Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Construct validation and internal consistency of the geometric categorization task (GEOCAT) for measuring primary and secundary processes

Stijn Vanheule UGent, Bjorn Roelstraete, Filip Geerardyn UGent, Clare Murphy UGent, Ariane Bazan and Linda Brakel (2011) PSYCHOANALYTIC PSYCHOLOGY. 28(2). p.209-228
abstract
The GEOCAT is a short nonverbal test for measuring two types of cognition that tally with Freud's distinction between primary and secondary unconscious processes: attributional and relational similarity judgment. Attributional similarity judgment is a mode of cognitive categorization in which stimuli are classified based on perceptual resemblances between attributes and features, just like in primary processing. Relational similarity judgment is a mode of cognitive categorization that builds on higher order relationships between stimuli, just like in secondary processing. The GEOCAT can be used in diverse research contexts, and test administration takes 2 minutes. The present study investigates the construct validity and internal consistency of this instrument in a sample of Belgian university students. A confirmatory factor analysis for binary items indicates that a dimension reflecting relational or attributional categorization processes lies behind the GEOCAT items, that this model has a good fit to the data, and that all items are equally good indicators of these processes. We also compared the GEOCAT to an alternative measure that builds on a continuous scale for similarity judgment. Correlations between corresponding subscales were moderate and three GEOCAT items proved to be problematic. Internal consistency proved to be good. Suggestions for future research on similarity judgment and primary and secondary processes are discussed.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
unconscious, categorization, assessment, decision making, THINKING
journal title
PSYCHOANALYTIC PSYCHOLOGY
Psychoanal. psychol.
volume
28
issue
2
pages
209 - 228
Web of Science type
Article
Web of Science id
000289699900004
JCR category
PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS
JCR impact factor
0.827 (2011)
JCR rank
3/13 (2011)
JCR quartile
1 (2011)
ISSN
0736-9735
DOI
10.1037/a0022392
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
1212673
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-1212673
date created
2011-04-27 10:33:10
date last changed
2016-12-19 15:45:12
@article{1212673,
  abstract     = {The GEOCAT is a short nonverbal test for measuring two types of cognition that tally with Freud's distinction between primary and secondary unconscious processes: attributional and relational similarity judgment. Attributional similarity judgment is a mode of cognitive categorization in which stimuli are classified based on perceptual resemblances between attributes and features, just like in primary processing. Relational similarity judgment is a mode of cognitive categorization that builds on higher order relationships between stimuli, just like in secondary processing. The GEOCAT can be used in diverse research contexts, and test administration takes 2 minutes. The present study investigates the construct validity and internal consistency of this instrument in a sample of Belgian university students. A confirmatory factor analysis for binary items indicates that a dimension reflecting relational or attributional categorization processes lies behind the GEOCAT items, that this model has a good fit to the data, and that all items are equally good indicators of these processes. We also compared the GEOCAT to an alternative measure that builds on a continuous scale for similarity judgment. Correlations between corresponding subscales were moderate and three GEOCAT items proved to be problematic. Internal consistency proved to be good. Suggestions for future research on similarity judgment and primary and secondary processes are discussed.},
  author       = {Vanheule, Stijn and Roelstraete, Bjorn and Geerardyn, Filip and Murphy, Clare and Bazan, Ariane and Brakel, Linda},
  issn         = {0736-9735},
  journal      = {PSYCHOANALYTIC PSYCHOLOGY},
  keyword      = {unconscious,categorization,assessment,decision making,THINKING},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {2},
  pages        = {209--228},
  title        = {Construct validation and internal consistency of the geometric categorization task (GEOCAT) for measuring primary and secundary processes},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0022392},
  volume       = {28},
  year         = {2011},
}

Chicago
Vanheule, Stijn, Bjorn Roelstraete, Filip Geerardyn, Clare Murphy, Ariane Bazan, and Linda Brakel. 2011. “Construct Validation and Internal Consistency of the Geometric Categorization Task (GEOCAT) for Measuring Primary and Secundary Processes.” Psychoanalytic Psychology 28 (2): 209–228.
APA
Vanheule, S., Roelstraete, B., Geerardyn, F., Murphy, C., Bazan, A., & Brakel, L. (2011). Construct validation and internal consistency of the geometric categorization task (GEOCAT) for measuring primary and secundary processes. PSYCHOANALYTIC PSYCHOLOGY, 28(2), 209–228.
Vancouver
1.
Vanheule S, Roelstraete B, Geerardyn F, Murphy C, Bazan A, Brakel L. Construct validation and internal consistency of the geometric categorization task (GEOCAT) for measuring primary and secundary processes. PSYCHOANALYTIC PSYCHOLOGY. 2011;28(2):209–28.
MLA
Vanheule, Stijn, Bjorn Roelstraete, Filip Geerardyn, et al. “Construct Validation and Internal Consistency of the Geometric Categorization Task (GEOCAT) for Measuring Primary and Secundary Processes.” PSYCHOANALYTIC PSYCHOLOGY 28.2 (2011): 209–228. Print.