Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

A comparison of MS2-based label-free quantitative proteomic techniques with regards to accuracy and precision

Niklaas Colaert UGent, Joël Vandekerckhove, Kris Gevaert UGent and Lennart Martens UGent (2011) PROTEOMICS. 11(6). p.1110-1113
abstract
The advent of algorithms for fragmentation spectrum-based label-free quantitative proteomics has enabled straightforward quantification of shotgun proteomic experiments. Despite the popularity of these approaches, few studies have been performed to assess their performance. We have therefore profiled the precision and the accuracy of three distinct relative label-free methods on both the protein and the proteome level. We derived our test data from two well-characterized publicly available quantitative data sets.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
PROTEIN, QUANTIFICATION, Quantitative proteomics, Quality control, Precision, Label free, Bioinformatics, Accuracy, QUANTIFICATION, PROTEIN
journal title
PROTEOMICS
Proteomics
volume
11
issue
6
pages
1110 - 1113
Web of Science type
Article
Web of Science id
000288137700013
JCR category
BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
JCR impact factor
4.505 (2011)
JCR rank
14/72 (2011)
JCR quartile
1 (2011)
ISSN
1615-9853
DOI
10.1002/pmic.201000521
project
Bioinformatics: from nucleotids to networks (N2N)
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
1197739
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-1197739
date created
2011-03-28 11:04:17
date last changed
2016-12-19 15:46:32
@article{1197739,
  abstract     = {The advent of algorithms for fragmentation spectrum-based label-free quantitative proteomics has enabled straightforward quantification of shotgun proteomic experiments. Despite the popularity of these approaches, few studies have been performed to assess their performance. We have therefore profiled the precision and the accuracy of three distinct relative label-free methods on both the protein and the proteome level. We derived our test data from two well-characterized publicly available quantitative data sets.},
  author       = {Colaert, Niklaas and Vandekerckhove, Jo{\"e}l and Gevaert, Kris and Martens, Lennart},
  issn         = {1615-9853},
  journal      = {PROTEOMICS},
  keyword      = {PROTEIN,QUANTIFICATION,Quantitative proteomics,Quality control,Precision,Label free,Bioinformatics,Accuracy,QUANTIFICATION,PROTEIN},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {6},
  pages        = {1110--1113},
  title        = {A comparison of MS2-based label-free quantitative proteomic techniques with regards to accuracy and precision},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201000521},
  volume       = {11},
  year         = {2011},
}

Chicago
Colaert, Niklaas, Joël Vandekerckhove, Kris Gevaert, and Lennart Martens. 2011. “A Comparison of MS2-based Label-free Quantitative Proteomic Techniques with Regards to Accuracy and Precision.” Proteomics 11 (6): 1110–1113.
APA
Colaert, N., Vandekerckhove, J., Gevaert, K., & Martens, L. (2011). A comparison of MS2-based label-free quantitative proteomic techniques with regards to accuracy and precision. PROTEOMICS, 11(6), 1110–1113.
Vancouver
1.
Colaert N, Vandekerckhove J, Gevaert K, Martens L. A comparison of MS2-based label-free quantitative proteomic techniques with regards to accuracy and precision. PROTEOMICS. 2011;11(6):1110–3.
MLA
Colaert, Niklaas, Joël Vandekerckhove, Kris Gevaert, et al. “A Comparison of MS2-based Label-free Quantitative Proteomic Techniques with Regards to Accuracy and Precision.” PROTEOMICS 11.6 (2011): 1110–1113. Print.