Advanced search
1 file | 775.45 KB Add to list

‘Did this really happen or not?’ : exploring news doubt and its antecedents

Author
Organization
Abstract
In recent decades, scholars have made great efforts to analyse and monitor audiences’ levels of trust in news and information. To capture these levels, research has primarily relied on concepts such as news (dis)trust, media scepticism or cynicism. While these concepts provide valuable insights, they also tend to oversimplify news consumers as either trusting or distrusting of the news, thereby ignoring the presence of uncertainty and variability in news evaluations. To fill this gap, this article explores variable experiences of news doubt, moments when people feel uncertain about the accuracy of a news story. Based on 31 semi-structured interviews with news consumers, this article first empirically explores how and when news doubt is experienced. Second, at a more theoretical level, it considers whether news doubt can truly be seen as a concept distinct from other related concepts such as news distrust or media scepticism. The results show that all participants experience moments of news doubt, but that it is interpreted in different ways and caused by a variety of triggers (e.g. sensationalism, partisanship). Conceptually, the findings suggest that news doubt may have explanatory value as a theoretical concept on its own.

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text (Corrected version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 775.45 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Peeters, Hanne, et al. “’Did This Really Happen or Not?’ : Exploring News Doubt and Its Antecedents.” JOURNAL OF APPLIED JOURNALISM & MEDIA STUDIES, 2025, doi:10.1386/ajms_00167_1.
APA
Peeters, H., Van Raemdonck, N., Van Nieuwenborgh, J., Opgenhaffen, M., Picone, I., & Van Aelst, P. (2025). ’Did this really happen or not?’ : exploring news doubt and its antecedents. JOURNAL OF APPLIED JOURNALISM & MEDIA STUDIES. https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms_00167_1
Chicago author-date
Peeters, Hanne, Nathalie Van Raemdonck, Joren Van Nieuwenborgh, Michaël Opgenhaffen, Ike Picone, and Peter Van Aelst. 2025. “’Did This Really Happen or Not?’ : Exploring News Doubt and Its Antecedents.” JOURNAL OF APPLIED JOURNALISM & MEDIA STUDIES. https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms_00167_1.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Peeters, Hanne, Nathalie Van Raemdonck, Joren Van Nieuwenborgh, Michaël Opgenhaffen, Ike Picone, and Peter Van Aelst. 2025. “’Did This Really Happen or Not?’ : Exploring News Doubt and Its Antecedents.” JOURNAL OF APPLIED JOURNALISM & MEDIA STUDIES. doi:10.1386/ajms_00167_1.
Vancouver
1.
Peeters H, Van Raemdonck N, Van Nieuwenborgh J, Opgenhaffen M, Picone I, Van Aelst P. ’Did this really happen or not?’ : exploring news doubt and its antecedents. JOURNAL OF APPLIED JOURNALISM & MEDIA STUDIES. 2025;
IEEE
[1]
H. Peeters, N. Van Raemdonck, J. Van Nieuwenborgh, M. Opgenhaffen, I. Picone, and P. Van Aelst, “’Did this really happen or not?’ : exploring news doubt and its antecedents,” JOURNAL OF APPLIED JOURNALISM & MEDIA STUDIES, 2025.
@article{01JPHN7WGQY3R9DJTRY9VBGTKB,
  abstract     = {{In recent decades, scholars have made great efforts to analyse and monitor audiences’ levels of trust in news and information. To capture these levels, research has primarily relied on concepts such as news (dis)trust, media scepticism or cynicism. While these concepts provide valuable insights, they also tend to oversimplify news consumers as either trusting or distrusting of the news, thereby ignoring the presence of uncertainty and variability in news evaluations. To fill this gap, this article explores variable experiences of news doubt, moments when people feel uncertain about the accuracy of a news story. Based on 31 semi-structured interviews with news consumers, this article first empirically explores how and when news doubt is experienced. Second, at a more theoretical level, it considers whether news doubt can truly be seen as a concept distinct from other related concepts such as news distrust or media scepticism. The results show that all participants experience moments of news doubt, but that it is interpreted in different ways and caused by a variety of triggers (e.g. sensationalism, partisanship). Conceptually, the findings suggest that news doubt may have explanatory value as a theoretical concept on its own.}},
  author       = {{Peeters, Hanne and Van Raemdonck, Nathalie and Van Nieuwenborgh, Joren and Opgenhaffen, Michaël and Picone, Ike and Van Aelst, Peter}},
  issn         = {{2001-0818}},
  journal      = {{JOURNAL OF APPLIED JOURNALISM & MEDIA STUDIES}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  title        = {{‘Did this really happen or not?’ : exploring news doubt and its antecedents}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1386/ajms_00167_1}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric