@article{01J964KMQJTS70RM0Z2A65ZW6N,
  abstract     = {{Nitrogen (N) is an essential macronutrient for plant growth. As a widespread source of plant-available N, ammonia synthesis via the Haber-Bosch process has proven an extremely valuable commodity in farming systems since the middle of the twentieth century. However, its heavy reliance on ever-shrinking fossil fuel reserves and its sizeable carbon footprint have fostered the exploration of alternative, more sustainable, fertilising prospects. Through the recycling and reuse of nutrient byproducts, biobased fertilisers (BBF) can help reduce the European Union's dependency on imported synthetic fertilisers. In this study, we examined digestate, the liquid fraction of digestate, pig slurry and pig urine as potential substitutes for synthetic fertilisers. In a full-scale field approach using a different crop each year (maize, spinach, potatoes), the agronomic performance of the treatments (defined as the crop N uptake and the crop yield) and the environmental performance (taken as the residual soil nitrates after harvest) of the BBF treatments were compared with those of a synthetic fertiliser benchmark (calcium ammonium nitrate) at three N regimes. As regards short-term fertilising capability, results showed that yields obtained from BBFs were not statistically different (p > 0.05) than those obtained with synthetic fertilisers. Likewise, for soil residual nitrates (0-90 cm), measured in October-November of each year, no difference (p > 0.05) was detected between the BBFs and the synthetic fertiliser reference treatments. However, the nonsuperiority test showed that some BBFs tended to perform better in terms of residual nitrates than the synthetic regimes. Generally, results pointed to a fast N release ability of the BBFs, indicated by the presence of nitrates at different soil depths. Hence, as with the mineral fertiliser, BBFs were prone to leaching which calls for adequate N management strategies. The N content of some BBFs were shown to vary over time, hence adequate and timely nutrient characterisations must be carried out prior to field application to ensure a more accurate N accountancy and reduce risks of over-fertilisation (or under-fertilisation).}},
  articleno    = {{127380}},
  author       = {{Reuland, Gregory and Van de Sande, Tomas and Dekker, Harmen and Sigurnjak, Ivona and Meers, Erik}},
  issn         = {{1161-0301}},
  journal      = {{EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY}},
  keywords     = {{Biogas,Biobased fertilisers,Recycling derived fertilisers,Nitrogen uptake,Fertiliser replacement value,Agronomic performance,Nitrate leaching,Anaerobic digestion,Nutrient recovery,Nitrates directive,SUSTAINABLE INTENSIFICATION,SHORT-TERM,NITROGEN,EMISSIONS,AMMONIA,AVAILABILITY,PHOSPHORUS,MANAGEMENT,RISK}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{13}},
  title        = {{Digestate in replacement of synthetic fertilisers : a comparative 3-year field study of the crop performance and soil residual nitrates in West-Flanders}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2024.127380}},
  volume       = {{161}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

Altmetric

View in Altmetric

Web of Science

Times cited: