Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Genome annotation: which tools do we have for it?

Pierre Rouzé, Nathalie Pavy and Stephane Rombauts UGent (1999) CURRENT OPINION IN PLANT BIOLOGY. 2(2). p.90-95
abstract
Genome data have to be converted into knowledge to be useful to biologists. Many valuable computational tools have already been developed to help annotation of plant genome sequences, and these may be improved further, for example by identification of more gene regulatory elements. The lack of a standard computer-assisted annotation platform for eukaryotic genomes remains a major bottle-neck.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (review)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
IDENTIFICATION, DNA-SEQUENCES, PREDICTION, RECOGNITION, DATABASES, SPLICED ALIGNMENT, SEQUENCE ANNOTATION, ARABIDOPSIS-THALIANA, PRE-MESSENGER-RNA, TRANSFER-RNA GENES
journal title
CURRENT OPINION IN PLANT BIOLOGY
Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.
volume
2
issue
2
pages
90 - 95
Web of Science type
Review
Web of Science id
000079695500004
ISSN
1369-5266
DOI
10.1016/S1369-5266(99)80019-3
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
173853
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-173853
date created
2004-01-14 13:40:00
date last changed
2016-12-19 15:38:43
@article{173853,
  abstract     = {Genome data have to be converted into knowledge to be useful to biologists. Many valuable computational tools have already been developed to help annotation of plant genome sequences, and these may be improved further, for example by identification of more gene regulatory elements. The lack of a standard computer-assisted annotation platform for eukaryotic genomes remains a major bottle-neck.},
  author       = {Rouz{\'e}, Pierre and Pavy, Nathalie and Rombauts, Stephane},
  issn         = {1369-5266},
  journal      = {CURRENT OPINION IN PLANT BIOLOGY},
  keyword      = {IDENTIFICATION,DNA-SEQUENCES,PREDICTION,RECOGNITION,DATABASES,SPLICED ALIGNMENT,SEQUENCE ANNOTATION,ARABIDOPSIS-THALIANA,PRE-MESSENGER-RNA,TRANSFER-RNA GENES},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {2},
  pages        = {90--95},
  title        = {Genome annotation: which tools do we have for it?},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5266(99)80019-3},
  volume       = {2},
  year         = {1999},
}

Chicago
Rouzé, Pierre, Nathalie Pavy, and Stephane Rombauts. 1999. “Genome Annotation: Which Tools Do We Have for It?” Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2 (2): 90–95.
APA
Rouzé, P., Pavy, N., & Rombauts, S. (1999). Genome annotation: which tools do we have for it? CURRENT OPINION IN PLANT BIOLOGY, 2(2), 90–95.
Vancouver
1.
Rouzé P, Pavy N, Rombauts S. Genome annotation: which tools do we have for it? CURRENT OPINION IN PLANT BIOLOGY. 1999;2(2):90–5.
MLA
Rouzé, Pierre, Nathalie Pavy, and Stephane Rombauts. “Genome Annotation: Which Tools Do We Have for It?” CURRENT OPINION IN PLANT BIOLOGY 2.2 (1999): 90–95. Print.