., Baets, R., LENSTRA, D., VISSER, T., & BLOK, H. (1997). Difference between TE and TM modal gain in amplifying waveguides: Analysis and assessment of two perturbation approaches. OPTICAL AND QUANTUM ELECTRONICS, 29(2), 263–273.
Vancouver
1.
Haes J, Demeulenaere B, Baets R, LENSTRA D, VISSER T, BLOK H. Difference between TE and TM modal gain in amplifying waveguides: Analysis and assessment of two perturbation approaches. OPTICAL AND QUANTUM ELECTRONICS. 1997;29(2):263–73.
MLA
Haes, Jan, Bart Demeulenaere, Roel Baets, et al. “Difference Between TE and TM Modal Gain in Amplifying Waveguides: Analysis and Assessment of Two Perturbation Approaches.” OPTICAL AND QUANTUM ELECTRONICS 29.2 (1997): 263–273. Print.
@article{182603,
  author       = {Haes, Jan and Demeulenaere, Bart and Baets, Roel and LENSTRA, D and VISSER, TD and BLOK, H},
  issn         = {0306-8919},
  journal      = {OPTICAL AND QUANTUM ELECTRONICS},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {2},
  pages        = {263--273},
  title        = {Difference between TE and TM modal gain in amplifying waveguides: Analysis and assessment of two perturbation approaches.},
  volume       = {29},
  year         = {1997},
}