@article{01JD4DD0H28E9XV3461Z69YEJJ,
  abstract     = {{BackgroundPalliative care is becoming an essential component of healthcare, but there is insufficient research on how integration across different levels of care (micro, meso, and macro) is realized in practice. Without such integration, care may become fragmented, leading to suboptimal patient outcomes. While many studies have explored palliative care models, there is a gap in understanding how priorities for integrated care align across these levels within healthcare ecosystems. Specifically, it is unclear whether key actions at each level are shared, coordinated, and supported effectively, making it difficult to implement sustainable, cohesive care strategies. Our study aims to explore the extent to which important goals (i.e., priorities) are shared across the micro, meso, and macro levels of the palliative care ecosystem in Flanders, Belgium.MethodsWe applied a multimethod study using the analytic hierarchy process method (AHP). This consists of three sequential steps: a broad literature search and interviews with Belgian stakeholders (n = 12) to determine the criteria for the organization of integrated care; focus groups (n = 8) with patients, their relatives and caregivers to establish the completeness and relevance of the criteria; and prioritization of the criteria using a questionnaire among 305 Flemish participants (patients, relatives, caregivers and policy makers).ResultsOur findings revealed that integration is imbalanced, with priorities being most emphasized at the micro level (57%), followed by the meso (29%) and macro (14%) level. Functional enablers dominate at the macro (80%) and meso organizational level (67%), while normative enablers are emphasized at the meso professional (67%) and micro level (75%). Effective palliative care requires vertical coordination of these enablers: for instance, transparent communication with patients at the micro level depends on cross-organizational information exchange at the meso level, supported by a unified data system at the macro level.ConclusionAchieving integrated palliative care requires deliberate alignment of priorities across all levels of the ecosystem. While each level plays a unique role, palliative care is comprehensive and effective only by sharing both functional and normative enablers across micro, meso, and macro level.}},
  articleno    = {{250}},
  author       = {{De Regge, Melissa and Gemmel, Paul and Ackaert, Leen and Dillen, Let and Pype, Peter and Van Den Noortgate, Nele and Meijboom, Berthold Rudy and Eeckloo, Kristof}},
  issn         = {{1472-684X}},
  journal      = {{BMC PALLIATIVE CARE}},
  keywords     = {{Palliative care,Ecosystem,Integrated care,Analytic hierarchy process,(AHP) method,COMPASSIONATE COMMUNITIES,PERFORMANCE,IMPLEMENTATION,NETWORKS,BARRIERS,MODEL,EoLC}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{17}},
  title        = {{Addressing integration in the organization of palliative care in Belgium : a multilevel ecosystems approach using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01585-2}},
  volume       = {{23}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

Altmetric

View in Altmetric

Web of Science

Times cited: