Advanced search

Confusion on the Concept of 'Rights'.

Mark Van Hoecke (UGent)
Author
Organization
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to criticize the 'animal rights' concept and to distinguish between animal rights as 'moral rights' and animal rights as (claimed) 'legal rights'.
Keywords
animal rights fallacies, legal rights, moral rights

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Chicago
Van Hoecke, Mark. 1995. “Confusion on the Concept of ‘Rights’.” In Law, Justice and the State: Essays on Justice and Rights, ed. A. Peczenik, 215–225. Stuttgart, Germany: Franz Steiner Verlag.
APA
Van Hoecke, Mark. (1995). Confusion on the Concept of “Rights”. In A. Peczenik (Ed.), Law, justice and the state: essays on justice and rights (pp. 215–225). Presented at the 16th World Congress of the International Association for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, Stuttgart, Germany: Franz Steiner Verlag.
Vancouver
1.
Van Hoecke M. Confusion on the Concept of “Rights”. In: Peczenik A, editor. Law, justice and the state: essays on justice and rights. Stuttgart, Germany: Franz Steiner Verlag; 1995. p. 215–25.
MLA
Van Hoecke, Mark. “Confusion on the Concept of ‘Rights’.” Law, Justice and the State: Essays on Justice and Rights. Ed. A. Peczenik. Stuttgart, Germany: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1995. 215–225. Print.
@inproceedings{1057005,
  abstract     = {The aim of this paper is to criticize the 'animal rights' concept and to distinguish between animal rights as 'moral rights' and animal rights as (claimed) 'legal rights'.},
  author       = {Van Hoecke, Mark},
  booktitle    = {Law, justice and the state: essays on justice and rights},
  editor       = {Peczenik, A.},
  isbn         = {3515066055},
  issn         = {0341-079X},
  keyword      = {animal rights fallacies,legal rights,moral rights},
  language     = {eng},
  location     = {Reykjavik},
  pages        = {215--225},
  publisher    = {Franz Steiner Verlag},
  title        = {Confusion on the Concept of 'Rights'.},
  year         = {1995},
}