Goal clarification and process feedback matter : reducing test anxiety in low-stakes testing
- Author
- Stefanie De Jonge (UGent) , Evelien Opdecam (UGent) , Erika A. Patall and Leen Haerens (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- Test anxiety can undermine student achievement and self-esteem, even with low-stakes tests designed to support learning. While previous research mainly focused on individual factors, an important question was whether aspects of the social context - how teachers interact with students about tests - can also reduce test anxiety. Grounded in assessment for learning and self-determination theory, this study investigated if goal clarification and process feedback - core instructional strategies in low-stakes contexts - relate to lower test anxiety via need satisfaction and need frustration. A pretest-posttest field study was conducted with 237 secondary school students. Two to five days before their low-stakes test, a pre-questionnaire measured students' baseline test anxiety, need-based experiences, and perceptions of goal clarification and process feedback. The post-questionnaire, completed immediately after the test, assessed students' experienced test anxiety. Multilevel analyses revealed that students who perceived more goal clarification and process feedback reported lower test anxiety, after accounting for baseline test anxiety and gender. Greater need satisfaction, but not lower need frustration, mediated these student-level relations. Moreover, classroom-level process feedback predicted decreased test anxiety. These findings suggest that providing more clarity on learning goals and more process feedback can alleviate test anxiety in low-stakes contexts, offering insights for targeted interventions.
- Keywords
- Clarity, feedback, self-determination theory, test anxiety, low-stakes testing, COGNITIVE TEST ANXIETY, FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT, AUTONOMY SUPPORT, MOTIVATION, STUDENTS, ACHIEVEMENT, ENGAGEMENT, CLASSROOM, EDUCATION, TEACHERS
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 1.55 MB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-01K5ZXRPBHE2A9RE1944GF01SS
- MLA
- De Jonge, Stefanie, et al. “Goal Clarification and Process Feedback Matter : Reducing Test Anxiety in Low-Stakes Testing.” JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, 2025, doi:10.1080/00220973.2025.2549870.
- APA
- De Jonge, S., Opdecam, E., Patall, E. A., & Haerens, L. (2025). Goal clarification and process feedback matter : reducing test anxiety in low-stakes testing. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2025.2549870
- Chicago author-date
- De Jonge, Stefanie, Evelien Opdecam, Erika A. Patall, and Leen Haerens. 2025. “Goal Clarification and Process Feedback Matter : Reducing Test Anxiety in Low-Stakes Testing.” JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2025.2549870.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- De Jonge, Stefanie, Evelien Opdecam, Erika A. Patall, and Leen Haerens. 2025. “Goal Clarification and Process Feedback Matter : Reducing Test Anxiety in Low-Stakes Testing.” JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION. doi:10.1080/00220973.2025.2549870.
- Vancouver
- 1.De Jonge S, Opdecam E, Patall EA, Haerens L. Goal clarification and process feedback matter : reducing test anxiety in low-stakes testing. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION. 2025;
- IEEE
- [1]S. De Jonge, E. Opdecam, E. A. Patall, and L. Haerens, “Goal clarification and process feedback matter : reducing test anxiety in low-stakes testing,” JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, 2025.
@article{01K5ZXRPBHE2A9RE1944GF01SS,
abstract = {{Test anxiety can undermine student achievement and self-esteem, even with low-stakes tests designed to support learning. While previous research mainly focused on individual factors, an important question was whether aspects of the social context - how teachers interact with students about tests - can also reduce test anxiety. Grounded in assessment for learning and self-determination theory, this study investigated if goal clarification and process feedback - core instructional strategies in low-stakes contexts - relate to lower test anxiety via need satisfaction and need frustration. A pretest-posttest field study was conducted with 237 secondary school students. Two to five days before their low-stakes test, a pre-questionnaire measured students' baseline test anxiety, need-based experiences, and perceptions of goal clarification and process feedback. The post-questionnaire, completed immediately after the test, assessed students' experienced test anxiety. Multilevel analyses revealed that students who perceived more goal clarification and process feedback reported lower test anxiety, after accounting for baseline test anxiety and gender. Greater need satisfaction, but not lower need frustration, mediated these student-level relations. Moreover, classroom-level process feedback predicted decreased test anxiety. These findings suggest that providing more clarity on learning goals and more process feedback can alleviate test anxiety in low-stakes contexts, offering insights for targeted interventions.}},
author = {{De Jonge, Stefanie and Opdecam, Evelien and Patall, Erika A. and Haerens, Leen}},
issn = {{0022-0973}},
journal = {{JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION}},
keywords = {{Clarity,feedback,self-determination theory,test anxiety,low-stakes testing,COGNITIVE TEST ANXIETY,FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT,AUTONOMY SUPPORT,MOTIVATION,STUDENTS,ACHIEVEMENT,ENGAGEMENT,CLASSROOM,EDUCATION,TEACHERS}},
language = {{eng}},
pages = {{21}},
title = {{Goal clarification and process feedback matter : reducing test anxiety in low-stakes testing}},
url = {{http://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2025.2549870}},
year = {{2025}},
}
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: