Patient‐reported outcomes, influencing factors, nursing care/intervention(s) and measurement scales of psychiatric and/or mental health nursing in hospitals : a systematic review
- Author
- Karel Desmet (UGent) , Bruce Vrancken (UGent) , Jochen Bergs, Ann Van Hecke (UGent) , Eddy Deproost (UGent) , Piet Bracke (UGent) , Sofie Muylaert and Sofie Verhaeghe (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- Introduction The assessment of patient-reported outcomes of psychiatric and/or mental health nursing remains understudied, limiting understanding of what matters to patients. Aim To identify, appraise and synthesise available evidence on patient-reported outcomes, influencing factors, nursing care/interventions and measurement scales of mental health nursing in hospitals. Method Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, APA PsychARTICLES, Scopus and Web of Science were searched from conception to April 2024 (update March 2025). Two reviewers independently screened and selected the studies based on a predefined PICO framework in a two-stage process. Quality assessment was conducted using the Johanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines. Results Analysis of 22 studies identified 25 patient-reported outcomes, measured by 30 unique scales, clustered into three categories: ‘symptoms & complaints-based patient-reported outcomes’, ‘psycho-emotional patient-reported outcomes’, and ‘functional patient-reported outcomes’. Ten influencing factors emerged from two studies. Nursing care/interventions compromised four clusters: nurse-delivered group programme (n = 8), one-to-one nursing therapy or interaction (n = 8), group and individual nursing sessions (n = 1) and interpersonal relationship (n = 5). Conclusion Patient-reported outcomes serve as robust validators for advancing psychiatric and/or mental health nursing within hospital settings. Findings emphasise the importance of well-conceptualised nurse-sensitive patient outcomes using valid and reliable scales to recognise the full psychotherapeutic potential of mental health nursing.
- Keywords
- hospitals, patient outcome assessment, psychiatric nursing, systematic reviews, treatment outcome, PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES, TURKISH VERSION, VALIDATION, DEPRESSION, INVENTORY, RELIABILITY, RECOVERY, VALIDITY, CARE, SCHIZOPHRENIA
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 744.05 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-01JZWPVWQYHK87GCB64JA8GCYG
- MLA
- Desmet, Karel, et al. “Patient‐reported Outcomes, Influencing Factors, Nursing Care/Intervention(s) and Measurement Scales of Psychiatric and/or Mental Health Nursing in Hospitals : A Systematic Review.” JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC AND MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, vol. 32, no. 5, 2025, pp. 1159–83, doi:10.1111/jpm.70006.
- APA
- Desmet, K., Vrancken, B., Bergs, J., Van Hecke, A., Deproost, E., Bracke, P., … Verhaeghe, S. (2025). Patient‐reported outcomes, influencing factors, nursing care/intervention(s) and measurement scales of psychiatric and/or mental health nursing in hospitals : a systematic review. JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC AND MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 32(5), 1159–1183. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.70006
- Chicago author-date
- Desmet, Karel, Bruce Vrancken, Jochen Bergs, Ann Van Hecke, Eddy Deproost, Piet Bracke, Sofie Muylaert, and Sofie Verhaeghe. 2025. “Patient‐reported Outcomes, Influencing Factors, Nursing Care/Intervention(s) and Measurement Scales of Psychiatric and/or Mental Health Nursing in Hospitals : A Systematic Review.” JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC AND MENTAL HEALTH NURSING 32 (5): 1159–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.70006.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Desmet, Karel, Bruce Vrancken, Jochen Bergs, Ann Van Hecke, Eddy Deproost, Piet Bracke, Sofie Muylaert, and Sofie Verhaeghe. 2025. “Patient‐reported Outcomes, Influencing Factors, Nursing Care/Intervention(s) and Measurement Scales of Psychiatric and/or Mental Health Nursing in Hospitals : A Systematic Review.” JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC AND MENTAL HEALTH NURSING 32 (5): 1159–1183. doi:10.1111/jpm.70006.
- Vancouver
- 1.Desmet K, Vrancken B, Bergs J, Van Hecke A, Deproost E, Bracke P, et al. Patient‐reported outcomes, influencing factors, nursing care/intervention(s) and measurement scales of psychiatric and/or mental health nursing in hospitals : a systematic review. JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC AND MENTAL HEALTH NURSING. 2025;32(5):1159–83.
- IEEE
- [1]K. Desmet et al., “Patient‐reported outcomes, influencing factors, nursing care/intervention(s) and measurement scales of psychiatric and/or mental health nursing in hospitals : a systematic review,” JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC AND MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1159–1183, 2025.
@article{01JZWPVWQYHK87GCB64JA8GCYG,
abstract = {{Introduction
The assessment of patient-reported outcomes of psychiatric and/or mental health nursing remains understudied, limiting understanding of what matters to patients.
Aim
To identify, appraise and synthesise available evidence on patient-reported outcomes, influencing factors, nursing care/interventions and measurement scales of mental health nursing in hospitals.
Method
Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, APA PsychARTICLES, Scopus and Web of Science were searched from conception to April 2024 (update March 2025). Two reviewers independently screened and selected the studies based on a predefined PICO framework in a two-stage process. Quality assessment was conducted using the Johanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines.
Results
Analysis of 22 studies identified 25 patient-reported outcomes, measured by 30 unique scales, clustered into three categories: ‘symptoms & complaints-based patient-reported outcomes’, ‘psycho-emotional patient-reported outcomes’, and ‘functional patient-reported outcomes’. Ten influencing factors emerged from two studies. Nursing care/interventions compromised four clusters: nurse-delivered group programme (n = 8), one-to-one nursing therapy or interaction (n = 8), group and individual nursing sessions (n = 1) and interpersonal relationship (n = 5).
Conclusion
Patient-reported outcomes serve as robust validators for advancing psychiatric and/or mental health nursing within hospital settings. Findings emphasise the importance of well-conceptualised nurse-sensitive patient outcomes using valid and reliable scales to recognise the full psychotherapeutic potential of mental health nursing.}},
author = {{Desmet, Karel and Vrancken, Bruce and Bergs, Jochen and Van Hecke, Ann and Deproost, Eddy and Bracke, Piet and Muylaert, Sofie and Verhaeghe, Sofie}},
issn = {{1351-0126}},
journal = {{JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC AND MENTAL HEALTH NURSING}},
keywords = {{hospitals,patient outcome assessment,psychiatric nursing,systematic reviews,treatment outcome,PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES,TURKISH VERSION,VALIDATION,DEPRESSION,INVENTORY,RELIABILITY,RECOVERY,VALIDITY,CARE,SCHIZOPHRENIA}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{5}},
pages = {{1159--1183}},
title = {{Patient‐reported outcomes, influencing factors, nursing care/intervention(s) and measurement scales of psychiatric and/or mental health nursing in hospitals : a systematic review}},
url = {{http://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.70006}},
volume = {{32}},
year = {{2025}},
}
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: