Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Explaining the number of preferential votes for women in an open-list PR system: an investigation of the 2003 federal elections in Flanders (Belgium)

Bram Wauters UGent, Karolien Weekers and Bart Maddens (2010) ACTA POLITICA. 45(4). p.468-490
abstract
The electoral system is an important factor influencing female representation in Parliament. There is a consensus that a proportional representation (PR) system is more beneficial for women than a majoritarian system. Since there is a lot of variety in PR systems and since recent literature suggests that how actors cope with institutional provisions should be looked at more closely, we have investigated why women receive fewer votes in an open-list PR system. More in particular, it was our aim to find out whether women receive fewer votes because of voter bias or systemic bias. We have analyzed three variables influenced by systemic actors (parties, society and media) that have a substantial effect on the number of votes: media attention, campaign expenditures and list position. Our analysis of the 2003 federal Belgian elections shows that women are disadvantaged on these three variables and that as a consequence they obtain fewer votes. There is no voter bias, but a systemic bias. These disadvantages can be due either to individual characteristics influenced by education and society (less ambition, less convinced of capabilities, and so on) or, more importantly, to party-or media-related factors (a.o. list composition, designation of campaign budgets and spokespersons). Acta Politica (2010) 45, 468-490. doi:10.1057/ap.2010.6
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
MEDIA ATTENTION, CANDIDATE GENDER, CAMPAIGN, COVERAGE, QUOTAS, COMPETITION, INCUMBENTS, IMPACT, women, elections, political parties, media, Belgium, campaign expenses, POLITICAL-PARTIES, LEGISLATIVE ELECTIONS
journal title
ACTA POLITICA
Acta Polit.
volume
45
issue
4
pages
468 - 490
Web of Science type
Article
Web of Science id
000283992400004
JCR category
POLITICAL SCIENCE
JCR impact factor
0.706 (2010)
JCR rank
66/139 (2010)
JCR quartile
2 (2010)
ISSN
0001-6810
DOI
10.1057/ap.2010.6
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
1023745
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-1023745
date created
2010-08-16 12:28:26
date last changed
2016-12-19 15:45:57
@article{1023745,
  abstract     = {The electoral system is an important factor influencing female representation in Parliament. There is a consensus that a proportional representation (PR) system is more beneficial for women than a majoritarian system. Since there is a lot of variety in PR systems and since recent literature suggests that how actors cope with institutional provisions should be looked at more closely, we have investigated why women receive fewer votes in an open-list PR system. More in particular, it was our aim to find out whether women receive fewer votes because of voter bias or systemic bias. We have analyzed three variables influenced by systemic actors (parties, society and media) that have a substantial effect on the number of votes: media attention, campaign expenditures and list position. Our analysis of the 2003 federal Belgian elections shows that women are disadvantaged on these three variables and that as a consequence they obtain fewer votes. There is no voter bias, but a systemic bias. These disadvantages can be due either to individual characteristics influenced by education and society (less ambition, less convinced of capabilities, and so on) or, more importantly, to party-or media-related factors (a.o. list composition, designation of campaign budgets and spokespersons). Acta Politica (2010) 45, 468-490. doi:10.1057/ap.2010.6},
  author       = {Wauters, Bram and Weekers, Karolien and Maddens, Bart},
  issn         = {0001-6810},
  journal      = {ACTA POLITICA},
  keyword      = {MEDIA ATTENTION,CANDIDATE GENDER,CAMPAIGN,COVERAGE,QUOTAS,COMPETITION,INCUMBENTS,IMPACT,women,elections,political parties,media,Belgium,campaign expenses,POLITICAL-PARTIES,LEGISLATIVE ELECTIONS},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {4},
  pages        = {468--490},
  title        = {Explaining the number of preferential votes for women in an open-list PR system: an investigation of the 2003 federal elections in Flanders (Belgium)},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/ap.2010.6},
  volume       = {45},
  year         = {2010},
}

Chicago
Wauters, Bram, Karolien Weekers, and Bart Maddens. 2010. “Explaining the Number of Preferential Votes for Women in an Open-list PR System: An Investigation of the 2003 Federal Elections in Flanders (Belgium).” Acta Politica 45 (4): 468–490.
APA
Wauters, B., Weekers, K., & Maddens, B. (2010). Explaining the number of preferential votes for women in an open-list PR system: an investigation of the 2003 federal elections in Flanders (Belgium). ACTA POLITICA, 45(4), 468–490.
Vancouver
1.
Wauters B, Weekers K, Maddens B. Explaining the number of preferential votes for women in an open-list PR system: an investigation of the 2003 federal elections in Flanders (Belgium). ACTA POLITICA. 2010;45(4):468–90.
MLA
Wauters, Bram, Karolien Weekers, and Bart Maddens. “Explaining the Number of Preferential Votes for Women in an Open-list PR System: An Investigation of the 2003 Federal Elections in Flanders (Belgium).” ACTA POLITICA 45.4 (2010): 468–490. Print.