- Author
- Nele De Poortere (UGent) , Sarineh Keshishzadeh, Hannah Keppler (UGent) , Ingeborg Dhooge (UGent) and Sarah Verhulst (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- The quest for noninvasive early markers for sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) has yielded diverse measures of interest. However, comprehensive studies evaluating the test-retest reliability of multiple measures and stimuli within a single study are scarce, and a standardized clinical protocol for robust early markers of SNHL remains elusive. To address these gaps, this study explores the intra-subject variability of various potential EEG-biomarkers for cochlear synaptopathy (CS) and other SNHL-markers in the same individuals. Fifteen normal-hearing young adults underwent repeated measures of (extended high-frequency) pure-tone audiometry, speech-in-noise intelligibility, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), and auditory evoked potentials; comprising envelope following responses (EFR) and auditory brainstem responses (ABR). Results confirm high reliability in pure-tone audiometry, whereas the matrix sentence-test exhibited a significant learning effect. The reliability of DPOAEs varied across three evaluation methods, each employing distinct SNR-based criteria for DPOAE-datapoints. EFRs exhibited superior test-retest reliability compared to ABR-amplitudes. Our findings emphasize the need for careful interpretation of presumed noninvasive SNHL measures. While tonal-audiometry’s robustness was corroborated, we observed a confounding learning effect in longitudinal speech audiometry. The variability in DPOAEs highlights the importance of consistent ear probe replacement and meticulous measurement techniques, indicating that DPOAE test-retest reliability is significantly compromised under less-than-ideal conditions. As potential EEG-biomarkers of CS, EFRs are preferred over ABR-amplitudes based on the current study results.
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 1.53 MB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-01JJPGPYJZEA83WTAM50WPAS50
- MLA
- De Poortere, Nele, et al. “Intrasubject Variability in Potential Early Markers of Sensorineural Hearing Damage.” MedRxiv, 2024, doi:10.1101/2024.01.18.24301474.
- APA
- De Poortere, N., Keshishzadeh, S., Keppler, H., Dhooge, I., & Verhulst, S. (2024). Intrasubject variability in potential early markers of sensorineural hearing damage. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.18.24301474
- Chicago author-date
- De Poortere, Nele, Sarineh Keshishzadeh, Hannah Keppler, Ingeborg Dhooge, and Sarah Verhulst. 2024. “Intrasubject Variability in Potential Early Markers of Sensorineural Hearing Damage.” MedRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.18.24301474.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- De Poortere, Nele, Sarineh Keshishzadeh, Hannah Keppler, Ingeborg Dhooge, and Sarah Verhulst. 2024. “Intrasubject Variability in Potential Early Markers of Sensorineural Hearing Damage.” MedRxiv. doi:10.1101/2024.01.18.24301474.
- Vancouver
- 1.De Poortere N, Keshishzadeh S, Keppler H, Dhooge I, Verhulst S. Intrasubject variability in potential early markers of sensorineural hearing damage. medRxiv. 2024.
- IEEE
- [1]N. De Poortere, S. Keshishzadeh, H. Keppler, I. Dhooge, and S. Verhulst, “Intrasubject variability in potential early markers of sensorineural hearing damage,” medRxiv. 2024.
@misc{01JJPGPYJZEA83WTAM50WPAS50,
abstract = {{The quest for noninvasive early markers for sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) has yielded diverse measures of interest. However, comprehensive studies evaluating the test-retest reliability of multiple measures and stimuli within a single study are scarce, and a standardized clinical protocol for robust early markers of SNHL remains elusive. To address these gaps, this study explores the intra-subject variability of various potential EEG-biomarkers for cochlear synaptopathy (CS) and other SNHL-markers in the same individuals. Fifteen normal-hearing young adults underwent repeated measures of (extended high-frequency) pure-tone audiometry, speech-in-noise intelligibility, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), and auditory evoked potentials; comprising envelope following responses (EFR) and auditory brainstem responses (ABR). Results confirm high reliability in pure-tone audiometry, whereas the matrix sentence-test exhibited a significant learning effect. The reliability of DPOAEs varied across three evaluation methods, each employing distinct SNR-based criteria for DPOAE-datapoints. EFRs exhibited superior test-retest reliability compared to ABR-amplitudes. Our findings emphasize the need for careful interpretation of presumed noninvasive SNHL measures. While tonal-audiometry’s robustness was corroborated, we observed a confounding learning effect in longitudinal speech audiometry. The variability in DPOAEs highlights the importance of consistent ear probe replacement and meticulous measurement techniques, indicating that DPOAE test-retest reliability is significantly compromised under less-than-ideal conditions. As potential EEG-biomarkers of CS, EFRs are preferred over ABR-amplitudes based on the current study results.}},
author = {{De Poortere, Nele and Keshishzadeh, Sarineh and Keppler, Hannah and Dhooge, Ingeborg and Verhulst, Sarah}},
language = {{eng}},
pages = {{45}},
series = {{medRxiv}},
title = {{Intrasubject variability in potential early markers of sensorineural hearing damage}},
url = {{http://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.18.24301474}},
year = {{2024}},
}
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric