Academic Bibliography

 Search 200 years of publications by Ghent University researchers.
Advanced search
1 file | 10.01 MB
Add to list
  1. Search results
  2. Echosounders for fish detection distu...

Echosounders for fish detection disturb harbour porpoises

Jeroen Hubert, Benoit Berges, Clea Parcerisas Serrahima (UGent) , Elisabeth Debusschere, Joost A. C. de Bruijn, Jozefien M. Demuynck, Carlota Muniz and Hans Slabbekoorn
(2026) ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION. 391.
Author
Organization
Abstract
The marine world is an acoustic world that has become noisier with the increasing diversity and intensity of human activities at sea. The harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) is one of the best-studied cetaceans regarding hearing and responses to human-made underwater sound. The species is most sensitive to high frequencies, yet most impact studies have focused on relatively low-frequency sources. As such, the effects of high-frequency sonar - including echosounders - remain largely unstudied, despite their widespread use on vessels for depth sounding, fish or object detection, and seabed mapping. We investigated the effects of scientific echosounder use on harbour porpoises in the southern part of the North Sea using 13 deployments of multi-sensor moorings equipped with an echosounder, acoustic cetacean logger, and a hydrophone. Moorings operated for an average of 57 days, with split-beam scientific echosounders active for an average of 51 days, transmitting for 10 min every hour (5 min at 70 kHz, followed by 5 min at either 185-255 kHz or again at 70 kHz). Porpoise acoustic presence was continuously monitored using C/F-PODs and additionally validated with hydrophone detections at four of the locations. Across all 13 sites, detections declined by 65-79 % during echosounder transmissions and returned to typical levels within similar to 30 min after the echosounder stopped pinging. Despite this relatively quick recovery, there was no indication of habituation, as responses did not diminish across observation periods over six weeks of hourly exposure. Spatial effects appeared local, as no deterrent effect was observed at 2.5 km from the source. These findings have important implications for studies that investigate both harbour porpoise and fish presence to understand predator-prey interactions. In addition, they raise concern about the potentially cumulative impact on sensitive cetaceans from the wide use of relatively high-frequency sonar in offshore practices.
Keywords
Harbour porpoise, Echosounder, Sonar, Noise pollution, Disturbance, Deterrence, OFFSHORE WIND FARM, PHOCOENA-PHOCOENA, BEHAVIORAL-RESPONSES, MARINE MAMMALS, SONAR, SEA, COMMUNICATION, EXPOSURE, NOISE, SOUND

Downloads

  • Download
    1-s2.0-S0269749125019438-main.pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 10.01 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Hubert, Jeroen, et al. “Echosounders for Fish Detection Disturb Harbour Porpoises.” ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, vol. 391, 2026, doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2025.127569.
APA
Hubert, J., Berges, B., Parcerisas Serrahima, C., Debusschere, E., de Bruijn, J. A. C., Demuynck, J. M., … Slabbekoorn, H. (2026). Echosounders for fish detection disturb harbour porpoises. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2025.127569
Chicago author-date
Hubert, Jeroen, Benoit Berges, Clea Parcerisas Serrahima, Elisabeth Debusschere, Joost A. C. de Bruijn, Jozefien M. Demuynck, Carlota Muniz, and Hans Slabbekoorn. 2026. “Echosounders for Fish Detection Disturb Harbour Porpoises.” ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION 391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2025.127569.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Hubert, Jeroen, Benoit Berges, Clea Parcerisas Serrahima, Elisabeth Debusschere, Joost A. C. de Bruijn, Jozefien M. Demuynck, Carlota Muniz, and Hans Slabbekoorn. 2026. “Echosounders for Fish Detection Disturb Harbour Porpoises.” ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION 391. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2025.127569.
Vancouver
1.
Hubert J, Berges B, Parcerisas Serrahima C, Debusschere E, de Bruijn JAC, Demuynck JM, et al. Echosounders for fish detection disturb harbour porpoises. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION. 2026;391.
IEEE
[1]
J. Hubert et al., “Echosounders for fish detection disturb harbour porpoises,” ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, vol. 391, 2026.
@article{01KJQ899B1YG7ARPDBJAZW6BCG,
  abstract     = {{The marine world is an acoustic world that has become noisier with the increasing diversity and intensity of human activities at sea. The harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) is one of the best-studied cetaceans regarding hearing and responses to human-made underwater sound. The species is most sensitive to high frequencies, yet most impact studies have focused on relatively low-frequency sources. As such, the effects of high-frequency sonar - including echosounders - remain largely unstudied, despite their widespread use on vessels for depth sounding, fish or object detection, and seabed mapping. We investigated the effects of scientific echosounder use on harbour porpoises in the southern part of the North Sea using 13 deployments of multi-sensor moorings equipped with an echosounder, acoustic cetacean logger, and a hydrophone. Moorings operated for an average of 57 days, with split-beam scientific echosounders active for an average of 51 days, transmitting for 10 min every hour (5 min at 70 kHz, followed by 5 min at either 185-255 kHz or again at 70 kHz). Porpoise acoustic presence was continuously monitored using C/F-PODs and additionally validated with hydrophone detections at four of the locations. Across all 13 sites, detections declined by 65-79 % during echosounder transmissions and returned to typical levels within similar to 30 min after the echosounder stopped pinging. Despite this relatively quick recovery, there was no indication of habituation, as responses did not diminish across observation periods over six weeks of hourly exposure. Spatial effects appeared local, as no deterrent effect was observed at 2.5 km from the source. These findings have important implications for studies that investigate both harbour porpoise and fish presence to understand predator-prey interactions. In addition, they raise concern about the potentially cumulative impact on sensitive cetaceans from the wide use of relatively high-frequency sonar in offshore practices.}},
  articleno    = {{127569}},
  author       = {{Hubert, Jeroen and Berges, Benoit and Parcerisas Serrahima, Clea and Debusschere, Elisabeth and de Bruijn, Joost A. C. and Demuynck, Jozefien M. and Muniz, Carlota and Slabbekoorn, Hans}},
  issn         = {{0269-7491}},
  journal      = {{ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION}},
  keywords     = {{Harbour porpoise,Echosounder,Sonar,Noise pollution,Disturbance,Deterrence,OFFSHORE WIND FARM,PHOCOENA-PHOCOENA,BEHAVIORAL-RESPONSES,MARINE MAMMALS,SONAR,SEA,COMMUNICATION,EXPOSURE,NOISE,SOUND}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{16}},
  title        = {{Echosounders for fish detection disturb harbour porpoises}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2025.127569}},
  volume       = {{391}},
  year         = {{2026}},
}
Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: