Tissue removal system versus bipolar resection for hysteroscopic polypectomy : long-term results
- Author
- Basiel Weyers (UGent) , Margot Van Geyte (UGent) , Alejandra De Frenne, Steven Weyers (UGent) , Hubertus van Vliet (UGent) , Steffi van Wessel (UGent) and Tjalina Hamerlynck (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- Objective This study aims to compare long-term outcomes, including recurrence of abnormal uterine bleeding and polyp recurrence, following hysteroscopic polypectomy using either a mechanical tissue removal system or bipolar resection. Material and methods This is a multicentre follow-up study of a randomised controlled trial comparing a tissue removal system with bipolar resection for hysteroscopic polypectomy. The study was conducted at Ghent University Hospital (Belgium) and Catharina Hospital Eindhoven (The Netherlands). The trial was approved by the ethical committees of both centres and registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05337046, April 2022). Thirty-eight patients (49.4%) were willing to participate in this follow-up study, with 19 patients in each group. The primary endpoint was abnormal uterine bleeding recurrence after the procedure. Secondary endpoints included polyp recurrence, symptom relief, patient-reported satisfaction, and need for additional treatments. Results Mean follow-up time was over nine years in both groups. The recurrence rate of abnormal uterine bleeding was 25% in the tissue removal system group and 40% in the bipolar resection group (p = .65), with a mean time to recurrence of 8.6 years (95% CI, 6.5–10.7 years) in the tissue removal system group and 8.1 years (95% CI, 5.8–10.5 years) in the bipolar resection group (p = .57). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in time to polyp recurrence (p = .93) or symptom relief between the two groups (p = .62). Conclusion This long-term follow-up study found no significant difference in the recurrence of abnormal uterine bleeding between a tissue removal system and bipolar resection for hysteroscopic polypectomy.
Downloads
-
1-s2.0-S294983842500009X-main.pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- open access
- |
- |
- 789.02 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-01JVJ8Y3TQ9D1X0EK1HCS5837C
- MLA
- Weyers, Basiel, et al. “Tissue Removal System versus Bipolar Resection for Hysteroscopic Polypectomy : Long-Term Results.” JOURNAL OF ENDOMETRIOSIS AND UTERINE DISORDERS, vol. 10, 2025, doi:10.1016/j.jeud.2025.100114.
- APA
- Weyers, B., Van Geyte, M., De Frenne, A., Weyers, S., van Vliet, H., van Wessel, S., & Hamerlynck, T. (2025). Tissue removal system versus bipolar resection for hysteroscopic polypectomy : long-term results. JOURNAL OF ENDOMETRIOSIS AND UTERINE DISORDERS, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeud.2025.100114
- Chicago author-date
- Weyers, Basiel, Margot Van Geyte, Alejandra De Frenne, Steven Weyers, Hubertus van Vliet, Steffi van Wessel, and Tjalina Hamerlynck. 2025. “Tissue Removal System versus Bipolar Resection for Hysteroscopic Polypectomy : Long-Term Results.” JOURNAL OF ENDOMETRIOSIS AND UTERINE DISORDERS 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeud.2025.100114.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Weyers, Basiel, Margot Van Geyte, Alejandra De Frenne, Steven Weyers, Hubertus van Vliet, Steffi van Wessel, and Tjalina Hamerlynck. 2025. “Tissue Removal System versus Bipolar Resection for Hysteroscopic Polypectomy : Long-Term Results.” JOURNAL OF ENDOMETRIOSIS AND UTERINE DISORDERS 10. doi:10.1016/j.jeud.2025.100114.
- Vancouver
- 1.Weyers B, Van Geyte M, De Frenne A, Weyers S, van Vliet H, van Wessel S, et al. Tissue removal system versus bipolar resection for hysteroscopic polypectomy : long-term results. JOURNAL OF ENDOMETRIOSIS AND UTERINE DISORDERS. 2025;10.
- IEEE
- [1]B. Weyers et al., “Tissue removal system versus bipolar resection for hysteroscopic polypectomy : long-term results,” JOURNAL OF ENDOMETRIOSIS AND UTERINE DISORDERS, vol. 10, 2025.
@article{01JVJ8Y3TQ9D1X0EK1HCS5837C,
abstract = {{Objective
This study aims to compare long-term outcomes, including recurrence of abnormal uterine bleeding and polyp recurrence, following hysteroscopic polypectomy using either a mechanical tissue removal system or bipolar resection.
Material and methods
This is a multicentre follow-up study of a randomised controlled trial comparing a tissue removal system with bipolar resection for hysteroscopic polypectomy. The study was conducted at Ghent University Hospital (Belgium) and Catharina Hospital Eindhoven (The Netherlands). The trial was approved by the ethical committees of both centres and registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05337046, April 2022). Thirty-eight patients (49.4%) were willing to participate in this follow-up study, with 19 patients in each group. The primary endpoint was abnormal uterine bleeding recurrence after the procedure. Secondary endpoints included polyp recurrence, symptom relief, patient-reported satisfaction, and need for additional treatments.
Results
Mean follow-up time was over nine years in both groups. The recurrence rate of abnormal uterine bleeding was 25% in the tissue removal system group and 40% in the bipolar resection group (p = .65), with a mean time to recurrence of 8.6 years (95% CI, 6.5–10.7 years) in the tissue removal system group and 8.1 years (95% CI, 5.8–10.5 years) in the bipolar resection group (p = .57). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in time to polyp recurrence (p = .93) or symptom relief between the two groups (p = .62).
Conclusion
This long-term follow-up study found no significant difference in the recurrence of abnormal uterine bleeding between a tissue removal system and bipolar resection for hysteroscopic polypectomy.}},
articleno = {{100114}},
author = {{Weyers, Basiel and Van Geyte, Margot and De Frenne, Alejandra and Weyers, Steven and van Vliet, Hubertus and van Wessel, Steffi and Hamerlynck, Tjalina}},
issn = {{2949-8384}},
journal = {{JOURNAL OF ENDOMETRIOSIS AND UTERINE DISORDERS}},
language = {{eng}},
pages = {{7}},
title = {{Tissue removal system versus bipolar resection for hysteroscopic polypectomy : long-term results}},
url = {{http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeud.2025.100114}},
volume = {{10}},
year = {{2025}},
}
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric