Academic Bibliography

 Search 200 years of publications by Ghent University researchers.
Advanced search
Add to list
  1. Search results
  2. Why the logic of explanation is incon...

Why the logic of explanation is inconsistency-adaptive.

Erik Weber (UGent) and Kristof De Clercq (UGent)
(2002) Inconsistency in science. p.165-184
Author
Organization

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Weber, Erik, and Kristof De Clercq. “Why the Logic of Explanation Is Inconsistency-Adaptive.” Inconsistency in Science, Kluwer, 2002, pp. 165–84.
APA
Weber, E., & De Clercq, K. (2002). Why the logic of explanation is inconsistency-adaptive. In Inconsistency in science (pp. 165–184). Kluwer.
Chicago author-date
Weber, Erik, and Kristof De Clercq. 2002. “Why the Logic of Explanation Is Inconsistency-Adaptive.” In Inconsistency in Science, 165–84. Kluwer.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Weber, Erik, and Kristof De Clercq. 2002. “Why the Logic of Explanation Is Inconsistency-Adaptive.” In Inconsistency in Science, 165–184. Kluwer.
Vancouver
1.
Weber E, De Clercq K. Why the logic of explanation is inconsistency-adaptive. In: Inconsistency in science. Kluwer; 2002. p. 165–84.
IEEE
[1]
E. Weber and K. De Clercq, “Why the logic of explanation is inconsistency-adaptive.,” in Inconsistency in science, Kluwer, 2002, pp. 165–184.
@incollection{152663,
  author       = {{Weber, Erik and De Clercq, Kristof}},
  booktitle    = {{Inconsistency in science}},
  isbn         = {{1-4020-0630-6}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{165--184}},
  publisher    = {{Kluwer}},
  title        = {{Why the logic of explanation is inconsistency-adaptive.}},
  year         = {{2002}},
}