Strengthening the Paris Agreement through trade? The potential and limitations of EU preferential trade agreements for climate governance
- Author
- Caroline Bertram and Hermine Van Coppenolle (UGent)
- Organization
- Project
- Abstract
- Since 2019, a commitment has been included in the European Union's (EU) preferential trade agreements to effectively implement the Paris Agreement. This commitment now exists in nine ratified or pending trade agreements. Yet research into the legal nature and institutional implications of this linkage between the Paris Agreement and EU trade agreements remains scant. Relying on the governance stringency framework, we explore the evolution of this commitment across EU trade agreements, highlighting its transition from a statement of shared intent into a legally binding obligation. We argue that the EU's latest trade agreements increase the cost of withdrawing from the Paris Agreement and bolster the Paris Agreement's obligations of conduct, namely parties' procedural duties, the expectation of progressively more ambitious climate pledges, and the commitment of all parties to realise these to the best of their efforts. Finally, we suggest that the implementation and enforcement mechanisms available through EU trade agreements in the context of the Paris Agreement commitment may prove pivotal in realising the climate regime's objectives.
- Keywords
- Climate change, Trade policy, EU, Institutional linkage, Trade, agreements, Paris Agreement, Governance stringency, Legalisation, Trade-climate nexus, Sustainable development, ENVIRONMENTAL PROVISIONS, OBLIGATIONS, NORMS
Downloads
-
s10784-024-09653-x.pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- open access
- |
- |
- 1.67 MB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-01JDM5FQHRXQ9DB822DB54EX1Z
- MLA
- Bertram, Caroline, and Hermine Van Coppenolle. “Strengthening the Paris Agreement through Trade? The Potential and Limitations of EU Preferential Trade Agreements for Climate Governance.” INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS, vol. 24, no. 4, 2024, pp. 589–610, doi:10.1007/s10784-024-09653-x.
- APA
- Bertram, C., & Van Coppenolle, H. (2024). Strengthening the Paris Agreement through trade? The potential and limitations of EU preferential trade agreements for climate governance. INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS, 24(4), 589–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-024-09653-x
- Chicago author-date
- Bertram, Caroline, and Hermine Van Coppenolle. 2024. “Strengthening the Paris Agreement through Trade? The Potential and Limitations of EU Preferential Trade Agreements for Climate Governance.” INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS 24 (4): 589–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-024-09653-x.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Bertram, Caroline, and Hermine Van Coppenolle. 2024. “Strengthening the Paris Agreement through Trade? The Potential and Limitations of EU Preferential Trade Agreements for Climate Governance.” INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS 24 (4): 589–610. doi:10.1007/s10784-024-09653-x.
- Vancouver
- 1.Bertram C, Van Coppenolle H. Strengthening the Paris Agreement through trade? The potential and limitations of EU preferential trade agreements for climate governance. INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS. 2024;24(4):589–610.
- IEEE
- [1]C. Bertram and H. Van Coppenolle, “Strengthening the Paris Agreement through trade? The potential and limitations of EU preferential trade agreements for climate governance,” INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 589–610, 2024.
@article{01JDM5FQHRXQ9DB822DB54EX1Z,
abstract = {{Since 2019, a commitment has been included in the European Union's (EU) preferential trade agreements to effectively implement the Paris Agreement. This commitment now exists in nine ratified or pending trade agreements. Yet research into the legal nature and institutional implications of this linkage between the Paris Agreement and EU trade agreements remains scant. Relying on the governance stringency framework, we explore the evolution of this commitment across EU trade agreements, highlighting its transition from a statement of shared intent into a legally binding obligation. We argue that the EU's latest trade agreements increase the cost of withdrawing from the Paris Agreement and bolster the Paris Agreement's obligations of conduct, namely parties' procedural duties, the expectation of progressively more ambitious climate pledges, and the commitment of all parties to realise these to the best of their efforts. Finally, we suggest that the implementation and enforcement mechanisms available through EU trade agreements in the context of the Paris Agreement commitment may prove pivotal in realising the climate regime's objectives.}},
author = {{Bertram, Caroline and Van Coppenolle, Hermine}},
issn = {{1567-9764}},
journal = {{INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS}},
keywords = {{Climate change,Trade policy,EU,Institutional linkage,Trade,agreements,Paris Agreement,Governance stringency,Legalisation,Trade-climate nexus,Sustainable development,ENVIRONMENTAL PROVISIONS,OBLIGATIONS,NORMS}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{4}},
pages = {{589--610}},
title = {{Strengthening the Paris Agreement through trade? The potential and limitations of EU preferential trade agreements for climate governance}},
url = {{http://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-024-09653-x}},
volume = {{24}},
year = {{2024}},
}
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: