Advanced search
1 file | 269.68 KB

Toward an integrative approach of cognitive neuroscientific and evolutionary psychological studies of art

(2010) EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY. 8(4). p.695-719
Author
Organization
Abstract
This paper examines explanations for human artistic behavior in two reductionist research programs, cognitive neuroscience and evolutionary psychology. Despite their different methodological outlooks, both approaches converge on an explanation of art production and appreciation as byproducts of normal perceptual and motivational cognitive skills that evolved in response to problems originally not related to art, such as the discrimination of salient visual stimuli and speech sounds. The explanatory power of this reductionist framework does not obviate the need for higher-level accounts of art from the humanities, such as aesthetics, art history or anthropology of art.
Keywords
MUSIC, TEDDY BEAR, HUMAN BRAIN, FRONTOTEMPORAL DEMENTIA, art, evolutionary psychology, cognitive neuroscience, STATES, STIMULI, RESPONSES, PAINTINGS, PREFERENCE, ORGANIZATION

Downloads

  • DeSmedt DeCruz EvolPsy.pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 269.68 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Chicago
De Smedt, Johan, and Helen De Cruz. 2010. “Toward an Integrative Approach of Cognitive Neuroscientific and Evolutionary Psychological Studies of Art.” Evolutionary Psychology 8 (4): 695–719.
APA
De Smedt, Johan, & De Cruz, H. (2010). Toward an integrative approach of cognitive neuroscientific and evolutionary psychological studies of art. EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY, 8(4), 695–719.
Vancouver
1.
De Smedt J, De Cruz H. Toward an integrative approach of cognitive neuroscientific and evolutionary psychological studies of art. EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY. 2010;8(4):695–719.
MLA
De Smedt, Johan, and Helen De Cruz. “Toward an Integrative Approach of Cognitive Neuroscientific and Evolutionary Psychological Studies of Art.” EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY 8.4 (2010): 695–719. Print.
@article{1082817,
  abstract     = {This paper examines explanations for human artistic behavior in two reductionist research programs, cognitive neuroscience and evolutionary psychology. Despite their  different methodological outlooks, both approaches converge on an explanation of art production and appreciation as byproducts of normal perceptual and motivational cognitive skills that evolved in response to problems originally not related to art, such as the discrimination of salient visual stimuli and speech sounds. The explanatory power of this  reductionist framework does not obviate the need for higher-level accounts of art from the humanities, such as aesthetics, art history or anthropology of art.},
  author       = {De Smedt, Johan and De Cruz, Helen},
  issn         = {1474-7049},
  journal      = {EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY},
  keyword      = {MUSIC,TEDDY BEAR,HUMAN BRAIN,FRONTOTEMPORAL DEMENTIA,art,evolutionary psychology,cognitive neuroscience,STATES,STIMULI,RESPONSES,PAINTINGS,PREFERENCE,ORGANIZATION},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {4},
  pages        = {695--719},
  title        = {Toward an integrative approach of cognitive neuroscientific and evolutionary psychological studies of art},
  volume       = {8},
  year         = {2010},
}

Web of Science
Times cited: