Advanced search
Add to list

Utility and limitations of psychologic as a tool for theoretical analysis in cognitive psychology

Author
Organization
Keywords
INTERVAL

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Vandierendonck, André. “Utility and Limitations of Psychologic as a Tool for Theoretical Analysis in Cognitive Psychology.” SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 40, no. 4, 1999, pp. 95–98.
APA
Vandierendonck, A. (1999). Utility and limitations of psychologic as a tool for theoretical analysis in cognitive psychology. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 40(4), 95–98.
Chicago author-date
Vandierendonck, André. 1999. “Utility and Limitations of Psychologic as a Tool for Theoretical Analysis in Cognitive Psychology.” SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY 40 (4): 95–98.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Vandierendonck, André. 1999. “Utility and Limitations of Psychologic as a Tool for Theoretical Analysis in Cognitive Psychology.” SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY 40 (4): 95–98.
Vancouver
1.
Vandierendonck A. Utility and limitations of psychologic as a tool for theoretical analysis in cognitive psychology. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY. 1999;40(4):95–8.
IEEE
[1]
A. Vandierendonck, “Utility and limitations of psychologic as a tool for theoretical analysis in cognitive psychology,” SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 95–98, 1999.
@article{119358,
  author       = {{Vandierendonck, André}},
  issn         = {{0036-5564}},
  journal      = {{SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY}},
  keywords     = {{INTERVAL}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{95--98}},
  title        = {{Utility and limitations of psychologic as a tool for theoretical analysis in cognitive psychology}},
  volume       = {{40}},
  year         = {{1999}},
}

Web of Science
Times cited: