Subjecthood and argument structure of synonymous Dat-Nom/Nom-Dat verbs across German and Icelandic
- Author
- Joren Somers (UGent) , Gard B. Jenset and Jóhanna Barðdal (UGent)
- Organization
- Project
- Abstract
- This paper investigates a set of 15 Icelandic verbs licensing both a nominative and a dative argument, recently analysed in the literature, comparing them with a corresponding set of 15 German verbs. The Icelandic dataset consists of verbs selecting for three different argument structures: a) ordinary Nom-Dat verbs, b) non-alternating Dat-Nom verbs and c) alternating Dat-Nom/Nom-Dat verbs. The German dataset contains either (near-)synonyms or cognates to the Icelandic verbs. One of our most important findings is that apparent Dat-Nom verbs in German, like gefallen ‘please, like’, are in fact alternating Dat-Nom/Nom-Dat verbs in that language. That is, these verbs can either instantiate the Dat-Nom or the Nom-Dat argument structure. This conclusion is supported by word order counts, which show a major difference between alternating Dat-Nom/Nom-Dat verbs and ordinary Nom-Dat verbs across both German and Icelandic. We also examine the set of alternating verbs across both languages statistically using a conditional inference tree. The differences between Icelandic and German especially play out in configurations involving pronouns, whereas, for double NPs, we identify the same additional factors as have already been identified for the monolingual (Icelandic) dataset, namely animacy, length and (in)definiteness.
- Keywords
- grammatical relations, dative subjects, neutral word order, pronouns vs. full NPs, conditional inference trees, argument structure, WORD-ORDER
Downloads
-
Prepubl.Subjecthood and argument structure of synonymous Dat-Nom-Nom-Dat verbs across German and Icelandic.pdf
- full text (Accepted manuscript)
- |
- open access
- |
- |
- 375.56 KB
-
(...).pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 758.65 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-01J96HWNJ856GF7QG8BT799BEV
- MLA
- Somers, Joren, et al. “Subjecthood and Argument Structure of Synonymous Dat-Nom/Nom-Dat Verbs across German and Icelandic.” LINGUA, vol. 312, 2024, doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2024.103833.
- APA
- Somers, J., Jenset, G. B., & Barðdal, J. (2024). Subjecthood and argument structure of synonymous Dat-Nom/Nom-Dat verbs across German and Icelandic. LINGUA, 312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2024.103833
- Chicago author-date
- Somers, Joren, Gard B. Jenset, and Jóhanna Barðdal. 2024. “Subjecthood and Argument Structure of Synonymous Dat-Nom/Nom-Dat Verbs across German and Icelandic.” LINGUA 312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2024.103833.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Somers, Joren, Gard B. Jenset, and Jóhanna Barðdal. 2024. “Subjecthood and Argument Structure of Synonymous Dat-Nom/Nom-Dat Verbs across German and Icelandic.” LINGUA 312. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2024.103833.
- Vancouver
- 1.Somers J, Jenset GB, Barðdal J. Subjecthood and argument structure of synonymous Dat-Nom/Nom-Dat verbs across German and Icelandic. LINGUA. 2024;312.
- IEEE
- [1]J. Somers, G. B. Jenset, and J. Barðdal, “Subjecthood and argument structure of synonymous Dat-Nom/Nom-Dat verbs across German and Icelandic,” LINGUA, vol. 312, 2024.
@article{01J96HWNJ856GF7QG8BT799BEV,
abstract = {{This paper investigates a set of 15 Icelandic verbs licensing both a nominative and a dative argument, recently analysed in the literature, comparing them with a corresponding set of 15 German verbs. The Icelandic dataset consists of verbs selecting for three different argument structures: a) ordinary Nom-Dat verbs, b) non-alternating Dat-Nom verbs and c) alternating Dat-Nom/Nom-Dat verbs. The German dataset contains either (near-)synonyms or cognates to the Icelandic verbs. One of our most important findings is that apparent Dat-Nom verbs in German, like gefallen ‘please, like’, are in fact alternating Dat-Nom/Nom-Dat verbs in that language. That is, these verbs can either instantiate the Dat-Nom or the Nom-Dat argument structure. This conclusion is supported by word order counts, which show a major difference between alternating Dat-Nom/Nom-Dat verbs and ordinary Nom-Dat verbs across both German and Icelandic. We also examine the set of alternating verbs across both languages statistically using a conditional inference tree. The differences between Icelandic and German especially play out in configurations involving pronouns, whereas, for double NPs, we identify the same additional factors as have already been identified for the monolingual (Icelandic) dataset, namely animacy, length and (in)definiteness.}},
articleno = {{103833}},
author = {{Somers, Joren and Jenset, Gard B. and Barðdal, Jóhanna}},
issn = {{0024-3841}},
journal = {{LINGUA}},
keywords = {{grammatical relations,dative subjects,neutral word order,pronouns vs. full NPs,conditional inference trees,argument structure,WORD-ORDER}},
language = {{eng}},
pages = {{27}},
title = {{Subjecthood and argument structure of synonymous Dat-Nom/Nom-Dat verbs across German and Icelandic}},
url = {{http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2024.103833}},
volume = {{312}},
year = {{2024}},
}
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: