Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Survey of egg producers on the introduction of alternative housing systems for laying hens in Flanders, Belgium

Frank Tuyttens, Bart Sonck, Machteld Staes, Tom Van den Bogaert and Bart Ampe UGent (2011) POULTRY SCIENCE. 90(4). p.941-950
abstract
In the context of the European Union ban on battery cages by 2012, a survey was conducted among Flemish egg producers (60%. response rate, 140 completed questionnaires) about the introduction and opinion of alternative housing systems. Belgium appears to be among the countries in the European Union that are slower to adopt alternative housing. Belgium's egg industry is thus likely to undergo drastic changes to comply with the 2012 deadline. As of 2010, the battery cage was the dominant housing system (56% housing units, 67% hens), followed by floor housing (33% housing units, 15% hens) and aviary (10% housing units, 15% hens), whereas colony cages and furnished cages were extremely rare. Future- and market-oriented production was the most important reason for choosing a certain type of alternative system, although the importance of hen performance and amount of labor seemed to increase. A quarter of the producers with battery cages had detailed plans to convert to an alternative system (most planned to install aviaries, followed by colony cages, furnished cages, and floor housing) by 2012. Many older farmers indicated that they would stop farming, whereas others found it more profitable to delay the conversion as long as possible. Apart from hen welfare, producers expressed a negative opinion (relative to battery cages) about noncage systems and, to a lesser extent, furnished cages. However, users of alternative systems reported being quite satisfied, except for the amount of labor and hen health. The housing system had several effects on user satisfaction: positive effect of flock size, negative effect of experience with battery cages, and negative effect of outdoor area on hen health. Although not all opinions were supported by evidence, such surveys provide feedback about the success of alternative systems in practice. This information is valuable to further improve these systems and to producers who have yet to convert. Moreover, producer attitude may determine the extent to which legally imposed changes in husbandry environment result in the desired improvement of hen welfare in practice.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
aviary, furnished cage, egg producer, MANAGEMENT, SIZE, FEATHER PECKING, laying hen, survey, WELFARE ASSESSMENT, NON-CAGE SYSTEMS
journal title
POULTRY SCIENCE
Poult. Sci.
volume
90
issue
4
pages
941 - 950
Web of Science type
Article
Web of Science id
000289007100030
JCR category
AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
JCR impact factor
1.728 (2011)
JCR rank
9/54 (2011)
JCR quartile
1 (2011)
ISSN
0032-5791
DOI
10.3382/ps.2010-01122
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
1193664
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-1193664
date created
2011-03-22 10:59:13
date last changed
2015-06-17 09:30:52
@article{1193664,
  abstract     = {In the context of the European Union ban on battery cages by 2012, a survey was conducted among Flemish egg producers (60\%. response rate, 140 completed questionnaires) about the introduction and opinion of alternative housing systems. Belgium appears to be among the countries in the European Union that are slower to adopt alternative housing. Belgium's egg industry is thus likely to undergo drastic changes to comply with the 2012 deadline. As of 2010, the battery cage was the dominant housing system (56\% housing units, 67\% hens), followed by floor housing (33\% housing units, 15\% hens) and aviary (10\% housing units, 15\% hens), whereas colony cages and furnished cages were extremely rare. Future- and market-oriented production was the most important reason for choosing a certain type of alternative system, although the importance of hen performance and amount of labor seemed to increase. A quarter of the producers with battery cages had detailed plans to convert to an alternative system (most planned to install aviaries, followed by colony cages, furnished cages, and floor housing) by 2012. Many older farmers indicated that they would stop farming, whereas others found it more profitable to delay the conversion as long as possible. Apart from hen welfare, producers expressed a negative opinion (relative to battery cages) about noncage systems and, to a lesser extent, furnished cages. However, users of alternative systems reported being quite satisfied, except for the amount of labor and hen health. The housing system had several effects on user satisfaction: positive effect of flock size, negative effect of experience with battery cages, and negative effect of outdoor area on hen health. Although not all opinions were supported by evidence, such surveys provide feedback about the success of alternative systems in practice. This information is valuable to further improve these systems and to producers who have yet to convert. Moreover, producer attitude may determine the extent to which legally imposed changes in husbandry environment result in the desired improvement of hen welfare in practice.},
  author       = {Tuyttens, Frank and Sonck, Bart and Staes, Machteld and Van den Bogaert, Tom and Ampe, Bart},
  issn         = {0032-5791},
  journal      = {POULTRY SCIENCE},
  keyword      = {aviary,furnished cage,egg producer,MANAGEMENT,SIZE,FEATHER PECKING,laying hen,survey,WELFARE ASSESSMENT,NON-CAGE SYSTEMS},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {4},
  pages        = {941--950},
  title        = {Survey of egg producers on the introduction of alternative housing systems for laying hens in Flanders, Belgium},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-01122},
  volume       = {90},
  year         = {2011},
}

Chicago
Tuyttens, Frank, Bart Sonck, Machteld Staes, Tom Van den Bogaert, and Bart Ampe. 2011. “Survey of Egg Producers on the Introduction of Alternative Housing Systems for Laying Hens in Flanders, Belgium.” Poultry Science 90 (4): 941–950.
APA
Tuyttens, Frank, Sonck, B., Staes, M., Van den Bogaert, T., & Ampe, B. (2011). Survey of egg producers on the introduction of alternative housing systems for laying hens in Flanders, Belgium. POULTRY SCIENCE, 90(4), 941–950.
Vancouver
1.
Tuyttens F, Sonck B, Staes M, Van den Bogaert T, Ampe B. Survey of egg producers on the introduction of alternative housing systems for laying hens in Flanders, Belgium. POULTRY SCIENCE. 2011;90(4):941–50.
MLA
Tuyttens, Frank, Bart Sonck, Machteld Staes, et al. “Survey of Egg Producers on the Introduction of Alternative Housing Systems for Laying Hens in Flanders, Belgium.” POULTRY SCIENCE 90.4 (2011): 941–950. Print.