Advanced search
1 file | 765.33 KB Add to list

Time for tea : measuring discounting for money and consumption without the utility confound

Author
Organization
Abstract
We present a novel method-called risk equivalents-that uses a single measure to elicit discount rates while avoiding concerns about the shape of the utility function. The method is valid under discounted expected utility (DEU), and also under several of its behavioral extensions including more general models that account for a biased perception of time and risk (such as time- or likelihood -insensitivity). We implement the method in a field experiment in India measuring inter -temporal discount rates for money and the consumption of tea. We empirically observe that discount rates elicited by traditional methods are related to utility curvature, whereas discount rates elicited by risk equivalents are not. Risk equivalents also mitigate differences in discount rates measured for money and for tea, suggesting that unaddressed utility curvature may play a role in results that demonstrate good -specific discounting. Risk equivalents are general, fast and tractable, three features that are particularly useful in field studies.
Keywords
Time discounting, Money vs consumption, Utility confound, PROSPECT-THEORY, PREFERENCES, PROBABILITY, RISK

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 765.33 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Abdellaoui, Mohammed, et al. “Time for Tea : Measuring Discounting for Money and Consumption without the Utility Confound.” JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, vol. 168, 2024, doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2024.103261.
APA
Abdellaoui, M., Kemel, E., Panin, A., & Vieider, F. (2024). Time for tea : measuring discounting for money and consumption without the utility confound. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2024.103261
Chicago author-date
Abdellaoui, Mohammed, Emmanuel Kemel, Amma Panin, and Ferdinand Vieider. 2024. “Time for Tea : Measuring Discounting for Money and Consumption without the Utility Confound.” JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2024.103261.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Abdellaoui, Mohammed, Emmanuel Kemel, Amma Panin, and Ferdinand Vieider. 2024. “Time for Tea : Measuring Discounting for Money and Consumption without the Utility Confound.” JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS 168. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2024.103261.
Vancouver
1.
Abdellaoui M, Kemel E, Panin A, Vieider F. Time for tea : measuring discounting for money and consumption without the utility confound. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS. 2024;168.
IEEE
[1]
M. Abdellaoui, E. Kemel, A. Panin, and F. Vieider, “Time for tea : measuring discounting for money and consumption without the utility confound,” JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, vol. 168, 2024.
@article{01JHFARZEXPHP83GKGMY4V8TFC,
  abstract     = {{We present a novel method-called risk equivalents-that uses a single measure to elicit discount rates while avoiding concerns about the shape of the utility function. The method is valid under discounted expected utility (DEU), and also under several of its behavioral extensions including more general models that account for a biased perception of time and risk (such as time- or likelihood -insensitivity). We implement the method in a field experiment in India measuring inter -temporal discount rates for money and the consumption of tea. We empirically observe that discount rates elicited by traditional methods are related to utility curvature, whereas discount rates elicited by risk equivalents are not. Risk equivalents also mitigate differences in discount rates measured for money and for tea, suggesting that unaddressed utility curvature may play a role in results that demonstrate good -specific discounting. Risk equivalents are general, fast and tractable, three features that are particularly useful in field studies.}},
  articleno    = {{103261}},
  author       = {{Abdellaoui, Mohammed and Kemel, Emmanuel and Panin, Amma and Vieider, Ferdinand}},
  issn         = {{0304-3878}},
  journal      = {{JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS}},
  keywords     = {{Time discounting,Money vs consumption,Utility confound,PROSPECT-THEORY,PREFERENCES,PROBABILITY,RISK}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{8}},
  title        = {{Time for tea : measuring discounting for money and consumption without the utility confound}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2024.103261}},
  volume       = {{168}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: