Advanced search
1 file | 2.02 MB Add to list

Action potential threshold variability for different electrostimulation models and its potential impact on occupational exposure limit values

Author
Organization
Project
Abstract
Occupational exposure limit values (ELVs) for body internal electric fields can be derived from thresholds for action potential generation. These thresholds can be calculated with electrostimulation models. The spatially extended nonlinear node model (SENN) is often used to determine such thresholds. Important parameters of these models are the membrane channel dynamics describing the ionic transmembrane currents as well as the temperature at which the models operate. This work compares action potential thresholds for five different membrane channel dynamics used with the SENN model. Furthermore, two more detailed double-cable models by Gaines et al. (MRG-Sensory and MRG-Motor) are also considered in this work. Thresholds calculated with the SENN model and the MRG models are compared for frequencies between 1 Hz and 100 kHz and temperatures at 22 degrees C and 37 degrees C. Results show that MRG thresholds are lower than SENN thresholds. Deriving alternative ELVs from these thresholds shows that the alternative ELVs can change significantly with different ion channel dynamics (up to a factor of 22). Using the double cable model could lead to approximately ten times lower alternative exposure limit values. On the contrary, using the SENN model with different membrane channel dynamics could also lead to higher alternative exposure limit values. Therefore, future exposure guidelines should take the influence of different electrostimulation models into account when deriving ELVs.
Keywords
COCHLEAR NEURAL MEMBRANE, NERVE-FIBERS, STIMULATION, CURRENTS, EXCITABILITY, NODE, axon modeling, electromagnetic exposure, intermediate frequencies, membrane channel dynamics, safety guidelines and standards

Downloads

  • WICA 1221.pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 2.02 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Soyka, Florian, et al. “Action Potential Threshold Variability for Different Electrostimulation Models and Its Potential Impact on Occupational Exposure Limit Values.” BIOELECTROMAGNETICS, vol. 46, no. 1, 2025, doi:10.1002/bem.22529.
APA
Soyka, F., Tarnaud, T., Altekoester, C., Schoeters, R., Plovie, T., Joseph, W., & Tanghe, E. (2025). Action potential threshold variability for different electrostimulation models and its potential impact on occupational exposure limit values. BIOELECTROMAGNETICS, 46(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.22529
Chicago author-date
Soyka, Florian, Thomas Tarnaud, Carsten Altekoester, Ruben Schoeters, Tom Plovie, Wout Joseph, and Emmeric Tanghe. 2025. “Action Potential Threshold Variability for Different Electrostimulation Models and Its Potential Impact on Occupational Exposure Limit Values.” BIOELECTROMAGNETICS 46 (1). https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.22529.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Soyka, Florian, Thomas Tarnaud, Carsten Altekoester, Ruben Schoeters, Tom Plovie, Wout Joseph, and Emmeric Tanghe. 2025. “Action Potential Threshold Variability for Different Electrostimulation Models and Its Potential Impact on Occupational Exposure Limit Values.” BIOELECTROMAGNETICS 46 (1). doi:10.1002/bem.22529.
Vancouver
1.
Soyka F, Tarnaud T, Altekoester C, Schoeters R, Plovie T, Joseph W, et al. Action potential threshold variability for different electrostimulation models and its potential impact on occupational exposure limit values. BIOELECTROMAGNETICS. 2025;46(1).
IEEE
[1]
F. Soyka et al., “Action potential threshold variability for different electrostimulation models and its potential impact on occupational exposure limit values,” BIOELECTROMAGNETICS, vol. 46, no. 1, 2025.
@article{01JH02SF2Z3E6Q9A4KESCHAP9V,
  abstract     = {{Occupational exposure limit values (ELVs) for body internal electric fields can be derived from thresholds for action potential generation. These thresholds can be calculated with electrostimulation models. The spatially extended nonlinear node model (SENN) is often used to determine such thresholds. Important parameters of these models are the membrane channel dynamics describing the ionic transmembrane currents as well as the temperature at which the models operate. This work compares action potential thresholds for five different membrane channel dynamics used with the SENN model. Furthermore, two more detailed double-cable models by Gaines et al. (MRG-Sensory and MRG-Motor) are also considered in this work. Thresholds calculated with the SENN model and the MRG models are compared for frequencies between 1 Hz and 100 kHz and temperatures at 22 degrees C and 37 degrees C. Results show that MRG thresholds are lower than SENN thresholds. Deriving alternative ELVs from these thresholds shows that the alternative ELVs can change significantly with different ion channel dynamics (up to a factor of 22). Using the double cable model could lead to approximately ten times lower alternative exposure limit values. On the contrary, using the SENN model with different membrane channel dynamics could also lead to higher alternative exposure limit values. Therefore, future exposure guidelines should take the influence of different electrostimulation models into account when deriving ELVs.}},
  articleno    = {{e22529}},
  author       = {{Soyka, Florian and Tarnaud, Thomas and Altekoester, Carsten and Schoeters, Ruben and Plovie, Tom and Joseph, Wout and Tanghe, Emmeric}},
  issn         = {{0197-8462}},
  journal      = {{BIOELECTROMAGNETICS}},
  keywords     = {{COCHLEAR NEURAL MEMBRANE,NERVE-FIBERS,STIMULATION,CURRENTS,EXCITABILITY,NODE,axon modeling,electromagnetic exposure,intermediate frequencies,membrane channel dynamics,safety guidelines and standards}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{9}},
  title        = {{Action potential threshold variability for different electrostimulation models and its potential impact on occupational exposure limit values}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1002/bem.22529}},
  volume       = {{46}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: