Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Generalization versus contextualization in automatic evaluation

B Gawronski, RJ Rydell, B Vervliet and Jan De Houwer UGent (2010) JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL. 139(4). p.683-701
abstract
Research has shown that automatic evaluations can be highly robust and difficult to change highly malleable and easy to change and highly context dependent We tested a representational account of these disparate findings which specifies the conditions under which automatic evaluations reflect (a) initially acquired information (b) subsequently acquired counterattitudinal information or (c) a mixture of both The account postulates that attention to contextual cues during the encoding of evaluative information determines whether this information is stored in a context free representation or a contextualized representation To the extent that attention to context cues is low during the encoding, of initial information but is enhanced by exposure to expectancy violating counterattitudinal information initial experiences are stored in context free representations whereas counter attitudinal experiences are stored in contextualized representations Hence automatic evaluations tend to reflect the valence of counter attitudinal information only in the context in which this information was learned (occasion setting) and the valence of initial experiences in any other context (renewal effect) Four experiments confirmed these predictions additionally showing, that (a) the Impact of initial experiences was reduced for automatic evaluations in novel contexts when context salience during the encoding of initial information was enhanced (b) context effects were eliminated altogether when context salience during the encoding of counterattitudinal information was reduced and (c) enhanced context silence during the encoding of counterattitudinal information produced context dependent automatic evaluations even when there was no contingency between valence and contextual cues Implications for automatic evaluation learning theory and interventions in applied settings are discussed
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
AFFECTIVE SIMON TASK, MULTIPLE CONTEXTS, IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TEST, ATTITUDE-CHANGE, EXPLICIT ATTITUDES, RACIAL PREJUDICE, MODEL, EXTINCTION, FEAR, MODULATION
journal title
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL
J. Exp. Psychol.-Gen.
volume
139
issue
4
pages
683 - 701
Web of Science type
Article
Web of Science id
000284442500008
JCR category
PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
JCR impact factor
5.042 (2010)
JCR rank
4/79 (2010)
JCR quartile
1 (2010)
ISSN
0096-3445
DOI
10.1037/a0020315
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
1106965
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-1106965
date created
2011-01-21 11:51:36
date last changed
2016-12-19 15:45:03
@article{1106965,
  abstract     = {Research has shown that automatic evaluations can be highly robust and difficult to change highly malleable and easy to change and highly context dependent We tested a representational account of these disparate findings which specifies the conditions under which automatic evaluations reflect (a) initially acquired information (b) subsequently acquired counterattitudinal information or (c) a mixture of both The account postulates that attention to contextual cues during the encoding of evaluative information determines whether this information is stored in a context free representation or a contextualized representation To the extent that attention to context cues is low during the encoding, of initial information but is enhanced by exposure to expectancy violating counterattitudinal information initial experiences are stored in context free representations whereas counter attitudinal experiences are stored in contextualized representations Hence automatic evaluations tend to reflect the valence of counter attitudinal information only in the context in which this information was learned (occasion setting) and the valence of initial experiences in any other context (renewal effect) Four experiments confirmed these predictions additionally showing, that (a) the Impact of initial experiences was reduced for automatic evaluations in novel contexts when context salience during the encoding of initial information was enhanced (b) context effects were eliminated altogether when context salience during the encoding of counterattitudinal information was reduced and (c) enhanced context silence during the encoding of counterattitudinal information produced context dependent automatic evaluations even when there was no contingency between valence and contextual cues Implications for automatic evaluation learning theory and interventions in applied settings are discussed},
  author       = {Gawronski, B and Rydell, RJ and Vervliet, B and De Houwer, Jan},
  issn         = {0096-3445},
  journal      = {JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL},
  keyword      = {AFFECTIVE SIMON TASK,MULTIPLE CONTEXTS,IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TEST,ATTITUDE-CHANGE,EXPLICIT ATTITUDES,RACIAL PREJUDICE,MODEL,EXTINCTION,FEAR,MODULATION},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {4},
  pages        = {683--701},
  title        = {Generalization versus contextualization in automatic evaluation},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020315},
  volume       = {139},
  year         = {2010},
}

Chicago
Gawronski, B, RJ Rydell, B Vervliet, and Jan De Houwer. 2010. “Generalization Versus Contextualization in Automatic Evaluation.” Journal of Experimental Psychology-general 139 (4): 683–701.
APA
Gawronski, B, Rydell, R., Vervliet, B., & De Houwer, J. (2010). Generalization versus contextualization in automatic evaluation. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 139(4), 683–701.
Vancouver
1.
Gawronski B, Rydell R, Vervliet B, De Houwer J. Generalization versus contextualization in automatic evaluation. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL. 2010;139(4):683–701.
MLA
Gawronski, B, RJ Rydell, B Vervliet, et al. “Generalization Versus Contextualization in Automatic Evaluation.” JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL 139.4 (2010): 683–701. Print.