
Digital disconnection as a plight or right? A manifesto to re-imagine digital disconnection as a reasonable accommodation
- Author
- Mariek Vanden Abeele (UGent) , Marijn Martens (UGent) , Sarah Anrijs (UGent) , Sara Van Bruyssel (UGent) and David de Segovia Vicente (UGent)
- Organization
- Project
- Abstract
- We ask in this chapter to re-imagine digital disconnection as not just a luxury or rational choice, but also a reasonable accommodation for equal participation in society, particularly to those with impaired self-regulation. We substantiate this argument by arguing that impaired self-regulation makes individuals much more vulnerable to the addictive design of digital devices and platforms. Yet, in a digital first society, in which ubiquitous connectivity has become the default, it has become near-impossible to not use them. Caught in this double bind, digital disconnection is likely a necessary aid to individuals with impaired self-regulation to function without significant limitations or difficulties. We therefore argue that failing to recognizse and facilitate digital disconnection as a reasonable accommodation to these individuals is problematic and potentially even discriminatory. We thus plead for a re-imagination of digital disconnection and call for its effective realisation as a right for all.
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text (Accepted manuscript)
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 483.24 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-01JH7TWJ9AJB3YJS3K0HZVZ6YC
- MLA
- Vanden Abeele, Mariek, et al. “Digital Disconnection as a Plight or Right? A Manifesto to Re-Imagine Digital Disconnection as a Reasonable Accommodation.” The Right Not to Use the Internet : Concept, Contexts, Consequences, edited by Dariusz Kloza et al., Routledge, 2025.
- APA
- Vanden Abeele, M., Martens, M., Anrijs, S., Van Bruyssel, S., & de Segovia Vicente, D. (2025). Digital disconnection as a plight or right? A manifesto to re-imagine digital disconnection as a reasonable accommodation. In D. Kloza, E. Kużelewska, E. Lievens, & V. Verdoodt (Eds.), The right not to use the internet : concept, contexts, consequences. London: Routledge.
- Chicago author-date
- Vanden Abeele, Mariek, Marijn Martens, Sarah Anrijs, Sara Van Bruyssel, and David de Segovia Vicente. 2025. “Digital Disconnection as a Plight or Right? A Manifesto to Re-Imagine Digital Disconnection as a Reasonable Accommodation.” In The Right Not to Use the Internet : Concept, Contexts, Consequences, edited by Dariusz Kloza, Elżbieta Kużelewska, Eva Lievens, and Valerie Verdoodt. London: Routledge.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Vanden Abeele, Mariek, Marijn Martens, Sarah Anrijs, Sara Van Bruyssel, and David de Segovia Vicente. 2025. “Digital Disconnection as a Plight or Right? A Manifesto to Re-Imagine Digital Disconnection as a Reasonable Accommodation.” In The Right Not to Use the Internet : Concept, Contexts, Consequences, ed by. Dariusz Kloza, Elżbieta Kużelewska, Eva Lievens, and Valerie Verdoodt. London: Routledge.
- Vancouver
- 1.Vanden Abeele M, Martens M, Anrijs S, Van Bruyssel S, de Segovia Vicente D. Digital disconnection as a plight or right? A manifesto to re-imagine digital disconnection as a reasonable accommodation. In: Kloza D, Kużelewska E, Lievens E, Verdoodt V, editors. The right not to use the internet : concept, contexts, consequences. London: Routledge; 2025.
- IEEE
- [1]M. Vanden Abeele, M. Martens, S. Anrijs, S. Van Bruyssel, and D. de Segovia Vicente, “Digital disconnection as a plight or right? A manifesto to re-imagine digital disconnection as a reasonable accommodation,” in The right not to use the internet : concept, contexts, consequences, D. Kloza, E. Kużelewska, E. Lievens, and V. Verdoodt, Eds. London: Routledge, 2025.
@incollection{01JH7TWJ9AJB3YJS3K0HZVZ6YC, abstract = {{We ask in this chapter to re-imagine digital disconnection as not just a luxury or rational choice, but also a reasonable accommodation for equal participation in society, particularly to those with impaired self-regulation. We substantiate this argument by arguing that impaired self-regulation makes individuals much more vulnerable to the addictive design of digital devices and platforms. Yet, in a digital first society, in which ubiquitous connectivity has become the default, it has become near-impossible to not use them. Caught in this double bind, digital disconnection is likely a necessary aid to individuals with impaired self-regulation to function without significant limitations or difficulties. We therefore argue that failing to recognizse and facilitate digital disconnection as a reasonable accommodation to these individuals is problematic and potentially even discriminatory. We thus plead for a re-imagination of digital disconnection and call for its effective realisation as a right for all.}}, author = {{Vanden Abeele, Mariek and Martens, Marijn and Anrijs, Sarah and Van Bruyssel, Sara and de Segovia Vicente, David}}, booktitle = {{The right not to use the internet : concept, contexts, consequences}}, editor = {{Kloza, Dariusz and Kużelewska, Elżbieta and Lievens, Eva and Verdoodt, Valerie}}, isbn = {{9781032866314}}, language = {{eng}}, publisher = {{Routledge}}, title = {{Digital disconnection as a plight or right? A manifesto to re-imagine digital disconnection as a reasonable accommodation}}, year = {{2025}}, }