Advanced search
Add to list

The differences of damage initiation and accumulation of DP steels : a numerical and experimental analysis

Author
Organization
Abstract
Many studies have examined the damage behaviour of dual-phase steels already. It is a topic of high interest, since understanding the mechanisms of damage during forming processes enables the production of steels with improved properties and damage tolerance. However, the focus was rarely on the comparison between representatives of this steel class, and the numerical simulation for the quantification of damage states was not thoroughly used. Therefore, this study compares the damage initiation and accumulation of two dual-phase steels (DP800 and DP1000), which are used in the automotive industry. Additionally, parameter sets of a phenomenological damage mechanics model with coupled damage evolution are calibrated for each material. The combined analysis reveals an earlier initiation of damage for the DP800, where the damage accumulation phase is prolonged. For DP1000 the damage nucleates only shortly before material failure. The material model is able to correctly predict the behaviour, while experimental analysis confirms the prediction via light optical and SEM metallography.
Keywords
BAI-WIERZBICKI MODEL, DUAL-PHASE STEELS, DUCTILE FRACTURE, MARTENSITE DISTRIBUTION, EVOLUTION, BEHAVIOR, DEFORMATION, MECHANISMS, NUCLEATION, PLASTICITY, Steel, Dual-phase, Ductile damage, Damage model, FEM simulation, Damage tolerance

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Puetz, Felix, et al. “The Differences of Damage Initiation and Accumulation of DP Steels : A Numerical and Experimental Analysis.” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FRACTURE, vol. 226, no. 1, 2020, pp. 1–15, doi:10.1007/s10704-020-00457-z.
APA
Puetz, F., Shen, F., Koenemann, M., & Muenstermann, S. (2020). The differences of damage initiation and accumulation of DP steels : a numerical and experimental analysis. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FRACTURE, 226(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-020-00457-z
Chicago author-date
Puetz, Felix, Fuhui Shen, Markus Koenemann, and Sebastian Muenstermann. 2020. “The Differences of Damage Initiation and Accumulation of DP Steels : A Numerical and Experimental Analysis.” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FRACTURE 226 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-020-00457-z.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Puetz, Felix, Fuhui Shen, Markus Koenemann, and Sebastian Muenstermann. 2020. “The Differences of Damage Initiation and Accumulation of DP Steels : A Numerical and Experimental Analysis.” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FRACTURE 226 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1007/s10704-020-00457-z.
Vancouver
1.
Puetz F, Shen F, Koenemann M, Muenstermann S. The differences of damage initiation and accumulation of DP steels : a numerical and experimental analysis. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FRACTURE. 2020;226(1):1–15.
IEEE
[1]
F. Puetz, F. Shen, M. Koenemann, and S. Muenstermann, “The differences of damage initiation and accumulation of DP steels : a numerical and experimental analysis,” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FRACTURE, vol. 226, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2020.
@article{01JNDT7E6Z32VC1094VTRQ8TPC,
  abstract     = {{Many studies have examined the damage behaviour of dual-phase steels already. It is a topic of high interest, since understanding the mechanisms of damage during forming processes enables the production of steels with improved properties and damage tolerance. However, the focus was rarely on the comparison between representatives of this steel class, and the numerical simulation for the quantification of damage states was not thoroughly used. Therefore, this study compares the damage initiation and accumulation of two dual-phase steels (DP800 and DP1000), which are used in the automotive industry. Additionally, parameter sets of a phenomenological damage mechanics model with coupled damage evolution are calibrated for each material. The combined analysis reveals an earlier initiation of damage for the DP800, where the damage accumulation phase is prolonged. For DP1000 the damage nucleates only shortly before material failure. The material model is able to correctly predict the behaviour, while experimental analysis confirms the prediction via light optical and SEM metallography.}},
  author       = {{Puetz, Felix and Shen, Fuhui and Koenemann, Markus and Muenstermann, Sebastian}},
  issn         = {{0376-9429}},
  journal      = {{INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FRACTURE}},
  keywords     = {{BAI-WIERZBICKI MODEL,DUAL-PHASE STEELS,DUCTILE FRACTURE,MARTENSITE DISTRIBUTION,EVOLUTION,BEHAVIOR,DEFORMATION,MECHANISMS,NUCLEATION,PLASTICITY,Steel,Dual-phase,Ductile damage,Damage model,FEM simulation,Damage tolerance}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{1--15}},
  title        = {{The differences of damage initiation and accumulation of DP steels : a numerical and experimental analysis}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-020-00457-z}},
  volume       = {{226}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: