Advanced search
1 file | 774.47 KB Add to list

The credibility cocktail on Instagram : assessing the impact of source, verification label and image manipulation on news message credibility

Stephanie D'haeseleer (UGent) , Kristin Van Damme (UGent) , Hayley Pearce (UGent) and Tom Evens (UGent)
Author
Organization
Abstract
In the current disinformation era, where both people and generative AI systems can easily create content, concerns about the credibility of online content have come to the fore in public and policy debates. Audiences are faced with the challenge of determining which news messages are credible and which are not. It remains however unclear how audiences evaluate the credibility of social media posts. This study evaluates three key ingredients of the credibility cocktail on Instagram: the source, the presence of a verification label and the use of images. Using two between-subject designs (N = 963), participants were exposed to an Instagram message regarding climate change. The findings demonstrate that audiences primarily assess the credibility of messages based on the source, i.e. the person or organization sharing the information. Messages sent by both a news outlet and non-governmental organization are considered to be more credible than messages shared by dubious sources. Remarkably, a verification label next to this source has no impact. Hence, audiences do not trust so-called ‘blue check accounts’ more than accounts without a verification label. Moreover, AI-generated images are perceived as more credible than photoshopped ones.
Keywords
AI-generated images, Audience engagement, Disinformation, Experiment, Fake news, Media literacy, News audiences, Social media

Downloads

  • Biblio D'haeseleer et al. (2024) The credibility cocktail on Instagram.pdf
    • full text (Accepted manuscript)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 774.47 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
D’haeseleer, Stephanie, et al. “The Credibility Cocktail on Instagram : Assessing the Impact of Source, Verification Label and Image Manipulation on News Message Credibility.” JOURNAL OF APPLIED JOURNALISM & MEDIA STUDIES, 2026, pp. 1–25, doi:10.1386/ajms_00158_1.
APA
D’haeseleer, S., Van Damme, K., Pearce, H., & Evens, T. (2026). The credibility cocktail on Instagram : assessing the impact of source, verification label and image manipulation on news message credibility. JOURNAL OF APPLIED JOURNALISM & MEDIA STUDIES, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms_00158_1
Chicago author-date
D’haeseleer, Stephanie, Kristin Van Damme, Hayley Pearce, and Tom Evens. 2026. “The Credibility Cocktail on Instagram : Assessing the Impact of Source, Verification Label and Image Manipulation on News Message Credibility.” JOURNAL OF APPLIED JOURNALISM & MEDIA STUDIES, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms_00158_1.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
D’haeseleer, Stephanie, Kristin Van Damme, Hayley Pearce, and Tom Evens. 2026. “The Credibility Cocktail on Instagram : Assessing the Impact of Source, Verification Label and Image Manipulation on News Message Credibility.” JOURNAL OF APPLIED JOURNALISM & MEDIA STUDIES: 1–25. doi:10.1386/ajms_00158_1.
Vancouver
1.
D’haeseleer S, Van Damme K, Pearce H, Evens T. The credibility cocktail on Instagram : assessing the impact of source, verification label and image manipulation on news message credibility. JOURNAL OF APPLIED JOURNALISM & MEDIA STUDIES. 2026;1–25.
IEEE
[1]
S. D’haeseleer, K. Van Damme, H. Pearce, and T. Evens, “The credibility cocktail on Instagram : assessing the impact of source, verification label and image manipulation on news message credibility,” JOURNAL OF APPLIED JOURNALISM & MEDIA STUDIES, pp. 1–25, 2026.
@article{01JBGV4PW9J3AQ80KDQQCDP1KV,
  abstract     = {{In the current disinformation era, where both people and generative AI systems can easily create content, concerns about the credibility of online content have come to the fore in public and policy debates. Audiences are faced with the challenge of determining which news messages are credible and which are not. It remains however unclear how audiences evaluate the credibility of social media posts. This study evaluates three key ingredients of the credibility cocktail on Instagram: the source, the presence of a verification label and the use of images. Using two between-subject designs (N = 963), participants were exposed to an Instagram message regarding climate change. The findings demonstrate that audiences primarily assess the credibility of messages based on the source, i.e. the person or organization sharing the information. Messages sent by both a news outlet and non-governmental organization are considered to be more credible than messages shared by dubious sources. Remarkably, a verification label next to this source has no impact. Hence, audiences do not trust so-called ‘blue check accounts’ more than accounts without a verification label. Moreover, AI-generated images are perceived as more credible than photoshopped ones.}},
  author       = {{D'haeseleer, Stephanie and Van Damme, Kristin and Pearce, Hayley and Evens, Tom}},
  issn         = {{2001-0818}},
  journal      = {{JOURNAL OF APPLIED JOURNALISM & MEDIA STUDIES}},
  keywords     = {{AI-generated images,Audience engagement,Disinformation,Experiment,Fake news,Media literacy,News audiences,Social media}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{1--25}},
  title        = {{The credibility cocktail on Instagram : assessing the impact of source, verification label and image manipulation on news message credibility}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1386/ajms_00158_1}},
  year         = {{2026}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric