Horizontal links in the constructional network and their role in constructional contamination : connections between Dutch krijgen-constructions
(2026)
- Author
- Gauthier Delaby (UGent)
- Promoter
- Timothy Colleman (UGent)
- Organization
- Project
- Abstract
- In this dissertation, we investigated the intricacies of the phenomenon of constructional contamination, which is the effect whereby one grammatical construction influences a subset of instances of another construction in its realization due to (coincidental) formal similarity between both constructions. This was done through an extensive empirical study of two cases of grammatical alternation in Dutch: (i) the alternation between the [Aux+Part] and [Part+Aux] word order in receptive and resultative verb clusters with krijgen ‘to get’ and (ii) the variation between the prepositions van ‘from/by’ and door ‘through/by’ in the prepositional phrase encoding the agent of the receptive construction. We studied potential contamination effects in these alternations in two national varieties of Dutch, viz. Belgian Dutch and Netherlandic Dutch, and with a range of methodological approaches, viz. corpus studies, an acceptability survey, sentence embeddings generated by a large language model and a psycholinguistic priming experiment. (i) The mechanism underlying contamination. In earlier work on contamination, the phenomenon was explained as the consequence of language users storing unanalyzed strings of a contaminating construction as exemplar chunks, which they later recycle in a target construction. Construction grammar assumes that formally similar constructions are connected in the minds of language users, so the question rises if these so-called “horizontal links” contribute to contamination, as a complementary mechanism to chunking-related processes. We indeed found several indications for this. For example, contamination also occurs in cases where constructions do not exhibit exact string similarity, but are only similar at a more schematic level. In another case, a reverse contamination effect was found, meaning that the alternant for which chunks are supposedly stored is actually avoided in the target construction. (ii) Lectal variation in contamination. We have shown that contamination effects can differ between national varieties. More specifically, it was found that contamination occurs with a more restricted set of verbs in Netherlandic Dutch compared to Belgian Dutch, and that in the latter variety, contamination occurs more easily based on abstract similarity. We explained this as a consequence of weaker horizontal links between certain constructions in Netherlandic Dutch, and, tentatively, as a consequence of the relatively more exemplar-based nature of Netherlandic Dutch, which might result in stronger horizontal links at lower levels (i.e. less abstract) in the constructional taxonomy. (iii) Bidirectionality of contamination. We confirmed the hypothesis that contamination is bidirectional in nature. However, we have also shown that it is not necessarily symmetric: contamination effects can, in some pairs of constructions, occur more easily in one direction than the other. (iv) Contamination affects acceptability judgments. We have shown that the effects of constructional contamination extend beyond language production: if language users evaluate the acceptability of instances of a construction, they might be influenced by the connections that construction has with formally similar constructions in their minds. (v) Contamination shapes grammar. We have demonstrated that contamination is very likely blocking the [Aux+Part]-order in resultative clusters. This indicates that, in some cases, connections between constructions can better explain tendencies in grammar than postulated grammatical properties of constructions.
- In dit proefschrift hebben we de werking van het verschijnsel constructionele contaminatie nader onderzocht, i.e. het effect waarbij een grammaticale constructie een subset van instantiaties van een andere constructie beïnvloedt in hun realisatie door een (toevallige) formele gelijkenis tussen beide constructies. Dit gebeurde via een uitgebreide empirische studie van twee grammaticale alternanties in het Nederlands: (i) de alternantie tussen de [Aux+Part] en [Part+Aux] woordvolgordes in receptieve en resultatieve werkwoordsclusters met krijgen en (ii) de variatie tussen de voorzetsels van en door in de voorzetselconstituent die het agens van de receptieve constructie uitdrukt. We onderzochten potentiële contaminatie-effecten bij deze alternanties in twee nationale variëteiten van het Nederlands, namelijk Belgisch-Nederlands en Nederlands-Nederlands, en met behulp van een aantal verschillende methoden, namelijk corpusonderzoek, een acceptabiliteitsstudie, sentence embeddings gegenereerd door een large language model en een psycholinguïstisch primingexperiment. (i) Het mechanisme achter contaminatie. In eerder onderzoek naar contaminatie werd het fenomeen verklaard als het gevolg van taalgebruikers die ongeparsete strings van een contaminerende constructie opslaan als “exemplar chunks” en die die chunks later recycleren in een targetconstructie. De constructiegrammatica veronderstelt dat formeel gelijke constructies geconnecteerd zijn in het hoofd van taalgebruikers. Bijgevolg stelt zich de vraag of die zogenaamde “horizontale links” bijdragen aan constructionele contaminatie, als een mechanisme complementair aan chunking-gerelateerde processen. We hebben inderdaad verschillende indicaties daarvoor gevonden. Zo vonden we ook contaminatie in constructieparen die geen exacte stringgelijkenis vertonen, maar die alleen gelijk zijn op een schematischer niveau. Voor een ander constructiepaar werd een omgekeerd contaminatie-effect gevonden, waarbij de alternant waarvoor er vermoedelijk chunks zijn opgeslagen net vermeden wordt in de targetconstructie. (ii) Lectale variatie in contaminatie. We hebben aangetoond dat contaminatie-effecten kunnen verschillen tussen nationale variëteiten. Meer bepaald bleek dat contaminatie in het Nederlands-Nederlands voorkomt bij een beperktere set van werkwoorden in vergelijking met het Belgisch-Nederlands, en dat in die laatste variëteit contaminatie makkelijker gebeurt tussen constructies die enkel op een abstract niveau gelijkenis vertonen. We hebben dit verklaard als het gevolg van minder sterke horizontale links tussen bepaalde constructieparen in het Nederlands-Nederlands, en, tentatief, als het gevolg van de relatief meer exemplar-gebaseerde aard van het Nederlands-Nederlands, waardoor de sterkste horizontale links zich mogelijk bevinden op lagere niveaus (i.e. minder abstract) in de constructionele taxonomie. (iii) Bidirectionaliteit van contaminatie. We hebben de hypothese dat contaminatie een bidirectioneel fenomeen is bevestigd. Tegelijk stelden we vast dat contaminatie-effecten niet per se symmetrisch zijn: contaminatie kan bij sommige constructieparen makkelijker in de ene dan in de andere richting optreden. (iv) Contaminatie beïnvloedt acceptabiliteitsoordelen. We hebben aangetoond dat de effecten van constructionele contaminatie niet alleen in taalproductie spelen: als taalgebruikers de acceptabiliteit van instantiaties van een constructie beoordelen, kunnen ze beïnvloed worden door de connecties die die constructie heeft met andere, vormgelijke constructies in hun hoofd. (v) Contaminatie beïnvloedt de grammatica. We hebben gedemonstreerd dat contaminatie hoogstwaarschijnlijk de [Aux+Part]-volgorde blokkeert in resultatieve werkwoordsclusters. Dit wijst erop dat in sommige gevallen bepaalde grammaticale fenomenen beter verklaard kunnen worden door de connecties tussen constructies dan door gepostuleerde grammaticale eigenschappen van constructies.
- Keywords
- construction grammar, horizontal links, Dutch, constructional network, constructional contamination, national variation, verb clusters, word order variation, ambiguity avoidance, blocking
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- UGent only (changes to open access on 2031-02-05)
- |
- |
- 4.10 MB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-01KGFTMMX64XHPFHJ56Z6K50YJ
- MLA
- Delaby, Gauthier. Horizontal Links in the Constructional Network and Their Role in Constructional Contamination : Connections between Dutch Krijgen-Constructions. Ghent University. Faculty of Arts and Philosophy, 2026.
- APA
- Delaby, G. (2026). Horizontal links in the constructional network and their role in constructional contamination : connections between Dutch krijgen-constructions. Ghent University. Faculty of Arts and Philosophy, Ghent, Belgium.
- Chicago author-date
- Delaby, Gauthier. 2026. “Horizontal Links in the Constructional Network and Their Role in Constructional Contamination : Connections between Dutch Krijgen-Constructions.” Ghent, Belgium: Ghent University. Faculty of Arts and Philosophy.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Delaby, Gauthier. 2026. “Horizontal Links in the Constructional Network and Their Role in Constructional Contamination : Connections between Dutch Krijgen-Constructions.” Ghent, Belgium: Ghent University. Faculty of Arts and Philosophy.
- Vancouver
- 1.Delaby G. Horizontal links in the constructional network and their role in constructional contamination : connections between Dutch krijgen-constructions. [Ghent, Belgium]: Ghent University. Faculty of Arts and Philosophy; 2026.
- IEEE
- [1]G. Delaby, “Horizontal links in the constructional network and their role in constructional contamination : connections between Dutch krijgen-constructions,” Ghent University. Faculty of Arts and Philosophy, Ghent, Belgium, 2026.
@phdthesis{01KGFTMMX64XHPFHJ56Z6K50YJ,
abstract = {{In this dissertation, we investigated the intricacies of the phenomenon of constructional contamination, which is the effect whereby one grammatical construction influences a subset of instances of another construction in its realization due to (coincidental) formal similarity between both constructions. This was done through an extensive empirical study of two cases of grammatical alternation in Dutch: (i) the alternation between the [Aux+Part] and [Part+Aux] word order in receptive and resultative verb clusters with krijgen ‘to get’ and (ii) the variation between the prepositions van ‘from/by’ and door ‘through/by’ in the prepositional phrase encoding the agent of the receptive construction. We studied potential contamination effects in these alternations in two national varieties of Dutch, viz. Belgian Dutch and Netherlandic Dutch, and with a range of methodological approaches, viz. corpus studies, an acceptability survey, sentence embeddings generated by a large language model and a psycholinguistic priming experiment.
(i) The mechanism underlying contamination. In earlier work on contamination, the phenomenon was explained as the consequence of language users storing unanalyzed strings of a contaminating construction as exemplar chunks, which they later recycle in a target construction. Construction grammar assumes that formally similar constructions are connected in the minds of language users, so the question rises if these so-called “horizontal links” contribute to contamination, as a complementary mechanism to chunking-related processes. We indeed found several indications for this. For example, contamination also occurs in cases where constructions do not exhibit exact string similarity, but are only similar at a more schematic level. In another case, a reverse contamination effect was found, meaning that the alternant for which chunks are supposedly stored is actually avoided in the target construction.
(ii) Lectal variation in contamination. We have shown that contamination effects can differ between national varieties. More specifically, it was found that contamination occurs with a more restricted set of verbs in Netherlandic Dutch compared to Belgian Dutch, and that in the latter variety, contamination occurs more easily based on abstract similarity. We explained this as a consequence of weaker horizontal links between certain constructions in Netherlandic Dutch, and, tentatively, as a consequence of the relatively more exemplar-based nature of Netherlandic Dutch, which might result in stronger horizontal links at lower levels (i.e. less abstract) in the constructional taxonomy.
(iii) Bidirectionality of contamination. We confirmed the hypothesis that contamination is bidirectional in nature. However, we have also shown that it is not necessarily symmetric: contamination effects can, in some pairs of constructions, occur more easily in one direction than the other.
(iv) Contamination affects acceptability judgments. We have shown that the effects of constructional contamination extend beyond language production: if language users evaluate the acceptability of instances of a construction, they might be influenced by the connections that construction has with formally similar constructions in their minds.
(v) Contamination shapes grammar. We have demonstrated that contamination is very likely blocking the [Aux+Part]-order in resultative clusters. This indicates that, in some cases, connections between constructions can better explain tendencies in grammar than postulated grammatical properties of constructions.}},
author = {{Delaby, Gauthier}},
keywords = {{construction grammar,horizontal links,Dutch,constructional network,constructional contamination,national variation,verb clusters,word order variation,ambiguity avoidance,blocking}},
language = {{eng}},
pages = {{355}},
publisher = {{Ghent University. Faculty of Arts and Philosophy}},
school = {{Ghent University}},
title = {{Horizontal links in the constructional network and their role in constructional contamination : connections between Dutch krijgen-constructions}},
year = {{2026}},
}