Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Evolution of femoral condylar ossification at MR imaging: frequency and patient age distribution

Lennart Jans UGent, Jacob L Jaremko, Michael Ditchfield and Koenraad Verstraete UGent (2011) RADIOLOGY. 258(3). p.880-888
abstract
Purpose: To determine how the magnetic resonance (MR) signal intensity seen with variability in distal femoral epiphyseal ossification in children varies with (a) age, (b) sex, (c) distribution to the medial or lateral condyles, and (d) residual physeal cartilage. Materials and Methods: Ethics committee approval was obtained, and informed patient consent was waived. Two pediatric radiologists retrospectively reviewed the consecutive knee MR imaging studies of 910 children (457 boys, 453 girls; age range, 0.7-16.9 years) for variability in ossification and categorized the variability as preossification center, early ossification center, puzzle piece, incomplete puzzle piece, spiculation, or accessory ossification center. Patient age and sex, ossification variability site, residual physeal cartilage, and associated findings were analyzed. Basic descriptive statistical analysis, Student t tests for comparison of continuous variables, and k statistics analysis of interobserver agreement were performed where appropriate. Results: In 202 (22.2%) patients (278 condyles), ossification variability was present. In the 910 patients, early ossification center (n = 172, 18.9%) and spiculated configuration of the secondary ossification center (n = 151, 16.6%) were the most common variants. Preossification center (50 [5.5%] patients), puzzle piece (26 [2.9%] patients), accessory ossification center (nine [1.0%] patients), and incomplete puzzle piece (two [0.2%] patients) were seen less often. Ossification variability was more common in the medial condyles (169 [18.6%] of 910 cases) than in the lateral condyles (109 [12.0%] of 910 cases), nearly always posteriorly located (277 [99.6%] of 278 condyles), and more common in boys (153/457 [33.5%]) than in girls (49/453 [10.8%]). Ossification variability was less common with decreasing residual physeal cartilage. Peak patient age ranges for ossification variability were 2-12 years for boys and 2-10 years for girls. Conclusion: Ossification variability in the femoral condyles is common in children and should not be confused with abnormal processes. (C)RSNA, 2010
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
KNEE, OSTEOCHONDRITIS-DISSECANS, MATURATION, EPIPHYSES, CARTILAGE
journal title
RADIOLOGY
Radiology
volume
258
issue
3
pages
880 - 888
Web of Science type
Article
Web of Science id
000287573100025
JCR category
RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
JCR impact factor
5.726 (2011)
JCR rank
5/116 (2011)
JCR quartile
1 (2011)
ISSN
0033-8419
DOI
10.1148/radiol.10101103
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
1257489
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-1257489
date created
2011-06-08 11:58:30
date last changed
2016-12-19 15:46:35
@article{1257489,
  abstract     = {Purpose: To determine how the magnetic resonance (MR) signal intensity seen with variability in distal femoral epiphyseal ossification in children varies with (a) age, (b) sex, (c) distribution to the medial or lateral condyles, and (d) residual physeal cartilage. Materials and Methods: Ethics committee approval was obtained, and informed patient consent was waived. Two pediatric radiologists retrospectively reviewed the consecutive knee MR imaging studies of 910 children (457 boys, 453 girls; age range, 0.7-16.9 years) for variability in ossification and categorized the variability as preossification center, early ossification center, puzzle piece, incomplete puzzle piece, spiculation, or accessory ossification center. Patient age and sex, ossification variability site, residual physeal cartilage, and associated findings were analyzed. Basic descriptive statistical analysis, Student t tests for comparison of continuous variables, and k statistics analysis of interobserver agreement were performed where appropriate. Results: In 202 (22.2\%) patients (278 condyles), ossification variability was present. In the 910 patients, early ossification center (n = 172, 18.9\%) and spiculated configuration of the secondary ossification center (n = 151, 16.6\%) were the most common variants. Preossification center (50 [5.5\%] patients), puzzle piece (26 [2.9\%] patients), accessory ossification center (nine [1.0\%] patients), and incomplete puzzle piece (two [0.2\%] patients) were seen less often. Ossification variability was more common in the medial condyles (169 [18.6\%] of 910 cases) than in the lateral condyles (109 [12.0\%] of 910 cases), nearly always posteriorly located (277 [99.6\%] of 278 condyles), and more common in boys (153/457 [33.5\%]) than in girls (49/453 [10.8\%]). Ossification variability was less common with decreasing residual physeal cartilage. Peak patient age ranges for ossification variability were 2-12 years for boys and 2-10 years for girls. Conclusion: Ossification variability in the femoral condyles is common in children and should not be confused with abnormal processes. (C)RSNA, 2010},
  author       = {Jans, Lennart and Jaremko, Jacob L and Ditchfield, Michael and Verstraete, Koenraad},
  issn         = {0033-8419},
  journal      = {RADIOLOGY},
  keyword      = {KNEE,OSTEOCHONDRITIS-DISSECANS,MATURATION,EPIPHYSES,CARTILAGE},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {3},
  pages        = {880--888},
  title        = {Evolution of femoral condylar ossification at MR imaging: frequency and patient age distribution},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10101103},
  volume       = {258},
  year         = {2011},
}

Chicago
Jans, Lennart, Jacob L Jaremko, Michael Ditchfield, and Koenraad Verstraete. 2011. “Evolution of Femoral Condylar Ossification at MR Imaging: Frequency and Patient Age Distribution.” Radiology 258 (3): 880–888.
APA
Jans, L., Jaremko, J. L., Ditchfield, M., & Verstraete, K. (2011). Evolution of femoral condylar ossification at MR imaging: frequency and patient age distribution. RADIOLOGY, 258(3), 880–888.
Vancouver
1.
Jans L, Jaremko JL, Ditchfield M, Verstraete K. Evolution of femoral condylar ossification at MR imaging: frequency and patient age distribution. RADIOLOGY. 2011;258(3):880–8.
MLA
Jans, Lennart, Jacob L Jaremko, Michael Ditchfield, et al. “Evolution of Femoral Condylar Ossification at MR Imaging: Frequency and Patient Age Distribution.” RADIOLOGY 258.3 (2011): 880–888. Print.