- Author
- Stijn Everaert, Lode Godderis, Jean-Marie Raquez, Greet Schoeters, Pieter Spanoghe (UGent) , Jonas Moens, Luc Hens, Olivier Michel, Dirk Adang and Norbert Fraeyman (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- The use of face masks has proven to be an effective preventive measure during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, concerns have emerged regarding the safety of metal (nano)particles incorporated into face masks for antimicrobial purposes. Specifically, this review examines the risks associated with TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs), which are classified as a possible human carcinogen. The inhalation of TiO2 NPs can cause multiple adverse effects, including oxidative stress, pulmonary inflammation, histopathological changes, and (secondary) genotoxicity. Different aspects are discussed, such as the composition and filtration efficiency of face masks, the antimicrobial mode of action and effectiveness of various metals, and the hazards of TiO2 NPs to human health, including exposure limits. A conservative risk assessment was conducted using different worst-case scenarios of potential (sub)chronic TiO2 exposure, derived from published leaching experiments. Most face masks are considered safe, especially for occasional or single use. However, the nanosafety of a minority of face masks on the European market may be inadequate for prolonged and intensive use. Important uncertainties remain, including the risks of combined exposure to TiO2 NPs and silver biocides, and the lack of direct exposure measurements. Considering the potential safety issues and the limited added protective value of TiO2 NPs, it is recommended to ban all applications of TiO2 in face masks based on the precautionary principle.
- Keywords
- inhalation exposure, TiO2, nanoparticles, human health, face masks, CARBON-BLACK, INHALATION EXPOSURE, PULMONARY CLEARANCE, PRESENT SITUATION, LUNG-CANCER, WORKERS, PARTICLES, MORTALITY, TOXICITY, RISK
Downloads
-
toxics-13-00244-v2.pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- open access
- |
- |
- 9.18 MB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-01JQDVZ55G25QZZ5CHS3T64CCS
- MLA
- Everaert, Stijn, et al. “Do We Need Titanium Dioxide (TiO2) Nanoparticles in Face Masks?” TOXICS, vol. 13, no. 4, 2025, doi:10.3390/toxics13040244.
- APA
- Everaert, S., Godderis, L., Raquez, J.-M., Schoeters, G., Spanoghe, P., Moens, J., … Fraeyman, N. (2025). Do we need titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles in face masks? TOXICS, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13040244
- Chicago author-date
- Everaert, Stijn, Lode Godderis, Jean-Marie Raquez, Greet Schoeters, Pieter Spanoghe, Jonas Moens, Luc Hens, Olivier Michel, Dirk Adang, and Norbert Fraeyman. 2025. “Do We Need Titanium Dioxide (TiO2) Nanoparticles in Face Masks?” TOXICS 13 (4). https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13040244.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Everaert, Stijn, Lode Godderis, Jean-Marie Raquez, Greet Schoeters, Pieter Spanoghe, Jonas Moens, Luc Hens, Olivier Michel, Dirk Adang, and Norbert Fraeyman. 2025. “Do We Need Titanium Dioxide (TiO2) Nanoparticles in Face Masks?” TOXICS 13 (4). doi:10.3390/toxics13040244.
- Vancouver
- 1.Everaert S, Godderis L, Raquez J-M, Schoeters G, Spanoghe P, Moens J, et al. Do we need titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles in face masks? TOXICS. 2025;13(4).
- IEEE
- [1]S. Everaert et al., “Do we need titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles in face masks?,” TOXICS, vol. 13, no. 4, 2025.
@article{01JQDVZ55G25QZZ5CHS3T64CCS, abstract = {{The use of face masks has proven to be an effective preventive measure during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, concerns have emerged regarding the safety of metal (nano)particles incorporated into face masks for antimicrobial purposes. Specifically, this review examines the risks associated with TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs), which are classified as a possible human carcinogen. The inhalation of TiO2 NPs can cause multiple adverse effects, including oxidative stress, pulmonary inflammation, histopathological changes, and (secondary) genotoxicity. Different aspects are discussed, such as the composition and filtration efficiency of face masks, the antimicrobial mode of action and effectiveness of various metals, and the hazards of TiO2 NPs to human health, including exposure limits. A conservative risk assessment was conducted using different worst-case scenarios of potential (sub)chronic TiO2 exposure, derived from published leaching experiments. Most face masks are considered safe, especially for occasional or single use. However, the nanosafety of a minority of face masks on the European market may be inadequate for prolonged and intensive use. Important uncertainties remain, including the risks of combined exposure to TiO2 NPs and silver biocides, and the lack of direct exposure measurements. Considering the potential safety issues and the limited added protective value of TiO2 NPs, it is recommended to ban all applications of TiO2 in face masks based on the precautionary principle.}}, articleno = {{244}}, author = {{Everaert, Stijn and Godderis, Lode and Raquez, Jean-Marie and Schoeters, Greet and Spanoghe, Pieter and Moens, Jonas and Hens, Luc and Michel, Olivier and Adang, Dirk and Fraeyman, Norbert}}, issn = {{2305-6304}}, journal = {{TOXICS}}, keywords = {{inhalation exposure,TiO2,nanoparticles,human health,face masks,CARBON-BLACK,INHALATION EXPOSURE,PULMONARY CLEARANCE,PRESENT SITUATION,LUNG-CANCER,WORKERS,PARTICLES,MORTALITY,TOXICITY,RISK}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{4}}, pages = {{29}}, title = {{Do we need titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles in face masks?}}, url = {{http://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13040244}}, volume = {{13}}, year = {{2025}}, }
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: