Evaluative conditioning of conflict aversiveness and its effects on adaptive control
- Author
- Ivan Ivanchei (UGent) , Senne Braem (UGent) , Luc Vermeylen and Wim Notebaert (UGent)
- Organization
- Project
-
- Thinking hurts - On the affective signatures of cognitive control
- Cognitive depletion or cognitive depression? On the role of affect in sustained cognitive control.
- The role of cognitive effort in motivated behaviour: a neurocognitive approach
- What makes us cognitively flexible? A new learning perspective
- Abstract
- Cognitive conflict is typically experienced as negative, which has been argued to drive adaptive behavior following a conflict. We tried to change the negative value of conflict using evaluative conditioning, and measured changes in conflict adaptation in a subsequent Stroop task (N = 416 Prolific participants, English native speakers from different countries). We did not find evidence for decreased conflict adaptation following positive evaluative conditioning of conflict. However, we also did not find evidence for the change of conflict evaluation measured with the affect misattribution procedure in the follow-up experiment (N = 70). Interestingly, the exploratory follow-up analysis showed that people with low goal motivation (as measured through BAS Drive) did show the expected effect. A memory test for the evaluative conditioning pairings and the follow-up experiment suggest that, although the affective value of conflict was difficult to change, people with low goal motivation experienced less difficulty remembering the association between conflict stimuli and positive pictures. Our findings show additional evidence that conflicts are inherently negative, however, there is no clear support for, or against, the affective signaling hypothesis, that is the idea that conflict negativity drives control adaptations.
- Keywords
- Conflict, Stroop task, Cognitive control, Affect, Conflict aversiveness, Evaluative conditioning, IMPLICIT, ADAPTATION, ACTIVATION, EXPLICIT, REWARD, INDIVIDUALS, ATTITUDES, RESPONSES, VALENCE, NEED
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 1.57 MB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-01JCTT5FJ4YSPWK2TE1K2SFQTF
- MLA
- Ivanchei, Ivan, et al. “Evaluative Conditioning of Conflict Aversiveness and Its Effects on Adaptive Control.” MOTIVATION AND EMOTION, vol. 48, no. 6, 2024, pp. 832–44, doi:10.1007/s11031-024-10091-0.
- APA
- Ivanchei, I., Braem, S., Vermeylen, L., & Notebaert, W. (2024). Evaluative conditioning of conflict aversiveness and its effects on adaptive control. MOTIVATION AND EMOTION, 48(6), 832–844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-024-10091-0
- Chicago author-date
- Ivanchei, Ivan, Senne Braem, Luc Vermeylen, and Wim Notebaert. 2024. “Evaluative Conditioning of Conflict Aversiveness and Its Effects on Adaptive Control.” MOTIVATION AND EMOTION 48 (6): 832–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-024-10091-0.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Ivanchei, Ivan, Senne Braem, Luc Vermeylen, and Wim Notebaert. 2024. “Evaluative Conditioning of Conflict Aversiveness and Its Effects on Adaptive Control.” MOTIVATION AND EMOTION 48 (6): 832–844. doi:10.1007/s11031-024-10091-0.
- Vancouver
- 1.Ivanchei I, Braem S, Vermeylen L, Notebaert W. Evaluative conditioning of conflict aversiveness and its effects on adaptive control. MOTIVATION AND EMOTION. 2024;48(6):832–44.
- IEEE
- [1]I. Ivanchei, S. Braem, L. Vermeylen, and W. Notebaert, “Evaluative conditioning of conflict aversiveness and its effects on adaptive control,” MOTIVATION AND EMOTION, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 832–844, 2024.
@article{01JCTT5FJ4YSPWK2TE1K2SFQTF,
abstract = {{Cognitive conflict is typically experienced as negative, which has been argued to drive adaptive behavior following a conflict. We tried to change the negative value of conflict using evaluative conditioning, and measured changes in conflict adaptation in a subsequent Stroop task (N = 416 Prolific participants, English native speakers from different countries). We did not find evidence for decreased conflict adaptation following positive evaluative conditioning of conflict. However, we also did not find evidence for the change of conflict evaluation measured with the affect misattribution procedure in the follow-up experiment (N = 70). Interestingly, the exploratory follow-up analysis showed that people with low goal motivation (as measured through BAS Drive) did show the expected effect. A memory test for the evaluative conditioning pairings and the follow-up experiment suggest that, although the affective value of conflict was difficult to change, people with low goal motivation experienced less difficulty remembering the association between conflict stimuli and positive pictures. Our findings show additional evidence that conflicts are inherently negative, however, there is no clear support for, or against, the affective signaling hypothesis, that is the idea that conflict negativity drives control adaptations.}},
author = {{Ivanchei, Ivan and Braem, Senne and Vermeylen, Luc and Notebaert, Wim}},
issn = {{0146-7239}},
journal = {{MOTIVATION AND EMOTION}},
keywords = {{Conflict,Stroop task,Cognitive control,Affect,Conflict aversiveness,Evaluative conditioning,IMPLICIT,ADAPTATION,ACTIVATION,EXPLICIT,REWARD,INDIVIDUALS,ATTITUDES,RESPONSES,VALENCE,NEED}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{6}},
pages = {{832--844}},
title = {{Evaluative conditioning of conflict aversiveness and its effects on adaptive control}},
url = {{http://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-024-10091-0}},
volume = {{48}},
year = {{2024}},
}
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: