Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

A case-control study assessing oral-health-related quality of life after immediately loaded single implants in healed alveolar ridges or extraction sockets

Filiep Raes, Lyndon F Cooper, Luís Giner Tarrida, Heleen Vandromme and Hugo De Bruyn UGent (2012) CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH. 23(5). p.602-608
abstract
Introduction: Tooth loss reduces oral-health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) as assessed with the 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire (OHIP-14). Objectives: This prospective multicenter case-control study sought to (i) establish OHRQoL in patients requiring a single implant in the anterior maxilla and to (ii) compare these changes following implant placement and immediate provisionalization in extraction sockets with healed alveolar ridges up to 1 year. Material and methods: Ninety-six patients were enrolled in the study with 102 single implants (OsseoSpeedt AstraTech) provisionalized immediately after placement in sockets or after placement in healed ridges. A final crown was cemented after 12 weeks. OHIP-14 was registered before surgery (baseline), after 1 (provisional crown), 6 and 12 months (final crown). Repeated measures ANOVA was performed for the seven conceptual OHIP Domains, the treatment group (extraction site socket vs. healed alveolar ridge) and time as within subjects variables. Results: Two implants failed, 1/48 (2.1%) in the extraction group (n¼46 patients) and 1/54 (1.8%) in the healed ridge group (n¼50 patients). From 82 patients (87.5%), OHIP-14 was available at all time points. The overall OHIP-14 based on the mean of the seven domains increases between baseline and 6 months and remained stable afterward for the total study group and both treatment groups. Comparison between extraction and healed groups revealed no significant difference at baseline but the healed group showed a significantly higher improvement for functional limitation, physical disability, physical pain and psychological discomfort (Po0.05). Between baseline and 1 year in the healed bone group, all seven domains improved significantly compared with only three domains in the extraction group. However, the overall OHIP-14 score between groups was not substantially different. Hence, both treatment modalities lead to similar OHRQoL improvement. Conclusion: Patients in need of a single-tooth replacement have limited OHRQoL problems as reflected by the OHIP-14 score but improvements in several domains related to oral health were evaluated when implants were placed and provisionalized in healed bone and extraction sites.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
immediate loading, dental implants, immediate placement, OHIP-14, patient satisfaction, quality of life, PRIVATE DENTAL PRACTICES, IMPACT PROFILE OHIP, TOOTH RESTORATIONS, PATIENT, SATISFACTION, REHABILITATION, VALIDATION, PROSTHESES, DENTURES, THERAPY
journal title
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
Clin. Oral Implants Res.
volume
23
issue
5
pages
602 - 608
Web of Science type
Article
Web of Science id
000302606800012
JCR category
DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
JCR impact factor
3.433 (2012)
JCR rank
6/81 (2012)
JCR quartile
1 (2012)
ISSN
0905-7161
DOI
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02178.x
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
1167148
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-1167148
date created
2011-02-23 14:51:03
date last changed
2016-12-19 15:39:27
@article{1167148,
  abstract     = {Introduction: Tooth loss reduces oral-health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) as assessed with the 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire (OHIP-14).
Objectives: This prospective multicenter case-control study sought to (i) establish OHRQoL in patients requiring a single implant in the anterior maxilla and to (ii) compare these changes following implant placement and immediate provisionalization in extraction sockets with healed alveolar ridges up to 1 year.
Material and methods: Ninety-six patients were enrolled in the study with 102 single implants (OsseoSpeedt AstraTech) provisionalized immediately after placement in sockets or after placement in healed ridges. A final crown was cemented after 12 weeks. OHIP-14 was registered before surgery (baseline), after 1 (provisional crown), 6 and 12 months (final crown). Repeated measures ANOVA was performed for the seven conceptual OHIP Domains, the treatment group (extraction site socket vs. healed alveolar ridge) and time as within subjects variables.
Results: Two implants failed, 1/48 (2.1\%) in the extraction group (n{\textonequarter}46 patients) and 1/54 (1.8\%) in the healed ridge group (n{\textonequarter}50 patients). From 82 patients (87.5\%), OHIP-14 was available at all time points. The overall OHIP-14 based on the mean of the seven domains increases between baseline and 6 months and remained stable afterward for the total study group and both treatment groups. Comparison between extraction and healed groups revealed no significant difference at baseline but the healed group showed a significantly higher improvement for functional limitation, physical disability, physical pain and psychological discomfort (Po0.05). Between baseline and 1 year in the healed bone group, all seven domains improved significantly compared with only three domains in the extraction group. However, the overall OHIP-14 score between groups was not substantially different. Hence, both treatment modalities lead to similar OHRQoL improvement.
Conclusion: Patients in need of a single-tooth replacement have limited OHRQoL problems as reflected by the OHIP-14 score but improvements in several domains related to oral health were evaluated when implants were placed and provisionalized in healed bone and extraction sites.},
  author       = {Raes, Filiep and Cooper, Lyndon F and Giner Tarrida, Lu{\'i}s and Vandromme, Heleen and De Bruyn, Hugo},
  issn         = {0905-7161},
  journal      = {CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH},
  keyword      = {immediate loading,dental implants,immediate placement,OHIP-14,patient satisfaction,quality of life,PRIVATE DENTAL PRACTICES,IMPACT PROFILE OHIP,TOOTH RESTORATIONS,PATIENT,SATISFACTION,REHABILITATION,VALIDATION,PROSTHESES,DENTURES,THERAPY},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {5},
  pages        = {602--608},
  title        = {A case-control study assessing oral-health-related quality of life after immediately loaded single implants in healed alveolar ridges or extraction sockets},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02178.x},
  volume       = {23},
  year         = {2012},
}

Chicago
Raes, Filiep, Lyndon F Cooper, Luís Giner Tarrida, Heleen Vandromme, and Hugo De Bruyn. 2012. “A Case-control Study Assessing Oral-health-related Quality of Life After Immediately Loaded Single Implants in Healed Alveolar Ridges or Extraction Sockets.” Clinical Oral Implants Research 23 (5): 602–608.
APA
Raes, Filiep, Cooper, L. F., Giner Tarrida, L., Vandromme, H., & De Bruyn, H. (2012). A case-control study assessing oral-health-related quality of life after immediately loaded single implants in healed alveolar ridges or extraction sockets. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 23(5), 602–608.
Vancouver
1.
Raes F, Cooper LF, Giner Tarrida L, Vandromme H, De Bruyn H. A case-control study assessing oral-health-related quality of life after immediately loaded single implants in healed alveolar ridges or extraction sockets. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH. 2012;23(5):602–8.
MLA
Raes, Filiep, Lyndon F Cooper, Luís Giner Tarrida, et al. “A Case-control Study Assessing Oral-health-related Quality of Life After Immediately Loaded Single Implants in Healed Alveolar Ridges or Extraction Sockets.” CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH 23.5 (2012): 602–608. Print.