Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue–task transition congruency

Björn Van Loy UGent, Baptist Liefooghe UGent and André Vandierendonck UGent (2010) QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY. 63(10). p.1916-1935
abstract
We investigated the processes underlying performance during cued task switching with transition cues. To this end, transition cueing and explicit cueing were compared in a design controlling for sequential effects in the two preceding trials in order to further examine the contribution of cue processes, task processes, and cue–task transition congruency during transition cueing. The study confirmed that the task-switch cost in transition cueing is larger than the task-switch cost in explicit cueing and showed that this larger switch cost is mainly due to cue processing. We also successfully decomposed performance in transition cueing into cue processing, task processing, and cue–task transition congruency on both a theoretical (Experiment 1) and an empirical basis (Experiments 2–3). Our empirical dissociation also demonstrates that cue–task transition congruency affects performance during both cue processing and task processing. We discuss the importance of our findings in relation to the different theories on task switching.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
PERFORMANCE, INHIBITION, REPRESENTATION, COSTS, STIMULUS, FEATURE BINDING, CLEVER HOMUNCULUS, SET RECONFIGURATION, PERCEPTION, RETRIEVAL, Cued task switching, Transition cueing, Explicit task cueing, Cue interpretation, Task reconfiguration, Cue-task transition congruency
journal title
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
Q. J. Exp. Psychol.
volume
63
issue
10
pages
1916 - 1935
Web of Science type
Article
Web of Science id
000282582500003
JCR category
PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
JCR impact factor
2.212 (2010)
JCR rank
27/79 (2010)
JCR quartile
2 (2010)
ISSN
1747-0218
DOI
10.1080/17470211003779160
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
1096737
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-1096737
date created
2011-01-10 18:25:11
date last changed
2015-06-17 09:21:19
@article{1096737,
  abstract     = {We investigated the processes underlying performance during cued task switching with transition cues. To this end, transition cueing and explicit cueing were compared in a design controlling for sequential effects in the two preceding trials in order to further examine the contribution of cue processes, task processes, and cue--task transition congruency during transition cueing. The study confirmed that the task-switch cost in transition cueing is larger than the task-switch cost in explicit cueing and showed that this larger switch cost is mainly due to cue processing. We also successfully decomposed performance in transition cueing into cue processing, task processing, and cue--task transition congruency on both a theoretical (Experiment 1) and an empirical basis (Experiments 2--3). Our empirical dissociation also demonstrates that cue--task transition congruency affects performance during both cue processing and task processing. We discuss the importance of our findings in relation to the different theories on task switching.},
  author       = {Van Loy, Bj{\"o}rn and Liefooghe, Baptist and Vandierendonck, Andr{\'e}},
  issn         = {1747-0218},
  journal      = {QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY},
  keyword      = {PERFORMANCE,INHIBITION,REPRESENTATION,COSTS,STIMULUS,FEATURE BINDING,CLEVER HOMUNCULUS,SET RECONFIGURATION,PERCEPTION,RETRIEVAL,Cued task switching,Transition cueing,Explicit task cueing,Cue interpretation,Task reconfiguration,Cue-task transition congruency},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {10},
  pages        = {1916--1935},
  title        = {Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue--task transition congruency},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470211003779160},
  volume       = {63},
  year         = {2010},
}

Chicago
Van Loy, Björn, Baptist Liefooghe, and André Vandierendonck. 2010. “Cognitive Control in Cued Task Switching with Transition Cues: Cue Processing, Task Processing, and Cue–task Transition Congruency.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (10): 1916–1935.
APA
Van Loy, B., Liefooghe, B., & Vandierendonck, A. (2010). Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue–task transition congruency. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 63(10), 1916–1935.
Vancouver
1.
Van Loy B, Liefooghe B, Vandierendonck A. Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue–task transition congruency. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY. 2010;63(10):1916–35.
MLA
Van Loy, Björn, Baptist Liefooghe, and André Vandierendonck. “Cognitive Control in Cued Task Switching with Transition Cues: Cue Processing, Task Processing, and Cue–task Transition Congruency.” QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY 63.10 (2010): 1916–1935. Print.