Advanced search
1 file | 240.07 KB

Expertise doordacht: reflectie via klimaatanalyse

(2010) ETHIEK & MAATSCHAPPIJ. 13(2). p.72-82
Author
Organization
Project
G.0122.10
Abstract
This paper analyses four theoretical problems concerning the notion of expertise and tries to formulate answers by scrutinizing these problems in light of scientific practice. The focus will be on the problems arising from the interference of experts in democratic decision making. I formulate my answers by referring to the Review-process of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Analysing how expertise influences this particular scientific practice is an example of how social-epistemological research is done and has to be done.
Keywords
Expertise, Responsibilities, Social Epistemology, Expert vs. Layman, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Climate Science, Technocracy

Downloads

  • artikel ethiek en maatschappij - Expertise doordacht reflectie via klimaatanalyse.pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 240.07 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Chicago
Kosolosky, Laszlo. 2010. “Expertise Doordacht: Reflectie via Klimaatanalyse.” Ethiek & Maatschappij 13 (2): 72–82.
APA
Kosolosky, L. (2010). Expertise doordacht: reflectie via klimaatanalyse. ETHIEK & MAATSCHAPPIJ, 13(2), 72–82.
Vancouver
1.
Kosolosky L. Expertise doordacht: reflectie via klimaatanalyse. ETHIEK & MAATSCHAPPIJ. 2010;13(2):72–82.
MLA
Kosolosky, Laszlo. “Expertise Doordacht: Reflectie via Klimaatanalyse.” ETHIEK & MAATSCHAPPIJ 13.2 (2010): 72–82. Print.
@article{1096409,
  abstract     = {This paper analyses four theoretical problems concerning the notion of expertise and tries to formulate answers by scrutinizing these problems in light of scientific practice. The focus will be on the problems arising from the interference of experts in democratic decision making. I formulate my answers by referring to the Review-process of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Analysing how expertise influences this particular scientific practice is an example of how social-epistemological research is done and has to be done.},
  author       = {Kosolosky, Laszlo},
  issn         = {1373-0975},
  journal      = {ETHIEK & MAATSCHAPPIJ},
  keywords     = {Expertise,Responsibilities,Social Epistemology,Expert vs. Layman,Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC),Climate Science,Technocracy},
  language     = {dut},
  number       = {2},
  pages        = {72--82},
  title        = {Expertise doordacht: reflectie via klimaatanalyse},
  volume       = {13},
  year         = {2010},
}