Advanced search
1 file | 204.70 KB

Norms and screening utility of the Dutch version of the children's depression inventory in clinical and nonclinical youths

(2010) PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT. 22(4). p.866-877
Author
Organization
Abstract
This study aimed to (a) assess relationships between the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI) and DSM-oriented depression and anxiety scales of the Youth Self Report, (b) develop reliable norms for the CDI, and (c) determine CDI cutoff scores for selecting youngsters at risk for depression and anxiety. A total of 3,073 nonclinical and 511 clinically referred children and adolescents from The Netherlands and Belgium were included. Results showed that CDI scores were significantly related to DSM-oriented symptoms of both depression and anxiety. CDI scores correlated highly with depression symptoms and moderately with anxiety symptoms. Norms for the CDI were determined by means of multiple regression analysis and depended on sex, age, and country. CDI cutoff scores for selecting individuals at risk for depression and anxiety as measured by the DSM-oriented depression and anxiety scales of the Youth Self Report were determined by means of multiple regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic analysis. A CDI score of 16 was found to have the most optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity for depression, whereas a score of 21 provided the best sensitivity and specificity for anxiety in a subsample of children. We conclude that the CDI is an effective instrument for screening depression and to a lesser extent anxiety in primary and secondary care centers, before applying further assessment of high-risk individuals.
Keywords
ADOLESCENTS, RATING-SCALES, CHILDHOOD, ANXIETY, COMORBIDITY, PREVALENCE, RECURRENCE, DISORDER, SEX, AGE, Children's Depression Inventory, cutoff, norming

Downloads

  • JRoelofs revised CB.pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 204.70 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Chicago
Roelofs, Jeffrey, Caroline Braet, Lea Rood, Benedikte Timbremont, Leen Van Vlierberghe, Lien Goossens, and Gerard van Breukelen. 2010. “Norms and Screening Utility of the Dutch Version of the Children’s Depression Inventory in Clinical and Nonclinical Youths.” Psychological Assessment 22 (4): 866–877.
APA
Roelofs, J., Braet, C., Rood, L., Timbremont, B., Van Vlierberghe, L., Goossens, L., & van Breukelen, G. (2010). Norms and screening utility of the Dutch version of the children’s depression inventory in clinical and nonclinical youths. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 22(4), 866–877.
Vancouver
1.
Roelofs J, Braet C, Rood L, Timbremont B, Van Vlierberghe L, Goossens L, et al. Norms and screening utility of the Dutch version of the children’s depression inventory in clinical and nonclinical youths. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT. 2010;22(4):866–77.
MLA
Roelofs, Jeffrey et al. “Norms and Screening Utility of the Dutch Version of the Children’s Depression Inventory in Clinical and Nonclinical Youths.” PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT 22.4 (2010): 866–877. Print.
@article{1151981,
  abstract     = {This study aimed to (a) assess relationships between the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI) and DSM-oriented depression and anxiety scales of the Youth Self Report, (b) develop reliable norms for the CDI, and (c) determine CDI cutoff scores for selecting youngsters at risk for depression and anxiety. A total of 3,073 nonclinical and 511 clinically referred children and adolescents from The Netherlands and Belgium were included. Results showed that CDI scores were significantly related to DSM-oriented symptoms of both depression and anxiety. CDI scores correlated highly with depression symptoms and moderately with anxiety symptoms. Norms for the CDI were determined by means of multiple regression analysis and depended on sex, age, and country. CDI cutoff scores for selecting individuals at risk for depression and anxiety as measured by the DSM-oriented depression and anxiety scales of the Youth Self Report were determined by means of multiple regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic analysis. A CDI score of 16 was found to have the most optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity for depression, whereas a score of 21 provided the best sensitivity and specificity for anxiety in a subsample of children. We conclude that the CDI is an effective instrument for screening depression and to a lesser extent anxiety in primary and secondary care centers, before applying further assessment of high-risk individuals.},
  author       = {Roelofs, Jeffrey and Braet, Caroline and Rood, Lea and Timbremont, Benedikte and Van Vlierberghe, Leen and Goossens, Lien and van Breukelen, Gerard},
  issn         = {1040-3590},
  journal      = {PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT},
  keywords     = {ADOLESCENTS,RATING-SCALES,CHILDHOOD,ANXIETY,COMORBIDITY,PREVALENCE,RECURRENCE,DISORDER,SEX,AGE,Children's Depression Inventory,cutoff,norming},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {4},
  pages        = {866--877},
  title        = {Norms and screening utility of the Dutch version of the children's depression inventory in clinical and nonclinical youths},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020593},
  volume       = {22},
  year         = {2010},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: