Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

The anatomy of the thoracic spinal canal in different postures: a magnetic resonance imaging investigation

Ruben A Lee, Andre AJ van Zundert, Charl P Botha, LM Arno Lataster, Adrien Van Zundert, Willem GJM van der Ham and Peter A Wieringa (2010) REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE. 35(4). p.364-369
abstract
Background and Objectives: The goal of this study was to investigate, with magnetic resonance imaging, the human anatomic positions of the spinal canal (eg, spinal cord, thecal tissue) in various postures and identify possible implications from different patient positioning for neuraxial anesthetic practice. Method: Nine volunteers underwent magnetic resonance imaging in supine, laterally recumbent, and sitting (head-down) positions. Axial and sagittal slices of the thoracic and lumbar spine were measured for the relative distances between anatomic structures, including dura mater and spinal cord. Results: The posterior dura spinal cord (midline) distance is on average greater than the anterior dura spinal cord (midline) distance along the thoracic spinal column, irrespective of volunteer postures (P < 0.05). The separation of the dura mater and spinal cord is greatest posterior in the middle thoracic region compared with upper and lower thoracic levels for all postures of the volunteers (P < 0.05). By placing the patient in a head-down sitting posture (as commonly done in epidural and spinal anesthesia), the posterior separation of the dura mater and spinal cord is increased. Conclusions: The spinal cord follows the straightest line through the imposed geometry of the spinal canal. Accordingly, there is relatively more posterior separation of the cord and surrounding thecal tissue at midthoracic levels in the apex of the thoracic kyphosis. Placing a patient in a position that accentuates the thoracic curvature of the spine (ie, sitting head-down) increases the posterior separation of the spinal cord and dural sheath at thoracic levels.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
DISEASE, POSITION
journal title
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE
Region. Anesth. Pain Med.
volume
35
issue
4
pages
6 pages
Web of Science type
Article
Web of Science id
000279643100010
JCR category
ANESTHESIOLOGY
JCR impact factor
2.807 (2010)
JCR rank
8/26 (2010)
JCR quartile
2 (2010)
ISSN
1098-7339
DOI
10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181e8a344
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
1165005
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-1165005
date created
2011-02-22 16:08:18
date last changed
2016-12-19 15:46:40
@article{1165005,
  abstract     = {Background and Objectives: The goal of this study was to investigate, with magnetic resonance imaging, the human anatomic positions of the spinal canal (eg, spinal cord, thecal tissue) in various postures and identify possible implications from different patient positioning for neuraxial anesthetic practice.
Method: Nine volunteers underwent magnetic resonance imaging in supine, laterally recumbent, and sitting (head-down) positions. Axial and sagittal slices of the thoracic and lumbar spine were measured for the relative distances between anatomic structures, including dura mater and spinal cord.
Results: The posterior dura spinal cord (midline) distance is on average greater than the anterior dura spinal cord (midline) distance along the thoracic spinal column, irrespective of volunteer postures (P {\textlangle} 0.05). The separation of the dura mater and spinal cord is greatest posterior in the middle thoracic region compared with upper and lower thoracic levels for all postures of the volunteers (P {\textlangle} 0.05). By placing the patient in a head-down sitting posture (as commonly done in epidural and spinal anesthesia), the posterior separation of the dura mater and spinal cord is increased.
Conclusions: The spinal cord follows the straightest line through the imposed geometry of the spinal canal. Accordingly, there is relatively more posterior separation of the cord and surrounding thecal tissue at midthoracic levels in the apex of the thoracic kyphosis. Placing a patient in a position that accentuates the thoracic curvature of the spine (ie, sitting head-down) increases the posterior separation of the spinal cord and dural sheath at thoracic levels.},
  author       = {Lee, Ruben A and van Zundert, Andre AJ and Botha, Charl P and Lataster, LM Arno and Van Zundert, Adrien and van der Ham, Willem GJM and Wieringa, Peter A},
  issn         = {1098-7339},
  journal      = {REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE},
  keyword      = {DISEASE,POSITION},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {4},
  pages        = {364--369},
  title        = {The anatomy of the thoracic spinal canal in different postures: a magnetic resonance imaging investigation},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181e8a344},
  volume       = {35},
  year         = {2010},
}

Chicago
Lee, Ruben A, Andre AJ van Zundert, Charl P Botha, LM Arno Lataster, Adrien Van Zundert, Willem GJM van der Ham, and Peter A Wieringa. 2010. “The Anatomy of the Thoracic Spinal Canal in Different Postures: a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation.” Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 35 (4): 364–369.
APA
Lee, R. A., van Zundert, A. A., Botha, C. P., Lataster, L. A., Van Zundert, A., van der Ham, W. G., & Wieringa, P. A. (2010). The anatomy of the thoracic spinal canal in different postures: a magnetic resonance imaging investigation. REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 35(4), 364–369.
Vancouver
1.
Lee RA, van Zundert AA, Botha CP, Lataster LA, Van Zundert A, van der Ham WG, et al. The anatomy of the thoracic spinal canal in different postures: a magnetic resonance imaging investigation. REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE. 2010;35(4):364–9.
MLA
Lee, Ruben A, Andre AJ van Zundert, Charl P Botha, et al. “The Anatomy of the Thoracic Spinal Canal in Different Postures: a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation.” REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE 35.4 (2010): 364–369. Print.