Fairness as social responsibility: a moral self-regulation account of procedural justice enactment
- Author
- Lieven Brebels (UGent) , David De Cremer, Marius Van Dijke and Alain Van Hiel (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- Three studies examined the relationship between moral identity and procedural justice enactment and explored the moderating role of regulatory focus in this relationship. In Study 1, an experimental scenario study, leaders with a strong moral identity were more likely to enact decisions accurately in an employee performance evaluation procedure. This effect emerged in the prevention focus condition, but was absent in the promotion focus condition. In Study 2, an organizational field survey, organizational supervisors' moral identity related to self-reported voice granting, and this effect was pronounced among those with strong (as opposed to weak) dispositional prevention focus. In Study 3, another field study, organizational supervisors' moral identity related to co-worker ratings of voice granting and this effect was again pronounced among supervisors with strong (as opposed to weak) prevention focus. Implications of these findings are discussed in terms of a moral self-regulation account of justice enactment.
- Keywords
- MODEL, IDENTITY, PREVENTION, MOTIVATION, MANAGEMENT, FOCUS, BUSINESS ETHICS, DECISION-MAKING, ETHICAL LEADERSHIP, ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 213.21 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-1255506
- MLA
- Brebels, Lieven, et al. “Fairness as Social Responsibility: A Moral Self-Regulation Account of Procedural Justice Enactment.” BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, vol. 22, no. Suppl. 1, 2011, pp. S47–58, doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00715.x.
- APA
- Brebels, L., De Cremer, D., Van Dijke, M., & Van Hiel, A. (2011). Fairness as social responsibility: a moral self-regulation account of procedural justice enactment. BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 22(Suppl. 1), S47–S58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00715.x
- Chicago author-date
- Brebels, Lieven, David De Cremer, Marius Van Dijke, and Alain Van Hiel. 2011. “Fairness as Social Responsibility: A Moral Self-Regulation Account of Procedural Justice Enactment.” BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT 22 (Suppl. 1): S47–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00715.x.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Brebels, Lieven, David De Cremer, Marius Van Dijke, and Alain Van Hiel. 2011. “Fairness as Social Responsibility: A Moral Self-Regulation Account of Procedural Justice Enactment.” BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT 22 (Suppl. 1): S47–S58. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00715.x.
- Vancouver
- 1.Brebels L, De Cremer D, Van Dijke M, Van Hiel A. Fairness as social responsibility: a moral self-regulation account of procedural justice enactment. BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT. 2011;22(Suppl. 1):S47–58.
- IEEE
- [1]L. Brebels, D. De Cremer, M. Van Dijke, and A. Van Hiel, “Fairness as social responsibility: a moral self-regulation account of procedural justice enactment,” BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, vol. 22, no. Suppl. 1, pp. S47–S58, 2011.
@article{1255506,
abstract = {{Three studies examined the relationship between moral identity and procedural justice enactment and explored the moderating role of regulatory focus in this relationship. In Study 1, an experimental scenario study, leaders with a strong moral identity were more likely to enact decisions accurately in an employee performance evaluation procedure. This effect emerged in the prevention focus condition, but was absent in the promotion focus condition. In Study 2, an organizational field survey, organizational supervisors' moral identity related to self-reported voice granting, and this effect was pronounced among those with strong (as opposed to weak) dispositional prevention focus. In Study 3, another field study, organizational supervisors' moral identity related to co-worker ratings of voice granting and this effect was again pronounced among supervisors with strong (as opposed to weak) prevention focus. Implications of these findings are discussed in terms of a moral self-regulation account of justice enactment.}},
author = {{Brebels, Lieven and De Cremer, David and Van Dijke, Marius and Van Hiel, Alain}},
issn = {{1045-3172}},
journal = {{BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT}},
keywords = {{MODEL,IDENTITY,PREVENTION,MOTIVATION,MANAGEMENT,FOCUS,BUSINESS ETHICS,DECISION-MAKING,ETHICAL LEADERSHIP,ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{Suppl. 1}},
pages = {{S47--S58}},
title = {{Fairness as social responsibility: a moral self-regulation account of procedural justice enactment}},
url = {{http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00715.x}},
volume = {{22}},
year = {{2011}},
}
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: