Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Complementariteit in kennistheoretisch perspectief

Brenda [Peggy] Casteleyn (2002)
abstract
Reality may be described in terms of external relations (entities have pre-existing properties) and in terms of internal relations (the properties are a consequence of the relation). These two ways of description are complementary. They are found in the work of different authors (Bohr, Whitehead, systems theory, Bohm, Löfgren, Prigogine). Bohr explicitly formulates a theory of complementarity, combining the two ways of description. How do other authors combine their two views of reality, is the concept of complementarity here also suitable as unifying concept? What are the implications of this complementary view on reality for the object-subject relation in epistemology? In contrast to the traditional view, where object and subject are postulated in terms of an external relation, I propose a 'complementary object-subject-relation'.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
promoter
UGent
organization
year
type
dissertation
publication status
published
subject
pages
218 pages
publisher
Universiteit Gent. Faculteit Letteren en Wijsbegeerte
place of publication
Gent
language
Dutch
UGent publication?
yes
classification
D1
copyright statement
I have retained and own the full copyright for this publication
id
1092346
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-1092346
date created
2010-12-23 14:14:23
date last changed
2017-01-02 09:54:53
@phdthesis{1092346,
  abstract     = {Reality may be described in terms of external relations (entities have pre-existing properties) and in terms of internal relations (the properties are a consequence of the relation). These two ways of description are complementary. They are found in the work of different authors (Bohr, Whitehead, systems theory, Bohm, L{\"o}fgren, Prigogine). Bohr explicitly formulates a theory of complementarity, combining the two ways of description. How do other authors combine their two views of reality, is the concept of complementarity here also suitable as unifying concept? What are the implications of this complementary view on reality for the object-subject relation in epistemology? In contrast to the traditional view, where object and subject are postulated in terms of an external relation, I propose a 'complementary object-subject-relation'.},
  author       = {Casteleyn, Brenda [Peggy]},
  language     = {dut},
  pages        = {218},
  publisher    = {Universiteit Gent. Faculteit Letteren en Wijsbegeerte},
  school       = {Ghent University},
  title        = {Complementariteit in kennistheoretisch perspectief},
  year         = {2002},
}

Chicago
Casteleyn, Brenda [Peggy]. 2002. “Complementariteit in Kennistheoretisch Perspectief”. Gent: Universiteit Gent. Faculteit Letteren en Wijsbegeerte.
APA
Casteleyn, B. [Peggy]. (2002). Complementariteit in kennistheoretisch perspectief. Universiteit Gent. Faculteit Letteren en Wijsbegeerte, Gent.
Vancouver
1.
Casteleyn B [Peggy]. Complementariteit in kennistheoretisch perspectief. [Gent]: Universiteit Gent. Faculteit Letteren en Wijsbegeerte; 2002.
MLA
Casteleyn, Brenda [Peggy]. “Complementariteit in Kennistheoretisch Perspectief.” 2002 : n. pag. Print.