Advanced search
1 file | 275.60 KB

Evolution and rape: a feminist Darwinian perspective

(2011) SEX ROLES. 64(9). p.732-747
Author
Organization
Abstract
It is commonly thought that feminist and evolutionary explanations of rape cannot be integrated. As I aim to show, this view is incorrect. Although feminist and evolutionary approaches are not compatible on all fronts, theories incorporating factors from both perspectives have been proposed, on theoretical as well as empirical grounds. Unfortunately, the debate between feminist and evolutionary scholars is frequently characterized by a lack of mutual openness and by the use of illegitimate arguments. The book A Natural History of Rape (Thornhill and Palmer 2000), and the controversy it provoked, is a case in point. I will highlight a more productive interaction of both perspectives by discussing the work of the feminist evolutionary biologist Barbara Smuts.
Keywords
MENS COERCIVE SEXUALITY, PAIN FOLLOWING RAPE, HYPOTHESIS, AGGRESSORS, WOMEN, MODEL, Rape, Feminism, Evolution, Dominance, Control

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 275.60 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Chicago
Vandermassen, Griet. 2011. “Evolution and Rape: a Feminist Darwinian Perspective.” Sex Roles 64 (9): 732–747.
APA
Vandermassen, Griet. (2011). Evolution and rape: a feminist Darwinian perspective. SEX ROLES, 64(9), 732–747.
Vancouver
1.
Vandermassen G. Evolution and rape: a feminist Darwinian perspective. SEX ROLES. 2011;64(9):732–47.
MLA
Vandermassen, Griet. “Evolution and Rape: a Feminist Darwinian Perspective.” SEX ROLES 64.9 (2011): 732–747. Print.
@article{1258650,
  abstract     = {It is commonly thought that feminist and evolutionary explanations of rape cannot be integrated. As I aim to show, this view is incorrect. Although feminist and evolutionary approaches are not compatible on all fronts, theories incorporating factors from both perspectives have been proposed, on theoretical as well as empirical grounds. Unfortunately, the debate between feminist and evolutionary scholars is frequently characterized by a lack of mutual openness and by the use of illegitimate arguments. The book A Natural History of Rape (Thornhill and Palmer 2000), and the controversy it provoked, is a case in point. I will highlight a more productive interaction of both perspectives by discussing the work of the feminist evolutionary biologist Barbara Smuts.},
  author       = {Vandermassen, Griet},
  issn         = {0360-0025},
  journal      = {SEX ROLES},
  keyword      = {MENS COERCIVE SEXUALITY,PAIN FOLLOWING RAPE,HYPOTHESIS,AGGRESSORS,WOMEN,MODEL,Rape,Feminism,Evolution,Dominance,Control},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {9},
  pages        = {732--747},
  title        = {Evolution and rape: a feminist Darwinian perspective},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9895-y},
  volume       = {64},
  year         = {2011},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: