Advanced search
1 file | 342.45 KB Add to list

Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue–task transition congruency

Author
Organization
Abstract
We investigated the processes underlying performance during cued task switching with transition cues. To this end, transition cueing and explicit cueing were compared in a design controlling for sequential effects in the two preceding trials in order to further examine the contribution of cue processes, task processes, and cue–task transition congruency during transition cueing. The study confirmed that the task-switch cost in transition cueing is larger than the task-switch cost in explicit cueing and showed that this larger switch cost is mainly due to cue processing. We also successfully decomposed performance in transition cueing into cue processing, task processing, and cue–task transition congruency on both a theoretical (Experiment 1) and an empirical basis (Experiments 2–3). Our empirical dissociation also demonstrates that cue–task transition congruency affects performance during both cue processing and task processing. We discuss the importance of our findings in relation to the different theories on task switching.
Keywords
PERFORMANCE, INHIBITION, REPRESENTATION, COSTS, STIMULUS, FEATURE BINDING, CLEVER HOMUNCULUS, SET RECONFIGURATION, PERCEPTION, RETRIEVAL, Cued task switching, Transition cueing, Explicit task cueing, Cue interpretation, Task reconfiguration, Cue-task transition congruency

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 342.45 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Van Loy, Björn, et al. “Cognitive Control in Cued Task Switching with Transition Cues: Cue Processing, Task Processing, and Cue–Task Transition Congruency.” QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 63, no. 10, 2010, pp. 1916–35, doi:10.1080/17470211003779160.
APA
Van Loy, B., Liefooghe, B., & Vandierendonck, A. (2010). Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue–task transition congruency. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 63(10), 1916–1935. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470211003779160
Chicago author-date
Van Loy, Björn, Baptist Liefooghe, and André Vandierendonck. 2010. “Cognitive Control in Cued Task Switching with Transition Cues: Cue Processing, Task Processing, and Cue–Task Transition Congruency.” QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY 63 (10): 1916–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470211003779160.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Van Loy, Björn, Baptist Liefooghe, and André Vandierendonck. 2010. “Cognitive Control in Cued Task Switching with Transition Cues: Cue Processing, Task Processing, and Cue–Task Transition Congruency.” QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY 63 (10): 1916–1935. doi:10.1080/17470211003779160.
Vancouver
1.
Van Loy B, Liefooghe B, Vandierendonck A. Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue–task transition congruency. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY. 2010;63(10):1916–35.
IEEE
[1]
B. Van Loy, B. Liefooghe, and A. Vandierendonck, “Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue–task transition congruency,” QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 1916–1935, 2010.
@article{1096737,
  abstract     = {{We investigated the processes underlying performance during cued task switching with transition cues. To this end, transition cueing and explicit cueing were compared in a design controlling for sequential effects in the two preceding trials in order to further examine the contribution of cue processes, task processes, and cue–task transition congruency during transition cueing. The study confirmed that the task-switch cost in transition cueing is larger than the task-switch cost in explicit cueing and showed that this larger switch cost is mainly due to cue processing. We also successfully decomposed performance in transition cueing into cue processing, task processing, and cue–task transition congruency on both a theoretical (Experiment 1) and an empirical basis (Experiments 2–3). Our empirical dissociation also demonstrates that cue–task transition congruency affects performance during both cue processing and task processing. We discuss the importance of our findings in relation to the different theories on task switching.}},
  author       = {{Van Loy, Björn and Liefooghe, Baptist and Vandierendonck, André}},
  issn         = {{1747-0218}},
  journal      = {{QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY}},
  keywords     = {{PERFORMANCE,INHIBITION,REPRESENTATION,COSTS,STIMULUS,FEATURE BINDING,CLEVER HOMUNCULUS,SET RECONFIGURATION,PERCEPTION,RETRIEVAL,Cued task switching,Transition cueing,Explicit task cueing,Cue interpretation,Task reconfiguration,Cue-task transition congruency}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{10}},
  pages        = {{1916--1935}},
  title        = {{Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue–task transition congruency}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1080/17470211003779160}},
  volume       = {{63}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: