The ancient Greek periphrastic progressive : an extravagant construction?
- Author
- Klaas Bentein (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- Progressive constructions of the type ἦν διδάσκων are typically associated with Postclassical Greek, particularly the New Testament (Björck, 1940), but intriguingly, they also appear in the Classical period. The motivation for these constructions has long been debated. One important early contribution was Haiim Rosén’s (1957) proposal that εἰμί with the present participle functioned as a dedicated constituent-focus construction. While this proposal accounts for some examples, subsequent scholarship has shown that it does not explain the full range of uses. In earlier work on verbal periphrasis in Ancient Greek (Bentein 2016b), I therefore suggested a broader set of motivating factors, including morphological, syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic considerations. However, my analysis was largely diachronic, emphasizing grammaticalization paths and patterns of register spread. In this contribution, I revisit these issues through the lens of recent research by Peter Petré (2017) and Astrid de Wit et al. (2020), who connect the progressive construction in English and other languages to the speaker’s or writer’s desire to ‘stand out’— a phenomenon they term ‘extravagance’. I examine the extent to which progressive construal in Ancient Greek can be considered extravagant by (i) analyzing contextual cues associated with extravagance, such as speaker involvement, deictic and temporal adverbs, and markers of emphasis, and (ii) comparing semantically similar minimal pairs. In the second part of the chapter, I turn to New Testament periphrastics, which appear more integrated into narrative contexts than their Classical counterparts. Despite this integration, I argue that these constructions retain a highlighting function, though they now emphasize the event itself rather than other constituents (Johnson, 2010). I connect these findings to recent research on the relationship between aspect, progressivity in particular, and information structure, suggesting that the motivation for extravagance has evolved over time. Initially driven by novelty and aspectual coercion, the motivation for these constructions in later stages appears rooted in their inherent semantics.
- Keywords
- progressive, periphrasis, extravagance, classicalgreek, newtestament, informationstructure
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text (Accepted manuscript)
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 1.23 MB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-01KPXDQKYCXC66D3J0NTA0GVHK
- MLA
- Bentein, Klaas. “The Ancient Greek Periphrastic Progressive : An Extravagant Construction?” Linguistic Insights into the Meaning and Function of the Verb Εἰμί in Classical Greek Philosophy, edited by Ricardo Alcocer, Brill, 2026.
- APA
- Bentein, K. (2026). The ancient Greek periphrastic progressive : an extravagant construction? In R. Alcocer (Ed.), Linguistic insights into the meaning and function of the verb εἰμί in classical Greek philosophy. Leiden: Brill.
- Chicago author-date
- Bentein, Klaas. 2026. “The Ancient Greek Periphrastic Progressive : An Extravagant Construction?” In Linguistic Insights into the Meaning and Function of the Verb Εἰμί in Classical Greek Philosophy, edited by Ricardo Alcocer. Leiden: Brill.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Bentein, Klaas. 2026. “The Ancient Greek Periphrastic Progressive : An Extravagant Construction?” In Linguistic Insights into the Meaning and Function of the Verb Εἰμί in Classical Greek Philosophy, ed by. Ricardo Alcocer. Leiden: Brill.
- Vancouver
- 1.Bentein K. The ancient Greek periphrastic progressive : an extravagant construction? In: Alcocer R, editor. Linguistic insights into the meaning and function of the verb εἰμί in classical Greek philosophy. Leiden: Brill; 2026.
- IEEE
- [1]K. Bentein, “The ancient Greek periphrastic progressive : an extravagant construction?,” in Linguistic insights into the meaning and function of the verb εἰμί in classical Greek philosophy, R. Alcocer, Ed. Leiden: Brill, 2026.
@incollection{01KPXDQKYCXC66D3J0NTA0GVHK,
abstract = {{Progressive constructions of the type ἦν διδάσκων are typically associated with Postclassical Greek,
particularly the New Testament (Björck, 1940), but intriguingly, they also appear in the Classical period. The motivation for these constructions has long been debated. One important early contribution was Haiim Rosén’s (1957) proposal that εἰμί with the present participle functioned as a dedicated constituent-focus construction. While this proposal accounts for some examples, subsequent scholarship has shown that it does not explain the full range of uses. In earlier work on verbal periphrasis in Ancient Greek (Bentein 2016b), I therefore suggested a broader set of motivating factors, including morphological, syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic considerations. However, my analysis was largely diachronic,
emphasizing grammaticalization paths and patterns of register spread. In this contribution, I revisit these
issues through the lens of recent research by Peter Petré (2017) and Astrid de Wit et al. (2020), who connect
the progressive construction in English and other languages to the speaker’s or writer’s desire to ‘stand out’—
a phenomenon they term ‘extravagance’. I examine the extent to which progressive construal in Ancient
Greek can be considered extravagant by (i) analyzing contextual cues associated with extravagance, such as
speaker involvement, deictic and temporal adverbs, and markers of emphasis, and (ii) comparing
semantically similar minimal pairs. In the second part of the chapter, I turn to New Testament periphrastics,
which appear more integrated into narrative contexts than their Classical counterparts. Despite this
integration, I argue that these constructions retain a highlighting function, though they now emphasize the
event itself rather than other constituents (Johnson, 2010). I connect these findings to recent research on the
relationship between aspect, progressivity in particular, and information structure, suggesting that the
motivation for extravagance has evolved over time. Initially driven by novelty and aspectual coercion, the
motivation for these constructions in later stages appears rooted in their inherent semantics.}},
author = {{Bentein, Klaas}},
booktitle = {{Linguistic insights into the meaning and function of the verb εἰμί in classical Greek philosophy}},
editor = {{Alcocer, Ricardo}},
keywords = {{progressive,periphrasis,extravagance,classicalgreek,newtestament,informationstructure}},
language = {{eng}},
publisher = {{Brill}},
series = {{The language of classical literature}},
title = {{The ancient Greek periphrastic progressive : an extravagant construction?}},
year = {{2026}},
}