Advanced search
1 file | 124.30 KB

The determinants of overeducation: different measures, different outcomes?

Dieter Verhaest (UGent) and Eddy Omey (UGent)
Author
Organization
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to assess the measurement sensitivity of the estimated determinants of overeducation. Design/methodology/approach - The paper analyses the determinants of overeducation among Flemish school leavers in their first job by means of probit regression analysis. Overeducation is measured on the basis of job analysis (JA), self-assessments and realised matches. Findings - The results demonstrate that the application of different overeducation measures sometimes leads to different outcomes. Only a few variables - for instance the student's academic grade in the final year - are consistently found to be important for the explanation of overeducation. Some outcomes are consistent with the supposition that several indicators actually measure other concepts. Research limitations/implications - Further research using JA measures that are based on alternative and more recent occupational classifications would be useful. Originality/value - The application of different measures provides further insight into the overeducation measurement problem.
Keywords
EARNINGS, BRITAIN, IMPACT, Qualifications, WOMEN, Education, Jobs, Job analysis, School leavers, UNDEREDUCATION, Belgium, MINORITIES, LABOR-MARKET, OVER-EDUCATION, SKILL MISMATCHES

Downloads

    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 124.30 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Chicago
Verhaest, Dieter, and Eddy Omey. 2010. “The Determinants of Overeducation: Different Measures, Different Outcomes?” International Journal of Manpower 31 (6): 608–625.
APA
Verhaest, D., & Omey, E. (2010). The determinants of overeducation: different measures, different outcomes? INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANPOWER, 31(6), 608–625.
Vancouver
1.
Verhaest D, Omey E. The determinants of overeducation: different measures, different outcomes? INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANPOWER. 2010;31(6):608–25.
MLA
Verhaest, Dieter, and Eddy Omey. “The Determinants of Overeducation: Different Measures, Different Outcomes?” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANPOWER 31.6 (2010): 608–625. Print.
@article{1224457,
  abstract     = {Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to assess the measurement sensitivity of the estimated determinants of overeducation. Design/methodology/approach - The paper analyses the determinants of overeducation among Flemish school leavers in their first job by means of probit regression analysis. Overeducation is measured on the basis of job analysis (JA), self-assessments and realised matches. Findings - The results demonstrate that the application of different overeducation measures sometimes leads to different outcomes. Only a few variables - for instance the student's academic grade in the final year - are consistently found to be important for the explanation of overeducation. Some outcomes are consistent with the supposition that several indicators actually measure other concepts. Research limitations/implications - Further research using JA measures that are based on alternative and more recent occupational classifications would be useful. Originality/value - The application of different measures provides further insight into the overeducation measurement problem.},
  author       = {Verhaest, Dieter and Omey, Eddy},
  issn         = {0143-7720},
  journal      = {INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANPOWER},
  keyword      = {EARNINGS,BRITAIN,IMPACT,Qualifications,WOMEN,Education,Jobs,Job analysis,School leavers,UNDEREDUCATION,Belgium,MINORITIES,LABOR-MARKET,OVER-EDUCATION,SKILL MISMATCHES},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {6},
  pages        = {608--625},
  title        = {The determinants of overeducation: different measures, different outcomes?},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437721011073337},
  volume       = {31},
  year         = {2010},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: