
The auditory-cognitive assessment of speech understanding : a comprehensive analysis of construct validity
- Author
- Louise Van Goylen (UGent) , Katrien Kestens (UGent) and Hannah Keppler (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- Objectives: Age-related hearing loss, the predominant global cause of hearing loss in middle-aged and older adults, presents a significant health and social problem, particularly affecting speech understanding. Beyond the auditory system, cognitive functions play a crucial role in speech understanding, especially in noisy environments. Although visual cognitive testing is commonly used as an intriguing alternative to mitigate the potential adverse effects of hearing loss on the perception of auditory test items, its efficacy within a hearing-related context is questionable due to construct differences. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the construct validity of auditory and visual versions of cognitive tests in predicting speech understanding, to identify the best suitable auditory or visual cognitive predictor(s) for implementation in the field of audiology. Design: Fifty-two middle-aged and older adults with normal hearing and 52 with hearing loss were included in the study (mean age for the total group: 67.38 years [SD: 7.71 years], range: 45 to 80 years). Both subgroups were matched based on age, sex, and educational level. Speech understanding in quiet (SPIQ) and in noise (SPIN) was assessed using the ecologically valid Dutch Linguistically Controlled Sentences test. An extensive cognitive test battery was assembled, encompassing measures of sustained attention, working memory, processing speed, and cognitive flexibility and inhibition, through both auditory and visual assessments. Correlation coefficients examined the relationship between the independent variables (demographics and cognition), and SPIQ and SPIN separately. Identified predictors underwent stepwise and hierarchical multiple regression analyses, with significant variables included in final multiple regression models for SPIQ and SPIN separately. Results: The final multiple regression models demonstrated statistically significant predictions for SPIQ (adjusted R2 = 0.699) and SPIN (adjusted R2 = 0.776). Audiometric hearing status and auditory working memory significantly contributed to predicting SPIQ, while age, educational level, audiometric hearing status, auditory sustained attention, and auditory working memory played significant roles in predicting SPIN. Conclusions: This study underscores the necessity of exploring construct validity of cognitive tests within audiological research. The findings advocate for the superiority of auditory cognitive tests over visual testing in relation to speech understanding.
- Keywords
- Aging, Cognition, Cognitive construct validity, Presbyacusis, Speech understanding, WORKING-MEMORY, HEARING-LOSS, OLDER-ADULTS, ELDERLY LISTENERS, AGE, RECOGNITION, TESTS, MOCA
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 550.26 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-01JP2TMA8DJMJPR3ZRT589XBZD
- MLA
- Van Goylen, Louise, et al. “The Auditory-Cognitive Assessment of Speech Understanding : A Comprehensive Analysis of Construct Validity.” EAR AND HEARING, vol. 46, no. 4, 2025, pp. 1044–55, doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000001649.
- APA
- Van Goylen, L., Kestens, K., & Keppler, H. (2025). The auditory-cognitive assessment of speech understanding : a comprehensive analysis of construct validity. EAR AND HEARING, 46(4), 1044–1055. https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000001649
- Chicago author-date
- Van Goylen, Louise, Katrien Kestens, and Hannah Keppler. 2025. “The Auditory-Cognitive Assessment of Speech Understanding : A Comprehensive Analysis of Construct Validity.” EAR AND HEARING 46 (4): 1044–55. https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000001649.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Van Goylen, Louise, Katrien Kestens, and Hannah Keppler. 2025. “The Auditory-Cognitive Assessment of Speech Understanding : A Comprehensive Analysis of Construct Validity.” EAR AND HEARING 46 (4): 1044–1055. doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000001649.
- Vancouver
- 1.Van Goylen L, Kestens K, Keppler H. The auditory-cognitive assessment of speech understanding : a comprehensive analysis of construct validity. EAR AND HEARING. 2025;46(4):1044–55.
- IEEE
- [1]L. Van Goylen, K. Kestens, and H. Keppler, “The auditory-cognitive assessment of speech understanding : a comprehensive analysis of construct validity,” EAR AND HEARING, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 1044–1055, 2025.
@article{01JP2TMA8DJMJPR3ZRT589XBZD, abstract = {{Objectives: Age-related hearing loss, the predominant global cause of hearing loss in middle-aged and older adults, presents a significant health and social problem, particularly affecting speech understanding. Beyond the auditory system, cognitive functions play a crucial role in speech understanding, especially in noisy environments. Although visual cognitive testing is commonly used as an intriguing alternative to mitigate the potential adverse effects of hearing loss on the perception of auditory test items, its efficacy within a hearing-related context is questionable due to construct differences. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the construct validity of auditory and visual versions of cognitive tests in predicting speech understanding, to identify the best suitable auditory or visual cognitive predictor(s) for implementation in the field of audiology. Design: Fifty-two middle-aged and older adults with normal hearing and 52 with hearing loss were included in the study (mean age for the total group: 67.38 years [SD: 7.71 years], range: 45 to 80 years). Both subgroups were matched based on age, sex, and educational level. Speech understanding in quiet (SPIQ) and in noise (SPIN) was assessed using the ecologically valid Dutch Linguistically Controlled Sentences test. An extensive cognitive test battery was assembled, encompassing measures of sustained attention, working memory, processing speed, and cognitive flexibility and inhibition, through both auditory and visual assessments. Correlation coefficients examined the relationship between the independent variables (demographics and cognition), and SPIQ and SPIN separately. Identified predictors underwent stepwise and hierarchical multiple regression analyses, with significant variables included in final multiple regression models for SPIQ and SPIN separately. Results: The final multiple regression models demonstrated statistically significant predictions for SPIQ (adjusted R2 = 0.699) and SPIN (adjusted R2 = 0.776). Audiometric hearing status and auditory working memory significantly contributed to predicting SPIQ, while age, educational level, audiometric hearing status, auditory sustained attention, and auditory working memory played significant roles in predicting SPIN. Conclusions: This study underscores the necessity of exploring construct validity of cognitive tests within audiological research. The findings advocate for the superiority of auditory cognitive tests over visual testing in relation to speech understanding.}}, author = {{Van Goylen, Louise and Kestens, Katrien and Keppler, Hannah}}, issn = {{0196-0202}}, journal = {{EAR AND HEARING}}, keywords = {{Aging,Cognition,Cognitive construct validity,Presbyacusis,Speech understanding,WORKING-MEMORY,HEARING-LOSS,OLDER-ADULTS,ELDERLY LISTENERS,AGE,RECOGNITION,TESTS,MOCA}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{4}}, pages = {{1044--1055}}, title = {{The auditory-cognitive assessment of speech understanding : a comprehensive analysis of construct validity}}, url = {{http://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000001649}}, volume = {{46}}, year = {{2025}}, }
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: