Advanced search
1 file | 736.61 KB Add to list

Citizen preferences for decisional power levels and participatory instruments in local government

Ruben Van Severen (UGent) , Tessa Haesevoets (UGent) , Bram Wauters (UGent) and Arne Roets (UGent)
(2025) POLICY STUDIES. p.1-31
Author
Organization
Project
Abstract
Western democracies increasingly struggle with public dissatisfaction toward political institutions. In response, local governments have begun implementing participatory reforms. This study examines how citizens perceive such initiatives, based on a large and representative sample of Flemish citizens (N = 2,205). Participation was studied through two complementary lenses: (1) hypothetical decision-making scenarios that varied in the level of decisional power granted to citizens (traditional representative, consultative, co-decisive, and decisive), and (2) concrete participatory instruments commonly used at the local level (e.g. citizen panels, referenda) which also differ in procedural features. Findings reveal that citizens desire more involvement than elections alone provide, yet they are not eager to assume full control over policy decisions. Co-decision between citizens and government was perceived as most legitimate, outperforming both consultative models and scenarios where citizens had the final say. Among participatory instruments, citizen consultations were most preferred, and aggregative formats (consultations, referenda) were slightly favoured over deliberative ones (citizen panels, advisory councils). Individual differences in political orientation and political cynicism modestly influenced preferences, particularly at the extremes of decisional power and in the aggregation - deliberation divide. Together, our data reveal important nuances into citizens' preferred decisional power levels and participation types, offering valuable insights for scholars and policymakers.
Keywords
Citizen participation, power, instruments, preferences, individual differences, SOCIAL-DOMINANCE ORIENTATION, WING AUTHORITARIANISM, PUBLIC-OPINION, DELIBERATION, LEGITIMACY, DEMOCRACY, CRISIS, TRUST, MOBILIZATION, INNOVATIONS

Downloads

  • (...).docx
    • full text (Accepted manuscript)
    • |
    • UGent only (changes to open access on 2026-02-12)
    • |
    • Word
    • |
    • 736.61 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Van Severen, Ruben, et al. “Citizen Preferences for Decisional Power Levels and Participatory Instruments in Local Government.” POLICY STUDIES, 2025, pp. 1–31, doi:10.1080/01442872.2025.2539495.
APA
Van Severen, R., Haesevoets, T., Wauters, B., & Roets, A. (2025). Citizen preferences for decisional power levels and participatory instruments in local government. POLICY STUDIES, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2025.2539495
Chicago author-date
Van Severen, Ruben, Tessa Haesevoets, Bram Wauters, and Arne Roets. 2025. “Citizen Preferences for Decisional Power Levels and Participatory Instruments in Local Government.” POLICY STUDIES, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2025.2539495.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Van Severen, Ruben, Tessa Haesevoets, Bram Wauters, and Arne Roets. 2025. “Citizen Preferences for Decisional Power Levels and Participatory Instruments in Local Government.” POLICY STUDIES: 1–31. doi:10.1080/01442872.2025.2539495.
Vancouver
1.
Van Severen R, Haesevoets T, Wauters B, Roets A. Citizen preferences for decisional power levels and participatory instruments in local government. POLICY STUDIES. 2025;1–31.
IEEE
[1]
R. Van Severen, T. Haesevoets, B. Wauters, and A. Roets, “Citizen preferences for decisional power levels and participatory instruments in local government,” POLICY STUDIES, pp. 1–31, 2025.
@article{01K4QA69R329W2KQF4QCR1NY4H,
  abstract     = {{Western democracies increasingly struggle with public dissatisfaction toward political institutions. In response, local governments have begun implementing participatory reforms. This study examines how citizens perceive such initiatives, based on a large and representative sample of Flemish citizens (N = 2,205). Participation was studied through two complementary lenses: (1) hypothetical decision-making scenarios that varied in the level of decisional power granted to citizens (traditional representative, consultative, co-decisive, and decisive), and (2) concrete participatory instruments commonly used at the local level (e.g. citizen panels, referenda) which also differ in procedural features. Findings reveal that citizens desire more involvement than elections alone provide, yet they are not eager to assume full control over policy decisions. Co-decision between citizens and government was perceived as most legitimate, outperforming both consultative models and scenarios where citizens had the final say. Among participatory instruments, citizen consultations were most preferred, and aggregative formats (consultations, referenda) were slightly favoured over deliberative ones (citizen panels, advisory councils). Individual differences in political orientation and political cynicism modestly influenced preferences, particularly at the extremes of decisional power and in the aggregation - deliberation divide. Together, our data reveal important nuances into citizens' preferred decisional power levels and participation types, offering valuable insights for scholars and policymakers.}},
  author       = {{Van Severen, Ruben and Haesevoets, Tessa and Wauters, Bram and Roets, Arne}},
  issn         = {{0144-2872}},
  journal      = {{POLICY STUDIES}},
  keywords     = {{Citizen participation,power,instruments,preferences,individual differences,SOCIAL-DOMINANCE ORIENTATION,WING AUTHORITARIANISM,PUBLIC-OPINION,DELIBERATION,LEGITIMACY,DEMOCRACY,CRISIS,TRUST,MOBILIZATION,INNOVATIONS}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{1--31}},
  title        = {{Citizen preferences for decisional power levels and participatory instruments in local government}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2025.2539495}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: