Advanced search

On the difficulty of distinguishing "good" and "poor" perceivers: A social relations analysis of empathic accuracy data.

(2000) PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS. 7(2). p.219-234
Author
Organization

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Chicago
ICKES, W, Ann Buysse, H PHAM, K RIVERS, JR ERICKSON, M HANCOCK, J KELLEHER, and PR GESN. 2000. “On the Difficulty of Distinguishing ‘Good’ and ‘Poor’ Perceivers: A Social Relations Analysis of Empathic Accuracy Data.” Personal Relationships 7 (2): 219–234.
APA
ICKES, W., Buysse, A., PHAM, H., RIVERS, K., ERICKSON, J., HANCOCK, M., KELLEHER, J., et al. (2000). On the difficulty of distinguishing “good” and “poor” perceivers: A social relations analysis of empathic accuracy data. PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 7(2), 219–234.
Vancouver
1.
ICKES W, Buysse A, PHAM H, RIVERS K, ERICKSON J, HANCOCK M, et al. On the difficulty of distinguishing “good” and “poor” perceivers: A social relations analysis of empathic accuracy data. PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS. 2000;7(2):219–34.
MLA
ICKES, W, Ann Buysse, H PHAM, et al. “On the Difficulty of Distinguishing ‘Good’ and ‘Poor’ Perceivers: A Social Relations Analysis of Empathic Accuracy Data.” PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS 7.2 (2000): 219–234. Print.
@article{171236,
  author       = {ICKES, W and Buysse, Ann and PHAM, H and RIVERS, K and ERICKSON, JR and HANCOCK, M and KELLEHER, J and GESN, PR},
  issn         = {1350-4126},
  journal      = {PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {2},
  pages        = {219--234},
  title        = {On the difficulty of distinguishing {\textacutedbl}good{\textacutedbl} and {\textacutedbl}poor{\textacutedbl} perceivers: A social relations analysis of empathic accuracy data.},
  volume       = {7},
  year         = {2000},
}

Web of Science
Times cited: